Schacter Daniel L, Madore Kevin P
Harvard University, USA.
Mem Stud. 2016;9(3):245-255. doi: 10.1177/1750698016645230. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
Recent studies have shown that imagining or simulating future events relies on many of the same cognitive and neural processes as remembering past events. According to the constructive episodic simulation hypothesis (Schacter and Addis, 2007), such overlap indicates that both remembered past and imagined future events rely heavily on episodic memory: future simulations are built on retrieved details of specific past experiences that are recombined into novel events. An alternative possibility is that commonalities between remembering and imagining reflect the influence of more general, non-episodic factors such as narrative style or communicative goals that shape the expression of both memory and imagination. We consider recent studies that distinguish the contributions of episodic and non-episodic processes in remembering the past and imagining the future by using an episodic specificity induction - brief training in recollecting the details of a past experience - and also extend this approach to the domains of problem solving and creative thinking. We conclude by suggesting that the specificity induction may target a process of scene construction that contributes to episodic memory as well as to imagination, problem solving, and creative thinking.
最近的研究表明,想象或模拟未来事件所依赖的许多认知和神经过程与回忆过去事件相同。根据建构性情景模拟假说(沙克特和阿迪斯,2007年),这种重叠表明,被回忆的过去事件和想象的未来事件都严重依赖情景记忆:未来模拟基于检索到的特定过去经历的细节,这些细节被重新组合成新的事件。另一种可能性是,记忆和想象之间的共性反映了更一般的、非情景因素的影响,如叙事风格或塑造记忆和想象表达的交流目标。我们考虑了最近的一些研究,这些研究通过使用情景特异性诱导——对过去经历细节的回忆进行简短训练——来区分情景和非情景过程在回忆过去和想象未来中的作用,并将这种方法扩展到问题解决和创造性思维领域。我们最后提出,特异性诱导可能针对一种情景构建过程,这种过程有助于情景记忆以及想象、问题解决和创造性思维。