Madore Kevin P, Schacter Daniel L
a Department of Psychology , Harvard University , Cambridge , MA , USA.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(2):285-98. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.999097. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
According to the constructive episodic simulation hypothesis, remembering past experiences and imagining future experiences both rely heavily on episodic memory. However, recent research indicates that nonepisodic processes such as descriptive ability also influence memory and imagination. We recently found that an episodic specificity induction--brief training in recollecting details of past experiences--enhanced detail generation on memory and imagination tasks but not a picture description task and thereby concluded that the induction can dissociate episodic processes involved in remembering the past and imagining the future from those nonepisodic processes involved in description. To evaluate the generality of our previous findings and to examine the role of generative search in producing those findings, we modified our paradigm so that word cues replaced picture cues, and a word comparison task that requires generation of sentences and word definitions replaced picture description. Young adult participants received either a specificity induction or one of two control inductions before completing the memory, imagination, and word comparison tasks. Replicating and extending our previous work, we found that the specificity induction increased detail generation in memory and imagination without having an effect on word comparison. The induction's selective effect on memory and imagination stemmed from an increase in internal (i.e., on-topic and episodic) details and had no effect on external (e.g., off-topic or semantic) details. The results point to the efficacy of the specificity induction for isolating episodic processes involved in remembering the past and imagining the future even when a nonepisodic task requires generative search.
根据建构性情景模拟假说,回忆过去的经历和想象未来的经历都严重依赖情景记忆。然而,最近的研究表明,描述能力等非情景过程也会影响记忆和想象。我们最近发现,一种情景特异性诱导——对回忆过去经历细节的简短训练——增强了记忆和想象任务中的细节生成,但对图片描述任务没有影响,从而得出结论,这种诱导可以将回忆过去和想象未来所涉及的情景过程与描述中涉及的非情景过程区分开来。为了评估我们之前研究结果的普遍性,并检验生成性搜索在产生这些结果中的作用,我们修改了我们的范式,用单词线索取代图片线索,并用一个需要生成句子和单词定义的单词比较任务取代图片描述。年轻成年参与者在完成记忆、想象和单词比较任务之前,接受了特异性诱导或两种控制诱导之一。重复并扩展我们之前的工作,我们发现特异性诱导增加了记忆和想象中的细节生成,而对单词比较没有影响。这种诱导对记忆和想象的选择性作用源于内部(即与主题相关且情景性的)细节的增加,而对外部(例如与主题无关或语义性的)细节没有影响。结果表明,即使非情景任务需要生成性搜索,特异性诱导对于分离回忆过去和想象未来所涉及的情景过程也是有效的。