Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, 550 First Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Department of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, 227 East 30th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Jun;42(6):1650-1658. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-1039-6.
To compare the performance of non-contrast MRI with half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) vs. contrast-enhanced MRI/3D-MRCP for assessment of suspected choledocholithiasis in hospitalized patients.
123 contrast-enhanced abdominal MRI/MRCP scans in the hospital setting for possible choledocholithiasis were retrospectively evaluated. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraoperative cholangiogram or documented clinical resolution served as the reference standard. Readers first evaluated the biliary tree using coronal and axial HASTE and other non-contrast sequences, and later reviewed the entire exam with post-contrast sequences and 3D-MRCP. Test performance for the image sets was compared for choledocholithiasis, acute hepatitis, cholangitis, and acute cholecystitis. Reader agreement, MRCP image quality, and confidence levels were also assessed. Clinical predictors of age and fever were tested for association with perceived need for contrast in biliary assessment.
There were 27 cases of choledocholithiasis, 31 cases of acute hepatitis, 37 cases of acute cholecystitis, and 3 clinically diagnosed cases of acute cholangitis. Both the abbreviated and full contrast-enhanced/MRCP image sets resulted in high accuracy for choledocholithiasis (91.1-94.3% vs. 91.9-92.7%). There was no difference in sensitivity or specificity for either reader for any diagnosis between image sets (p > 0.40). 1 reader showed improved confidence (p < 0.001) with inclusion of MRCP and contrast-enhanced images, but neither confidence nor MRCP quality scores were associated with diagnostic accuracy. Patient age and fever did not predict the need for contrast-enhanced images.
In hospitalized patients with suspected choledocholithiasis, performance of non-contrast abdominal MRI with HASTE is similar to contrast-enhanced MRI with 3D-MRCP, offering potential for decreased scanning time and improved patient tolerability.
比较非增强 MRI 与半傅里叶采集单次激发快速自旋回波(HASTE)与对比增强 MRI/3D-MRCP 对疑似胆总管结石患者的诊断效能。
回顾性分析了 123 例在我院行腹部 MRI/MRCP 检查以明确是否存在胆总管结石的患者。以经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术、术中胆管造影或临床确诊为参考标准。首先,读者使用冠状位和轴位 HASTE 及其他非增强序列评估胆道,然后使用增强后序列和 3D-MRCP 评估整个检查。比较了这些图像对胆总管结石、急性肝炎、胆管炎和急性胆囊炎的诊断效能。还评估了读者间的一致性、MRCP 图像质量和信心水平。对年龄和发热等临床预测因素进行了测试,以评估其与胆道增强评估的相关性。
共发现 27 例胆总管结石、31 例急性肝炎、37 例急性胆囊炎和 3 例临床诊断的急性胆管炎。无论是缩短版还是完整的增强/MRCP 图像都能得到很高的胆总管结石诊断准确率(91.1-94.3% 与 91.9-92.7%)。两位读者在图像之间对任何诊断的敏感性或特异性都没有差异(p>0.40)。1 位读者在加入 MRCP 和增强图像后信心明显提高(p<0.001),但信心和 MRCP 质量评分与诊断准确性无关。患者年龄和发热并不能预测是否需要增强图像。
在疑似胆总管结石的住院患者中,HASTE 非增强腹部 MRI 的表现与增强 MRI 联合 3D-MRCP 相似,可能具有缩短扫描时间和提高患者耐受性的优势。