Farabi Sarah S, Quinn Lauretta, Carley David W
Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado.
Department of Biobehavioral Health Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2017 May 15;13(5):669-674. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6580.
Accurate objective measurement of sleep, an important health behavior, is needed. Individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) have altered sleep architecture and reduced sleep quality in comparison with healthy controls. The aim of this investigation was to compare a commonly used actigraphy device, Actiwatch2, with polysomnography (PSG)-based measures of sleep in young adults with T1DM, and to determine which Actiwatch2 threshold setting provides the best correspondence.
Subjects age 18-30 years with T1DM wore the Actiwatch2 while simultaneously undergoing in-laboratory PSG. Sleep parameters were derived from the Actiwatch2 using the three different sensitivity thresholds (low, medium, and high) provided by the manufacturer and compared with sleep parameters from PSG. Statistical analysis included intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots for comparison of sleep parameters. Cohen kappa and the prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) were calculated to determine agreement between epoch-by-epoch sleep and wake data measured by the PSG versus Actiwatch2.
Twenty-seven subjects were included in the analysis. The low threshold setting provided the greatest agreement and least bias in comparison with PSG for sleep parameters (intraclass correlation coefficient range 0.38 to 0.77). Mean differences between the low setting and PSG were nonsignificant ( > .65) for all sleep parameters except sleep onset latency ( = .04). All three settings provided approximately equivalent and moderate epoch-by-epoch agreement with the PSG (PABAK coefficients ranging from 0.56 to 0.63).
When measuring sleep with the Actiwatch2 in young adults with T1DM, the low threshold setting provides the most accurate estimates of sleep parameters in comparison with PSG.
睡眠作为一项重要的健康行为,需要进行准确的客观测量。与健康对照组相比,1型糖尿病(T1DM)患者的睡眠结构发生改变,睡眠质量下降。本研究旨在比较一种常用的活动记录仪Actiwatch2与基于多导睡眠图(PSG)的测量方法在T1DM青年患者中的睡眠情况,并确定Actiwatch2的哪种阈值设置能提供最佳的对应关系。
18至30岁的T1DM患者佩戴Actiwatch2,同时在实验室进行PSG检查。使用制造商提供的三种不同灵敏度阈值(低、中、高)从Actiwatch2获取睡眠参数,并与PSG的睡眠参数进行比较。统计分析包括组内相关系数和Bland-Altman图,用于比较睡眠参数。计算Cohen kappa以及经患病率调整和偏差调整的kappa(PABAK),以确定PSG与Actiwatch2测量的逐段睡眠和清醒数据之间的一致性。
27名受试者纳入分析。与PSG相比,低阈值设置在睡眠参数方面提供了最大的一致性和最小的偏差(组内相关系数范围为0.38至0.77)。除入睡潜伏期(P = 0.04)外,低设置与PSG之间所有睡眠参数的平均差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.65)。所有三种设置与PSG的逐段一致性大致相当且中等(PABAK系数范围为0.56至0.63)。
在T1DM青年患者中使用Actiwatch2测量睡眠时,与PSG相比,低阈值设置能提供最准确的睡眠参数估计。