• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于耐旱生理特征预测草本双子叶植物对土壤湿度的栖息地亲和力。

Predicting habitat affinities of herbaceous dicots to soil wetness based on physiological traits of drought tolerance.

作者信息

Belluau Michaël, Shipley Bill

出版信息

Ann Bot. 2017 Apr 1;119(6):1073-1084. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcw267.

DOI:10.1093/aob/mcw267
PMID:28160464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5604612/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Soil water availability is an important mechanism filtering plant species but the functional basis of this filtering in herbaceous dicots is poorly studied. The authors address three questions: Which physiological traits best predict different levels of drought tolerance or avoidance in herbaceous dicots? To what degree can species' habitat preferences along the gradient of soil moisture availability be predicted by their physiological responses to drought? What are the direct and indirect relationships between the physiological traits and how do they interact to determine the species' habitat preferences?

METHODS

Twenty-five species of herbaceous dicots whose field distributions span a gradient of soil moisture from continually moist to dry were chosen. Under controlled conditions, watering was stopped in a treatment group, the plants were monitored until death of the above-ground tissues and compared with a control group watered at field capacity. Fourteen traits related to plant water economy were measured, including stomatal conductance, net photosynthesis and the visual wilting of leaves. Traits were then analysed using a cumulative link model and path analysis.

KEY RESULTS

Five physiological traits (stomatal conductance and net photosynthesis measured at soil field capacity, water use efficiency, stomatal conductance and soil water potential measured when leaves begin to wilt) related to the ability to acquire resources (when water is not limiting) or conserve water (when it is limiting) best predicted different levels of drought tolerance or avoidance in herbaceous dicots.

CONCLUSIONS

Species' habitat preferences can be fairly predicted by their physiological responses to drought ( R 2  = 0·48). Strong direct and indirect relationships between the five identified traits (plus net photosynthesis at wilting and the time until death) led to synergistic and antagonistic relationship in a path analysis model. To allow better prediction of species distributions along a wetness gradient, the next step would be to link these physiological traits to more accessible functional traits.

摘要

背景与目的

土壤水分有效性是筛选植物物种的重要机制,但草本双子叶植物中这种筛选的功能基础研究较少。作者提出了三个问题:哪些生理特征能最好地预测草本双子叶植物不同程度的耐旱性或避旱性?根据物种对干旱的生理反应,能在多大程度上预测其在土壤水分有效性梯度上的栖息地偏好?生理特征之间的直接和间接关系是什么,它们如何相互作用以决定物种的栖息地偏好?

方法

选择了25种草本双子叶植物,其野外分布跨越从持续湿润到干燥的土壤湿度梯度。在受控条件下,对一个处理组停止浇水,监测植物直至地上组织死亡,并与以田间持水量浇水的对照组进行比较。测量了与植物水分经济相关的14个特征,包括气孔导度、净光合作用和叶片的可视萎蔫。然后使用累积链接模型和路径分析对特征进行分析。

关键结果

与获取资源(水分不限制时)或保持水分(水分限制时)能力相关的五个生理特征(在土壤田间持水量时测量的气孔导度和净光合作用、水分利用效率、叶片开始萎蔫时测量的气孔导度和土壤水势)能最好地预测草本双子叶植物不同程度的耐旱性或避旱性。

结论

根据物种对干旱的生理反应,可以较好地预测其栖息地偏好(R² = 0·48)。在路径分析模型中,五个已确定特征(加上萎蔫时的净光合作用和死亡时间)之间强烈的直接和间接关系导致了协同和拮抗关系。为了更好地预测物种沿湿度梯度的分布,下一步是将这些生理特征与更易获取的功能特征联系起来。

相似文献

1
Predicting habitat affinities of herbaceous dicots to soil wetness based on physiological traits of drought tolerance.基于耐旱生理特征预测草本双子叶植物对土壤湿度的栖息地亲和力。
Ann Bot. 2017 Apr 1;119(6):1073-1084. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcw267.
2
Linking hard and soft traits: Physiology, morphology and anatomy interact to determine habitat affinities to soil water availability in herbaceous dicots.将硬特质和软特质联系起来:草本双子叶植物的生理学、形态和解剖结构相互作用,决定了对土壤水分供应的生境亲和力。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 28;13(3):e0193130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193130. eCollection 2018.
3
Long-term water stress leads to acclimation of drought sensitivity of photosynthetic capacity in xeric but not riparian Eucalyptus species.长期水分胁迫会导致旱生桉树种而非河岸桉树种的光合能力干旱敏感性发生适应性变化。
Ann Bot. 2016 Jan;117(1):133-44. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcv161. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
4
The correlations and sequence of plant stomatal, hydraulic, and wilting responses to drought.植物气孔、水力和萎蔫对干旱响应的相关性及顺序
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 15;113(46):13098-13103. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604088113. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
5
Population differentiation in a Mediterranean relict shrub: the potential role of local adaptation for coping with climate change.一种地中海残遗灌木的种群分化:局部适应在应对气候变化中的潜在作用。
Oecologia. 2016 Apr;180(4):1075-90. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3514-0. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
6
Functional and Structural Leaf Plasticity Determine Photosynthetic Performances during Drought Stress and Recovery in Two Platanus orientalis Populations from Contrasting Habitats.功能和结构叶片可塑性决定了来自不同生境的两个悬铃木种群在干旱胁迫和恢复过程中的光合性能。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 May 30;21(11):3912. doi: 10.3390/ijms21113912.
7
Relationships between plant drought response, traits, and climate of origin for green roof plant selection.绿色屋顶植物选择中植物抗旱性、特性与起源地气候的关系。
Ecol Appl. 2018 Oct;28(7):1752-1761. doi: 10.1002/eap.1782. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
8
Above- and below-ground plant traits are not consistent in response to drought and competition treatments.地上和地下植物特性对干旱和竞争处理的响应不一致。
Ann Bot. 2022 Dec 31;130(7):939-950. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac108.
9
Different combinations of morpho-physiological traits are responsible for tolerance to drought in wild tomatoes Solanum chilense and Solanum peruvianum.形态生理特征的不同组合决定了野生番茄智利茄和秘鲁茄对干旱的耐受性。
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2016 May;18(3):406-16. doi: 10.1111/plb.12409. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
10
Drought response strategies and hydraulic traits contribute to mechanistic understanding of plant dry-down to hydraulic failure.干旱响应策略和水力特性有助于对植物因水力衰竭而枯萎这一现象的机理的理解。
Tree Physiol. 2019 Jun 1;39(6):910-924. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpz016.

引用本文的文献

1
Distinguishing drought resistance strategies and identifying indicator traits of and .区分抗旱策略并识别[具体植物或作物名称]的指示性状
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Aug 20;16:1644756. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1644756. eCollection 2025.
2
Effects of sex and soil water chemistry on leaf morphology and physiology of Myrica gale var. tomentosa.性别和土壤水分化学对华西灯台树叶片形态和生理的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 22;17(9):e0275024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275024. eCollection 2022.
3
Consistent trait-environment relationships within and across tundra plant communities.在苔原植物群落内部和跨群落中,一致的性状-环境关系。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2021 Apr;5(4):458-467. doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01396-1. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
4
Comparative drought resistance of temperate grassland species: testing performance trade-offs and the relation to distribution.温带草原物种的比较耐旱性:检验性能权衡与分布的关系。
Oecologia. 2020 Apr;192(4):1023-1036. doi: 10.1007/s00442-020-04625-9. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
5
Linking hard and soft traits: Physiology, morphology and anatomy interact to determine habitat affinities to soil water availability in herbaceous dicots.将硬特质和软特质联系起来:草本双子叶植物的生理学、形态和解剖结构相互作用,决定了对土壤水分供应的生境亲和力。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 28;13(3):e0193130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193130. eCollection 2018.
6
Challenges in Complementing Data from Ground-Based Sensors with Satellite-Derived Products to Measure Ecological Changes in Relation to Climate-Lessons from Temperate Wetland-Upland Landscapes.利用卫星衍生产品补充地面传感器数据以测量与气候相关的生态变化面临的挑战——温带湿地-高地景观的经验教训。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Mar 16;18(3):880. doi: 10.3390/s18030880.

本文引用的文献

1
Reinforcing loose foundation stones in trait-based plant ecology.强化基于性状的植物生态学中的松散基石。
Oecologia. 2016 Apr;180(4):923-31. doi: 10.1007/s00442-016-3549-x. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
2
Risk-taking plants: anisohydric behavior as a stress-resistance trait.冒险植物:非等水行为作为一种抗逆特征。
Plant Signal Behav. 2012 Jul;7(7):767-70. doi: 10.4161/psb.20505. Epub 2012 Jul 1.
3
Arabidopsis growth under prolonged high temperature and water deficit: independent or interactive effects?拟南芥在长时间高温和水分亏缺下的生长:是独立的还是相互作用的影响?
Plant Cell Environ. 2012 Apr;35(4):702-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02445.x. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
4
A strong test of a maximum entropy model of trait-based community assembly.基于特征的群落组装最大熵模型的有力检验。
Ecology. 2011 Feb;92(2):507-17. doi: 10.1890/10-0394.1.
5
A fundamental, eco-hydrological basis for niche segregation in plant communities.植物群落生态位分异的基本生态水文学基础。
New Phytol. 2011 Jan;189(1):253-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03475.x. Epub 2010 Sep 24.
6
Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic.确保尺度差异卡方检验统计量的正值性。
Psychometrika. 2010 Jun;75(2):243-248. doi: 10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y.
7
Contrasting drought tolerance strategies in two desert annuals of hybrid origin.两种源于杂交的荒漠一年生植物耐旱策略的对比。
J Exp Bot. 2010 Jun;61(10):2769-78. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq109. Epub 2010 Apr 30.
8
Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought?干旱期间植物存活与死亡的机制:为何有些植物能存活而其他植物却死于干旱?
New Phytol. 2008;178(4):719-739. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02436.x. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
9
From plant traits to plant communities: a statistical mechanistic approach to biodiversity.从植物性状到植物群落:生物多样性的统计力学方法
Science. 2006 Nov 3;314(5800):812-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1131344. Epub 2006 Oct 5.
10
The effects of stress on plant cuticular waxes.压力对植物表皮蜡质的影响。
New Phytol. 2006;171(3):469-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01826.x.