Suppr超能文献

一项随机对照试验,旨在评估元认知训练与心理教育组相比,对近期发病的精神病患者的疗效。

Randomized control trial to assess the efficacy of metacognitive training compared with a psycho-educational group in people with a recent-onset psychosis.

作者信息

Ochoa S, López-Carrilero R, Barrigón M L, Pousa E, Barajas A, Lorente-Rovira E, González-Higueras F, Grasa E, Ruiz-Delgado I, Cid J, Birulés I, Esteban-Pinos I, Casañas R, Luengo A, Torres-Hernández P, Corripio I, Montes-Gámez M, Beltran M, De Apraiz A, Domínguez-Sánchez L, Sánchez E, Llacer B, Pélaez T, Bogas J L, Moritz S

机构信息

Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu,Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona,Spain.

Department of Psychiatry,IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz Hospital,Madrid,Spain.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2017 Jul;47(9):1573-1584. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716003421. Epub 2017 Feb 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aims were to assess the efficacy of metacognitive training (MCT) in people with a recent onset of psychosis in terms of symptoms as a primary outcome and metacognitive variables as a secondary outcome.

METHOD

A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial was performed. A total of 126 patients were randomized to an MCT or a psycho-educational intervention with cognitive-behavioral elements. The sample was composed of people with a recent onset of psychosis, recruited from nine public centers in Spain. The treatment consisted of eight weekly sessions for both groups. Patients were assessed at three time-points: baseline, post-treatment, and at 6 months follow-up. The evaluator was blinded to the condition of the patient. Symptoms were assessed with the PANSS and metacognition was assessed with a battery of questionnaires of cognitive biases and social cognition.

RESULTS

Both MCT and psycho-educational groups had improved symptoms post-treatment and at follow-up, with greater improvements in the MCT group. The MCT group was superior to the psycho-educational group on the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS) total (p = 0.026) and self-certainty (p = 0.035) and dependence self-subscale of irrational beliefs, comparing baseline and post-treatment. Moreover, comparing baseline and follow-up, the MCT group was better than the psycho-educational group in self-reflectiveness on the BCIS (p = 0.047), total BCIS (p = 0.045), and intolerance to frustration (p = 0.014). Jumping to Conclusions (JTC) improved more in the MCT group than the psycho-educational group (p = 0.021). Regarding the comparison within each group, Theory of Mind (ToM), Personalizing Bias, and other subscales of irrational beliefs improved in the MCT group but not the psycho-educational group (p < 0.001-0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

MCT could be an effective psychological intervention for people with recent onset of psychosis in order to improve cognitive insight, JTC, and tolerance to frustration. It seems that MCT could be useful to improve symptoms, ToM, and personalizing bias.

摘要

背景

旨在评估元认知训练(MCT)对近期发病的精神病患者的疗效,将症状作为主要结局,元认知变量作为次要结局。

方法

进行了一项多中心、随机、对照临床试验。总共126名患者被随机分配到MCT组或包含认知行为元素的心理教育干预组。样本由近期发病的精神病患者组成,从西班牙的九个公共中心招募。两组治疗均包括每周一次,共八次治疗课程。在三个时间点对患者进行评估:基线、治疗后和6个月随访。评估者对患者的病情不知情。使用阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)评估症状,使用一系列认知偏差和社会认知问卷评估元认知。

结果

MCT组和心理教育组在治疗后和随访时症状均有改善,MCT组改善更大。比较基线和治疗后,MCT组在贝克认知洞察力量表(BCIS)总分(p = 0.026)、自我确定性(p = 0.035)以及非理性信念的依赖自我子量表上优于心理教育组。此外,比较基线和随访时,MCT组在BCIS的自我反思性(p = 0.047)、BCIS总分(p = 0.045)和挫折不耐受性(p = 0.014)方面优于心理教育组。MCT组在“急于下结论”(JTC)方面比心理教育组改善更大(p = 0.021)。关于每组内的比较,MCT组的心理理论(ToM)、个性化偏差和非理性信念的其他子量表有所改善,而心理教育组没有(p < 0.001 - 0.032)。

结论

MCT可能是一种对近期发病的精神病患者有效的心理干预措施,以改善认知洞察力、JTC和挫折耐受性。似乎MCT可能有助于改善症状、ToM和个性化偏差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验