Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, Strathfield, New South Wales, Australia.
Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Am J Prev Med. 2017 May;52(5):653-666. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.12.008. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
The mental health benefits of physical activity are well established. However, less is known about whether the relationship between physical activity and mental health is consistent across different life domains. It is important to understand how context may influence the relationship between physical activity and mental health so that interventions and policy guidelines can be tailored to maximize positive effects.
In 2015, systematic searches of four databases identified 13,435 records, of which 98 studies met the inclusion criteria.
Included studies were published between 1988 and 2015 and had a combined sample size of 648,726. Of the 98 included studies, 93 examined leisure-time physical activity, 14 examined work-related physical activity, 15 examined transport physical activity, 16 examined household physical activity, three examined school sport, and three examined physical education. Multi-level meta-analyses showed that leisure-time physical activity (r =0.13) and transport physical activity (r =0.13) both had a positive association with mental health. Leisure-time physical activity (r = -0.11) and school sport (r = -0.09) both had an inverse association with mental ill-health. However, physical activity was not consistently associated with lower mental ill-health across domains, as work-related physical activity was positively associated with mental ill-health (r =0.09). Household physical activity and participation in physical education had no relationship with mental health or mental ill-health.
The domain in which physical activity occurs influences the relationship between physical activity and mental health and should, therefore, be considered when developing interventions, treatment programs, and policy guidelines.
身体活动对心理健康的益处已得到充分证实。然而,对于身体活动与心理健康之间的关系是否在不同的生活领域中保持一致,人们知之甚少。了解环境因素如何影响身体活动与心理健康之间的关系非常重要,这样才能有针对性地制定干预措施和政策指南,最大限度地发挥积极效果。
2015 年,通过对四个数据库的系统检索,共确定了 13435 条记录,其中 98 项研究符合纳入标准。
纳入的研究发表于 1988 年至 2015 年之间,综合样本量为 648726 人。在 98 项纳入的研究中,93 项研究了休闲时间的身体活动,14 项研究了与工作相关的身体活动,15 项研究了交通相关的身体活动,16 项研究了家务相关的身体活动,3 项研究了学校体育,3 项研究了体育教育。多层次荟萃分析显示,休闲时间的身体活动(r =0.13)和交通相关的身体活动(r =0.13)均与心理健康呈正相关。休闲时间的身体活动(r = -0.11)和学校体育(r = -0.09)均与心理健康不良呈负相关。然而,身体活动在不同领域与心理健康不良的相关性并不一致,因为与工作相关的身体活动与心理健康不良呈正相关(r =0.09)。家务身体活动和参加体育教育与心理健康或心理健康不良没有关系。
身体活动发生的领域会影响身体活动与心理健康之间的关系,因此在制定干预措施、治疗方案和政策指南时应予以考虑。