Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2013 Jan;4(1):63-79. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1210. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
Research on future-oriented mental time travel (FMTT) is highly active yet somewhat unruly. I believe this is due, in large part, to the complexity of both the tasks used to test FMTT and the concepts involved. Extraordinary care is a necessity when grappling with such complex and perplexing metaphysical constructs as self and time and their co-instantiation in memory. In this review, I first discuss the relation between future mental time travel and types of memory (episodic and semantic). I then examine the nature of both the types of self-knowledge assumed to be projected into the future and the types of temporalities that constitute projective temporal experience. Finally, I argue that a person lacking episodic memory should nonetheless be able to imagine a personal future by virtue of (1) the fact that semantic, as well as episodic, memory can be self-referential, (2) autonoetic awareness is not a prerequisite for FMTT, and (3) semantic memory does, in fact, enable certain forms of personally oriented FMTT. WIREs Cogn Sci 2013, 4:63-79. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1210 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
未来导向心理时间旅行(FMTT)的研究非常活跃,但也有些杂乱无章。我认为,这在很大程度上是由于用于测试 FMTT 的任务和涉及的概念的复杂性造成的。在处理自我和时间等复杂而令人费解的形而上学结构及其在记忆中的同时体现时,需要格外小心。在这篇综述中,我首先讨论了未来心理时间旅行与记忆类型(情节和语义)之间的关系。然后,我考察了假定投射到未来的自我知识类型以及构成投射时间体验的时间类型的性质。最后,我认为,一个缺乏情节记忆的人,应该能够凭借以下事实来想象个人的未来:(1)语义记忆,以及情节记忆,都可以是自我参照的;(2)自传体意识不是 FMTT 的先决条件;(3)语义记忆确实能够实现某些形式的个人导向的 FMTT。WIREs Cogn Sci 2013, 4:63-79. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1210 如需与本文相关的更多资源,请访问 WIREs 网站。