Wasserman Richard L, Ito Diane, Xiong Yan, Ye Xiaolan, Bonnet Patrick, Li-McLeod Josephine
Allergy Partners of North Texas, 7777 Forest Lane, Suite B-332, Dallas, TX, 75230, USA.
Health Economics, Outcomes Research & Epidemiology, Shire, 650 Kendall St, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.
J Clin Immunol. 2017 Feb;37(2):180-186. doi: 10.1007/s10875-017-0371-0. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
Patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDD) are at increased risk of infection and may require lifelong immunoglobulin G (IgG) replacement. Infection incidence rates were determined for patients with PIDD receiving intravenously administered IgG (IGIV) in a home or hospital outpatient infusion center (HOIC).
Data were extracted from a large, US-based, employer-sponsored administrative database. Patients were eligible for analysis if they had ≥1 inpatient or emergency room claim or ≥2 outpatient claims with a PIDD diagnosis between January 2002 and March 2013, 12 months of continuous health plan enrollment prior to index date (i.e., first IGIV infusion date), and 6 months of continuous IGIV at the same site of care after the index date. Incidences of pneumonia (bacterial or viral) and bronchitis (all types) within 7 days of IGIV infusion were retrospectively determined and compared between sites of care.
A total of 1076 patients were included in the analysis; 51 and 49% received IGIV at home and at an HOIC, respectively. The event/patient-year of pneumonia was significantly lower in patients receiving IGIV at home compared to an outpatient hospital (0.102 vs. 0.216, p = 0.0071). Similarly, the event/patient-year of bronchitis was significantly lower among patients infusing at home compared to an HOIC (0.150 vs. 0.288, p < 0.0001).
PIDD patients experienced incidence rates for pneumonia and bronchitis that were lower for patients receiving home-based IGIV treatment versus HOIC-based IGIV treatment. The lower infection rates in the home setting suggest that infection risk may be an important factor in site of care selection.
原发性免疫缺陷病(PIDD)患者感染风险增加,可能需要终身补充免疫球蛋白G(IgG)。本研究确定了在家庭或医院门诊输液中心(HOIC)接受静脉注射IgG(IGIV)的PIDD患者的感染发病率。
数据取自一个美国大型的、由雇主赞助的行政数据库。2002年1月至2013年3月期间,若患者有≥1次住院或急诊室就诊记录,或≥2次门诊就诊记录且诊断为PIDD,在索引日期(即首次IGIV输注日期)前连续参加健康计划12个月,且在索引日期后在同一护理地点连续接受IGIV治疗6个月,则符合分析条件。回顾性确定IGIV输注后7天内肺炎(细菌性或病毒性)和支气管炎(所有类型)的发病率,并比较不同护理地点之间的发病率。
共有1076例患者纳入分析;分别有51%和49%的患者在家中和HOIC接受IGIV治疗。与门诊医院相比,在家中接受IGIV治疗的患者肺炎的事件/患者年显著更低(0.102对0.216,p = 0.0071)。同样,与HOIC相比,在家中输液的患者支气管炎的事件/患者年显著更低(0.150对0.288,p < 0.0001)。
与基于HOIC进行IGIV治疗的患者相比,接受家庭IGIV治疗的PIDD患者肺炎和支气管炎的发病率更低。家庭环境中较低的感染率表明,感染风险可能是护理地点选择的一个重要因素。