• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心评估加拿大高致敏患者心脏移植名单上的国家器官共享政策。

Multicenter evaluation of a national organ sharing policy for highly sensitized patients listed for heart transplantation in Canada.

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Foothills Medical Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta; Canada.

Division of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 May;36(5):491-498. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2017.01.003
PMID:28162932
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transplantation of sensitized recipients has been associated with increased risk of post-transplant complications. In 2010, the Canadian Cardiac Transplant Network (CCTN) created a unique status listing for highly sensitized heart transplant candidates. Status 4S listing requires calculated panel-reactive antibody (cPRA) level >80% as the sole listing criteria and enables geographic expansion of the donor pool by providing national access. In this study, we describe patient characteristics and outcomes of those transplanted as Status 4S in Canada.

METHODS

Patients' characteristics and clinical outcomes were retrospectively collected from all 11 adult heart transplant centers in Canada.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients were listed Status 4S from January 2010 to September 2015. Fifty-two were transplanted as Status 4S. Of these 52 transplants, mean cPRA level was 93.4%, mean age was 47 years, 46% were male, 44% had dilated cardiomyopathy and 17% were re-transplanted for cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Blood group O comprised 42% and 53% had a left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant. Desensitization therapy occurred in 9 patients (17%). Over a mean follow-up period of 28 months (1 week to 5.3 years), 9 patients died (17%). Kaplan-Meier 1-year year survival is 86%. Two patients were treated for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in the first year post-transplant and 33% of patients had at least 1 ISHLT Grade ≥2R cellular rejection in the first year. Twenty-nine percent of patients developed de novo door-specific antibodies and demonstrated no correlation with AMR. Freedom from CAV at 1 year is 88.5% and at 5 years is 81.0%. Fifty-two percent of donor hearts originated from outside the recipients' geographic and organ donation organization.

CONCLUSIONS

A national strategy of prioritizing highly sensitized heart transplant recipients has demonstrated effective expansion of the donor pool, acceptable short-term survival, freedom from CAV and low rates of clinically relevant AMR. However, we observed significantly higher rates of cellular rejection and de novo donor-specific antibody development in this population. It is currently unknown whether this will translate into poorer long-term outcome.

摘要

背景

移植致敏受者与移植后并发症风险增加相关。2010 年,加拿大心脏移植网络(CCTN)为高度致敏的心脏移植候选者创建了独特的状态列表。4S 状态的列入标准仅为计算的群体反应性抗体(cPRA)水平>80%,通过提供全国范围内的供体来源,从而扩大供体池。本研究描述了在加拿大以 4S 状态进行移植的患者特征和结局。

方法

从加拿大 11 个成人心脏移植中心回顾性收集所有患者的特征和临床结局数据。

结果

2010 年 1 月至 2015 年 9 月期间,96 名患者被列入 4S 状态。其中 52 名患者以 4S 状态接受移植。在这 52 例移植中,平均 cPRA 水平为 93.4%,平均年龄为 47 岁,46%为男性,44%为扩张型心肌病,17%为因心脏同种异体移植血管病(CAV)而再次移植。血型 O 占 42%,53%有左心室辅助装置作为移植桥。9 例(17%)患者接受了脱敏治疗。平均随访 28 个月(1 周至 5.3 年)后,9 例患者(17%)死亡。Kaplan-Meier 1 年生存率为 86%。2 例患者在移植后 1 年内因抗体介导的排斥反应(AMR)接受治疗,33%的患者在第 1 年内至少发生 1 次 ISHLT 分级≥2R 的细胞排斥反应。33%的患者发生了新的门特定抗体,与 AMR 无相关性。1 年时无 CAV 发生率为 88.5%,5 年时为 81.0%。52%的供心来自受者地理和器官捐献组织以外的地区。

结论

一项将高度致敏的心脏移植受者列为优先的国家策略已成功扩大了供体池,实现了可接受的短期生存率、无 CAV 和较低的临床相关 AMR 发生率。然而,我们在该人群中观察到更高的细胞排斥反应和新的供体特异性抗体形成率。目前尚不清楚这是否会转化为较差的长期预后。

相似文献

1
Multicenter evaluation of a national organ sharing policy for highly sensitized patients listed for heart transplantation in Canada.多中心评估加拿大高致敏患者心脏移植名单上的国家器官共享政策。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 May;36(5):491-498. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
2
Impact of organ prioritization for immunologic sensitization and waiting times for heart transplantation.免疫致敏和心脏移植等待时间对器官优先排序的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Mar;38(3):285-294. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.12.016. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
3
Does the Canadian allocation system for highly sensitized patients work?加拿大高度致敏患者的分配系统是否有效?
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2019 Jun;24(3):239-244. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000635.
4
Effect of sensitization in US heart transplant recipients bridged with a ventricular assist device: update in a modern cohort.心脏移植受者在心室辅助装置桥接中的致敏作用:现代队列的更新。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Nov;142(5):1236-45, 1245.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.07.019. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
5
Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies with antibody-mediated rejection and long-term outcomes following heart transplantation.心脏移植后具有抗体介导排斥反应的供体特异性抗HLA抗体及长期预后
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 May;36(5):540-545. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.10.016. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
6
Combination of Total Lymphoid Irradiation, Low-Dose IVIG and ATG as Rescue Therapy for Highly Sensitized and Antibody-Mediated Rejection Renal Transplant Recipients.全淋巴照射、低剂量静脉注射免疫球蛋白和抗胸腺细胞球蛋白联合作为高敏和抗体介导排斥反应肾移植受者的挽救治疗
Clin Transpl. 2014:215-21.
7
Immunologic sensitization in recipients of left ventricular assist devices.左心室辅助装置接受者的免疫致敏
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Mar;125(3):578-91. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2003.30.
8
Managing highly sensitized renal transplant candidates in the era of kidney paired donation and the new kidney allocation system: Is there still a role for desensitization?在肾匹配捐赠和新的肾脏分配系统时代管理高度致敏的肾移植候选者:脱敏治疗是否仍有作用?
Clin Transplant. 2019 Dec;33(12):e13751. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13751. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
9
Novel insights into pretransplant allosensitization in heart transplant recipients in the contemporary era of immunosuppression and rejection surveillance.免疫抑制和排斥反应监测当代时代心脏移植受者移植前同种异体致敏的新见解。
Transpl Int. 2016 Jan;29(1):63-72. doi: 10.1111/tri.12684. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
10
Allocation of the Highest Quality Kidneys and Transplant Outcomes Under the New Kidney Allocation System.新的肾脏分配系统下最优质量肾脏的分配与移植结果。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 May;73(5):605-614. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.12.036. Epub 2019 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Accessing the Impacts of the Calculated Panel Reactive Antibody Value on a Lung Transplant Waitlist: A Latin American Experience.评估计算得出的群体反应性抗体值对肺移植等待名单的影响:拉丁美洲的经验
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 18;14(12):4344. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124344.
2
A gentler approach to monitor for heart transplant rejection.一种监测心脏移植排斥反应的更温和方法。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 6;11:1349376. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1349376. eCollection 2024.
3
Selection and Interpretation of Molecular Diagnostics in Heart Transplantation.
心脏移植中的分子诊断选择与解读。
Circulation. 2023 Aug 22;148(8):679-694. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.062847. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
4
Current Desensitization Strategies in Heart Transplantation.心脏移植中的当前脱敏策略。
Front Immunol. 2021 Aug 24;12:702186. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.702186. eCollection 2021.
5
Increased Calculated Panel Reactive Antigen Is Associated With Increased Waitlist Time and Mortality in Lung Transplantation.计算性 panel reactive antigen 升高与肺移植等待时间延长和死亡率升高相关。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Aug;110(2):414-423. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.02.061. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
6
Effect of Calculated Panel Reactive Antibody Value on Waitlist Outcomes for Lung Transplant Candidates.计算得出的群体反应性抗体值对肺移植候选者等待名单结果的影响。
Ann Transplant. 2019 Jun 28;24:383-392. doi: 10.12659/AOT.915769.