Department of Rehabilitation, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Rehabilitation, Epworth Monash Rehabilitation Medicine (EMReM) Unit, Melbourne, Australia.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2022 Nov 1;18(11):2605-2616. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10174.
Sleep disturbance often emerges in the early recovery phase following a moderate to severe traumatic brain injury, known as posttraumatic amnesia. Actigraphy is commonly employed to assess sleep, as it is assumed that patients in posttraumatic amnesia (who display confusion, restlessness, and agitation) would better tolerate this measure over gold-standard polysomnography (PSG). This study evaluated the agreement between PSG and actigraphy for determining (sleep/wake time, sleep efficiency, sleep latency, and awakenings) in patients experiencing posttraumatic amnesia. It also compared the epoch-by-epoch sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy between the Actigraph device's 4 wake threshold settings (low, medium, high, and automatic) to PSG.
The sample consisted of 24 inpatients recruited from a traumatic brain injury inpatient rehabilitation unit. Ambulatory PSG was recorded overnight at bedside and a Philips Actiwatch was secured to each patient's wrist for the same period.
There were poor correlations between PSG and actigraphy for all parameters (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient = < 0.80). The low threshold displayed the highest correlation with PSG for wake and sleep time, albeit still low. Actigraphy displayed low specificity (ranging from 17.1% to 36.6%). There appears to be a greater disparity between actigraphy and PSG for patients with increased wake time.
Actigraphy, while convenient, demonstrated poorer performance in determining sleep-wake parameters in patients with significantly disturbed sleep. Ambulatory PSG can provide a clearer understanding of the extent of sleep disturbances in these patients with reduced mobility during early rehabilitation. Study findings can help design future protocols of sleep assessment during posttraumatic amnesia and optimize treatment.
Fedele B, McKenzie D, Williams G, Giles R, Olver J. A comparison of agreement between actigraphy and polysomnography for assessing sleep during posttraumatic amnesia. . 2022;18(11):2605-2616.
中重度创伤性脑损伤(即创伤后遗忘)后早期康复阶段常出现睡眠障碍。通常使用活动记录仪评估睡眠,因为假设创伤后遗忘(表现为混乱、不安和躁动)的患者会更好地耐受这种测量方法,而不是金标准多导睡眠图(PSG)。本研究评估了 PSG 和活动记录仪在确定创伤后遗忘患者(睡眠/觉醒时间、睡眠效率、睡眠潜伏期和觉醒)方面的一致性。它还比较了 Actigraph 设备的 4 种唤醒阈值设置(低、中、高和自动)与 PSG 的逐时敏感性、特异性和准确性。
该样本由 24 名从创伤性脑损伤住院康复病房招募的住院患者组成。在床边整夜记录动态 PSG,并在同一时期将飞利浦 Actiwatch 固定在每个患者的手腕上。
所有参数的 PSG 和活动记录仪之间相关性均较差(Lin 的一致性相关系数<0.80)。低阈值与 PSG 的唤醒时间和睡眠时间相关性最高,但仍较低。活动记录仪的特异性较低(范围为 17.1%至 36.6%)。对于唤醒时间增加的患者,活动记录仪与 PSG 之间似乎存在更大的差异。
活动记录仪虽然方便,但在确定睡眠障碍患者的睡眠-觉醒参数方面表现较差。在早期康复期间活动能力降低的这些患者中,动态 PSG 可以更清楚地了解睡眠障碍的程度。研究结果有助于设计创伤后遗忘期间的睡眠评估未来方案,并优化治疗。
Fedele B、McKenzie D、Williams G、Giles R、Olver J. 活动记录仪与多导睡眠图评估创伤后遗忘期间睡眠的比较。 2022;18(11):2605-2616.