Danzi BreAnne A, Knowles Ellen A, Bock Rachel C
Department of Psychology, University of South Dakota, 414 E. Clark St, Vermillion, SD, USA.
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Jan 11;25(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05317-6.
Competing definitions of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have been proposed by ICD-11 and DSM-5; it is unclear which diagnostic model works best for children and adolescents. Although other studies have predicted the impact of these models by approximating the criteria using older measures, this study advances the research by comparing measures designed to assess ICD-11 and DSM-5 criteria in hurricane-exposed youth. This study evaluates ICD-11 and DSM-5 (both the standard and preschool-age) diagnostic models by identifying diagnostic rates, evaluating diagnostic concordance, investigating the predictive value of constructs associated with PTSD (demographics, disaster threat and exposure, functional impairment), and examining model fit.
The sample was exposed to Hurricane Ian (2022), a deadly Category 5 hurricane. Parents reported on disaster exposure and their child's PTSD symptoms (n = 152; ages 7-17) using the International Trauma Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents Caregiver Version (ITQ-CG) for ICD-11 criteria and UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-5, Parent/Caregiver Report Version (RI-5) for DSM-5 criteria.
ICD-11 PTSD symptom criteria rates were 24% and dropped to 20% when the impairment criterion was added. PTSD symptom criteria rates were 11% (10% with impairment) for DSM-5 and 13% (12% with impairment) for DSM-5 Preschool. ICD-11 rates were higher than DSM-5 and DSM-5 Preschool rates. There was no difference between DSM-5 and DSM-5 Preschool rates of PTSD. There was moderate to substantial concordance between ICD-11 and the DSM-5 models. All diagnostic models were associated with exposure and impairment, but only ICD-11 was associated with threat. ICD-11 was the only one to evidence acceptable model fit.
Using the ITQ-CG and RI-5 to assess PTSD in youth, results showed higher PTSD diagnostic rates for ICD-11 than DSM-5; this contradicts prior findings (based off approximated ICD-11 criteria) and seems largely due to differences in symptom thresholds used by the two measures. The ITQ-CG exhibited excellent model fit and was associated with several constructs important to PTSD.
国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)对创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)提出了相互竞争的定义;目前尚不清楚哪种诊断模型最适用于儿童和青少年。尽管其他研究通过使用旧的测量方法近似标准来预测这些模型的影响,但本研究通过比较旨在评估飓风暴露青年中ICD - 11和DSM - 5标准的测量方法推进了该研究。本研究通过确定诊断率、评估诊断一致性、调查与PTSD相关的构念(人口统计学、灾难威胁和暴露、功能损害)的预测价值以及检验模型拟合度来评估ICD - 11和DSM - 5(包括标准版本和学龄前版本)的诊断模型。
样本来自于2022年的致命5级飓风伊恩。父母使用针对ICD - 11标准的《儿童和青少年照顾者版国际创伤问卷》(ITQ - CG)以及针对DSM - 5标准的《加州大学洛杉矶分校PTSD反应指数,父母/照顾者报告版》(RI - 5)报告灾难暴露情况及其孩子的PTSD症状(n = 152;年龄7 - 17岁)。
ICD - 11的PTSD症状标准率为24%,当加入损害标准时降至20%。DSM - 5的PTSD症状标准率为11%(有损害时为10%),DSM - 5学龄前版本的为13%(有损害时为12%)。ICD - 11的比率高于DSM - 5和DSM - 5学龄前版本的比率。DSM - 5和DSM - 5学龄前版本的PTSD比率没有差异。ICD - 11和DSM - 5模型之间存在中度到高度的一致性。所有诊断模型都与暴露和损害相关,但只有ICD - 11与威胁相关。ICD - 11是唯一证明模型拟合度可接受的。
使用ITQ - CG和RI - 5评估青少年的PTSD,结果显示ICD - 11的PTSD诊断率高于DSM - 5;这与先前的研究结果(基于近似的ICD - 11标准)相矛盾,这似乎主要是由于两种测量方法使用的症状阈值不同。ITQ - CG表现出出色的模型拟合度,并且与几个对PTSD很重要的构念相关。