Morrin M M, Farrell R J, McEntee G, MacMathuna P, Stack J P, Murray J G
Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Dublin,
Clin Radiol. 2000 Nov;55(11):866-73. doi: 10.1053/crad.2000.0552.
We prospectively compared two breath-hold magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) sequences: single-shot rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) and multislice half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) in imaging the pancreaticobiliary system.
The diagnostic accuracy of single-shot RARE and multislice HASTE was studied in 34 subjects who had undergone conventional cholangiopancreatography. Overall image quality, duct conspicuity, image artifact, signal intensity and contrast-to-noise ratios were assessed independently by two radiologists who were unaware of the underlying diagnosis.
Both sequences had comparable diagnostic accuracy regarding a normal biliary system, choledocholithiasis, extra-hepatic and intra-hepatic strictures. Single-shot RARE was superior to multislice HASTE in diagnosing a normal pancreatic system, pancreatic and intrahepatic duct strictures, while providing significantly better image quality (mean +/- SE 3.7 +/- 0.07 vs 3.3 +/- 0.08: P = 0.02) and significantly less image artifact (mean +/- SE 3.6 +/- 0.07 vs 3.2 +/- 0.08: P = 0.01). Single-shot RARE provided significantly better duct conspicuity regarding the pancreatic duct within the body (2.7 +/- 0.2 vs 2.1 +/- 0.2: P = 0.003) and tail (2.4 +/- 0.2 vs 1.6 +/- 0.2;P = 0.0001), as well as the intrahepatic ducts (3.0 +/- 0.1 vs 2.6 +/- 0.1: P = 0.004) but there was no significant difference regarding the remainder of the biliary tree.
Single-shot RARE provides superior image quality, duct conspicuity with the added advantage of less image artifact and shorter acquisition time. However, volume averaging can cause common bile duct stones to be missed. Therefore, multislice HASTE sequences should still be acquired if choledocholithiasis is suspected. Larger studies are required to assess the diagnostic efficacy of single-shot RARE sequences in pancreatic duct and intra-hepatic duct disease.Morrin, M. M. (2000). Clinical Radiology55, 866-873.
我们前瞻性地比较了两种屏气磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)序列:单次激发快速采集弛豫增强序列(RARE)和多层半傅里叶采集单次激发快速自旋回波序列(HASTE)在胰胆管系统成像中的表现。
对34例接受过传统胰胆管造影的患者研究了单次激发RARE序列和多层HASTE序列的诊断准确性。由两名不知潜在诊断结果的放射科医生独立评估整体图像质量、胆管显影、图像伪影、信号强度和对比噪声比。
在正常胆管系统、胆总管结石、肝外和肝内狭窄方面,两种序列的诊断准确性相当。在诊断正常胰腺系统、胰腺和肝内胆管狭窄方面,单次激发RARE序列优于多层HASTE序列,同时图像质量明显更好(均值±标准误3.7±0.07对3.3±0.08:P = 0.02),图像伪影明显更少(均值±标准误3.6±0.07对3.2±0.08:P = 0.01)。单次激发RARE序列在显示胰体部(2.7±0.2对2.1±0.2:P = 0.003)、胰尾部(2.4±0.2对1.6±0.2;P = 0.0001)以及肝内胆管(3.0±0.1对2.6±0.1:P = 0.004)的胆管显影方面明显更好,但在胆管树其余部分的显影上无显著差异。
单次激发RARE序列提供了更高的图像质量、胆管显影,且具有图像伪影更少和采集时间更短的额外优势。然而,容积平均效应可能导致胆总管结石漏诊。因此,如果怀疑有胆总管结石,仍应采集多层HASTE序列。需要更大规模的研究来评估单次激发RARE序列在胰腺导管和肝内胆管疾病中的诊断效能。莫林,M.M.(2000年)。《临床放射学》55卷,866 - 873页。