Cohen A H, Nast C C, Adler S G, Kopple J D
Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance.
Am J Nephrol. 1989;9(4):309-15. doi: 10.1159/000167986.
A prospective study was undertaken to assess the utility of the renal biopsy as a tool in the clinical practice of nephrology. Nephrologists performing this procedure were surveyed concerning prebiopsy diagnosis, plans for therapy and estimation of prognosis, before and after biopsy results were disclosed. On the basis of 108 specimens from both academic centers and community hospitals, clinical and pathological diagnoses differed in 63% and therapeutic approach was altered in 34% of the cases. These results were greatest for nephrotic syndrome and for renal failure of rapid onset. The change in treatment was frequently of major consequence: decisions for the use of corticosteroids, cytotoxic agents and/or plasma exchange were altered based upon biopsy diagnoses. There were no differences either in diagnostic acumen or therapeutic approach between academic and community nephrologists. We conclude that renal biopsies are an important and frequently used part of the nephrologists' approach to patient care.
开展了一项前瞻性研究,以评估肾活检作为肾脏病临床实践工具的效用。在活检结果公布前后,对进行该操作的肾脏病医生就活检前诊断、治疗计划和预后评估进行了调查。基于来自学术中心和社区医院的108份标本,临床诊断与病理诊断在63%的病例中存在差异,34%的病例治疗方法发生了改变。这些结果在肾病综合征和快速发作的肾衰竭中最为明显。治疗的改变往往具有重大影响:基于活检诊断,使用皮质类固醇、细胞毒性药物和/或血浆置换的决定发生了改变。学术性肾脏病医生和社区肾脏病医生在诊断敏锐度或治疗方法上均无差异。我们得出结论,肾活检是肾脏病医生患者护理方法的重要且常用的一部分。