Mikolajewski Amy J, Scheeringa Michael S, Weems Carl F
1 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University School of Medicine , New Orleans, Louisiana.
2 Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Iowa State University , Ames, Iowa.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2017 May;27(4):374-382. doi: 10.1089/cap.2016.0134. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
Few studies have assessed how the diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) apply to older children and adolescents. With the introduction of a new, developmentally sensitive set of criteria for very young children (age 6 years and younger) in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5), this raises new questions about the validity of the criteria for older children and adolescents. The current study investigated how diagnostic changes in DSM-5 impact diagnosis rates in 7-18-year olds.
PTSD, impairment, and comorbid psychopathology were assessed in 135 trauma-exposed, treatment-seeking participants. Children (ages 7-12) were examined separately from adolescents (ages 13-18) to assess for potential developmental differences.
A significantly higher proportion of 7-12-year-old children met criteria for DSM-5 diagnosis (53%) compared to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) (37%). However, among 13-18-year-old adolescents, the proportions diagnosed with DSM-5 (73%) and DSM-IV (74%) did not differ. Participants who met criteria for DSM-5 only (17%) did not differ from those diagnosed with DSM-IV in terms impairment or comorbidity. Using the newly accepted age 6 years and younger criteria resulted in a significantly higher proportion of 7-12-year-old (but not 13-18-year olds) children meeting criteria compared to DSM-IV or DSM-5. However, these children showed less impairment and comorbidity than those diagnosed with DSM-IV.
These findings suggest that DSM-5 criteria may be more developmentally sensitive than DSM-IV criteria, and may lead to higher prevalence rates of PTSD for 7-12-year-old children, but not for adolescents. Using the very young children criteria for 7-12-year-old children may further increase prevalence, but capture children with less severe psychopathology.
很少有研究评估创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的诊断标准如何适用于大龄儿童和青少年。随着《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)中引入了一套针对幼儿(6岁及以下)的、对发育敏感的新标准,这引发了关于大龄儿童和青少年标准有效性的新问题。本研究调查了DSM-5中的诊断变化如何影响7至18岁儿童的诊断率。
对135名遭受创伤且寻求治疗的参与者进行了PTSD、功能损害和共病精神病理学评估。将儿童(7至12岁)与青少年(13至18岁)分开检查,以评估潜在的发育差异。
与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)(37%)相比,7至12岁儿童中符合DSM-5诊断标准的比例(53%)显著更高。然而,在13至18岁的青少年中,被诊断为DSM-5(73%)和DSM-IV(74%)的比例没有差异。仅符合DSM-5标准的参与者(17%)在功能损害或共病方面与被诊断为DSM-IV的参与者没有差异。与DSM-IV或DSM-5相比,使用新认可的6岁及以下标准导致7至12岁儿童(但不是13至18岁儿童)中符合标准的比例显著更高。然而,这些儿童的功能损害和共病情况比被诊断为DSM-IV的儿童要轻。
这些发现表明,DSM-5标准可能比DSM-IV标准对发育更敏感,可能导致7至12岁儿童中PTSD的患病率更高,但对青少年则不然。对7至12岁儿童使用幼儿标准可能会进一步提高患病率,但筛查出的是精神病理学较轻的儿童。