Suppr超能文献

住院患者可疑胆总管结石的非对比 MRI 与 HASTE 对比增强 MRI/3D-MRCP 的性能比较。

Comparative performance of non-contrast MRI with HASTE vs. contrast-enhanced MRI/3D-MRCP for possible choledocholithiasis in hospitalized patients.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, 550 First Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA.

Department of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, 227 East 30th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Jun;42(6):1650-1658. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-1039-6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the performance of non-contrast MRI with half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) vs. contrast-enhanced MRI/3D-MRCP for assessment of suspected choledocholithiasis in hospitalized patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

123 contrast-enhanced abdominal MRI/MRCP scans in the hospital setting for possible choledocholithiasis were retrospectively evaluated. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraoperative cholangiogram or documented clinical resolution served as the reference standard. Readers first evaluated the biliary tree using coronal and axial HASTE and other non-contrast sequences, and later reviewed the entire exam with post-contrast sequences and 3D-MRCP. Test performance for the image sets was compared for choledocholithiasis, acute hepatitis, cholangitis, and acute cholecystitis. Reader agreement, MRCP image quality, and confidence levels were also assessed. Clinical predictors of age and fever were tested for association with perceived need for contrast in biliary assessment.

RESULTS

There were 27 cases of choledocholithiasis, 31 cases of acute hepatitis, 37 cases of acute cholecystitis, and 3 clinically diagnosed cases of acute cholangitis. Both the abbreviated and full contrast-enhanced/MRCP image sets resulted in high accuracy for choledocholithiasis (91.1-94.3% vs. 91.9-92.7%). There was no difference in sensitivity or specificity for either reader for any diagnosis between image sets (p > 0.40). 1 reader showed improved confidence (p < 0.001) with inclusion of MRCP and contrast-enhanced images, but neither confidence nor MRCP quality scores were associated with diagnostic accuracy. Patient age and fever did not predict the need for contrast-enhanced images.

CONCLUSION

In hospitalized patients with suspected choledocholithiasis, performance of non-contrast abdominal MRI with HASTE is similar to contrast-enhanced MRI with 3D-MRCP, offering potential for decreased scanning time and improved patient tolerability.

摘要

目的

比较非增强 MRI 与半傅里叶采集单次激发快速自旋回波(HASTE)与对比增强 MRI/3D-MRCP 对疑似胆总管结石患者的诊断效能。

方法和材料

回顾性分析了 123 例在我院行腹部 MRI/MRCP 检查以明确是否存在胆总管结石的患者。以经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术、术中胆管造影或临床确诊为参考标准。首先,读者使用冠状位和轴位 HASTE 及其他非增强序列评估胆道,然后使用增强后序列和 3D-MRCP 评估整个检查。比较了这些图像对胆总管结石、急性肝炎、胆管炎和急性胆囊炎的诊断效能。还评估了读者间的一致性、MRCP 图像质量和信心水平。对年龄和发热等临床预测因素进行了测试,以评估其与胆道增强评估的相关性。

结果

共发现 27 例胆总管结石、31 例急性肝炎、37 例急性胆囊炎和 3 例临床诊断的急性胆管炎。无论是缩短版还是完整的增强/MRCP 图像都能得到很高的胆总管结石诊断准确率(91.1-94.3% 与 91.9-92.7%)。两位读者在图像之间对任何诊断的敏感性或特异性都没有差异(p>0.40)。1 位读者在加入 MRCP 和增强图像后信心明显提高(p<0.001),但信心和 MRCP 质量评分与诊断准确性无关。患者年龄和发热并不能预测是否需要增强图像。

结论

在疑似胆总管结石的住院患者中,HASTE 非增强腹部 MRI 的表现与增强 MRI 联合 3D-MRCP 相似,可能具有缩短扫描时间和提高患者耐受性的优势。

相似文献

2
ACCURACY OF ABBREVIATED PROTOCOL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIO-PANCREATOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS.
Arq Gastroenterol. 2022 Apr-Jun;59(2):188-192. doi: 10.1590/S0004-2803.202202000-35.
3
Is MRCP necessary to diagnose pancreas divisum?
BMC Med Imaging. 2019 Apr 29;19(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12880-019-0329-1.
4
Accuracy and timeliness of an abbreviated emergency department MRCP protocol for choledocholithiasis.
Emerg Radiol. 2019 Aug;26(4):427-432. doi: 10.1007/s10140-019-01689-w. Epub 2019 Apr 27.
5
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Endoscopy. 2008 Sep;40(9):739-45. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1077509. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
6
Utility of MRCP in clinical decision making of suspected choledocholithiasis: An institutional analysis and literature review.
Am J Surg. 2017 Aug;214(2):251-255. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.10.025. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
8
The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the exclusion of choledocholithiasis.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct;51(10):1249-56. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1182584. Epub 2016 May 16.
10
Clinical evaluation of further-developed MRCP sequences in comparison with standard MRCP sequences.
Eur Radiol. 2002 Jul;12(7):1768-77. doi: 10.1007/s00330-001-1245-6. Epub 2002 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

5
A Case of Hemorrhagic Cholecystitis in a Patient on Apixaban After COVID-19 Infection.
Am J Case Rep. 2023 Jul 21;24:e939677. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.939677.
8
Is MRCP necessary to diagnose pancreas divisum?
BMC Med Imaging. 2019 Apr 29;19(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12880-019-0329-1.
9
Accuracy and timeliness of an abbreviated emergency department MRCP protocol for choledocholithiasis.
Emerg Radiol. 2019 Aug;26(4):427-432. doi: 10.1007/s10140-019-01689-w. Epub 2019 Apr 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid acquisition axial and coronal T2 HASTE MR in the evaluation of acute abdominal pain.
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Jan;85(1):286-290. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
2
MR Evaluation of the Nontraumatic Acute Abdomen with CT Correlation.
Radiol Clin North Am. 2015 Nov;53(6):1327-39. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2015.06.014. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
3
Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 26;2015(2):CD011549. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011549.
4
The Value of Magnetic Resonance Cholangio-Pancreatography (MRCP) in the Detection of Choledocholithiasis.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Sep;7(9):1941-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6158.3365. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
5
ACR appropriateness criteria jaundice.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2013 Jun;10(6):402-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.02.020. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
6
Epidemiology of gallbladder disease: cholelithiasis and cancer.
Gut Liver. 2012 Apr;6(2):172-87. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2012.6.2.172. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
7
The economic burden of incidentally detected findings.
Radiol Clin North Am. 2011 Mar;49(2):257-65. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2010.11.004.
8
The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jan;71(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.041.
10
EUS: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected choledocholithiasis.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Feb;67(2):235-44. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.09.047.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验