Chu Jason K, Rindler Rima S, Pradilla Gustavo, Rodts Gerald E, Ahmad Faiz U
Department of Neurological Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Neurosurgery. 2017 Feb 1;80(2):171-179. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw056.
Flexion-distraction injuries (FDI) represent 5% to 15% of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. Treatment depends on the extent of ligamentous involvement: osseous/Magerl type B2 injuries can be managed conservatively, while ligamentous/Magerl type B1 injuries undergo stabilization with arthrodesis. Minimally invasive surgery without arthrodesis can achieve similar outcomes to open procedures. This has been studied for burst fractures; however, its role in FDI is unclear.
To conduct a systematic review of the literature that examined minimally invasive surgery instrumentation without arthrodesis for traumatic FDI of the thoracolumbar spine.
Four electronic databases were searched, and articles were screened using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines for patients with traumatic FDI of the thoracolumbar spine treated with percutaneous techniques without arthrodesis and had postoperative follow-up.
Seven studies with 44 patients met inclusion criteria. There were 19 patients with osseous FDI and 25 with ligamentous FDI. When reported, patients (n = 39) were neurologically intact preoperatively and at follow-up. Osseous FDI patients underwent instrumentation at 2 levels, while ligamentous injuries at approximately 4 levels. Complication rate was 2.3%. All patients had at least 6 mo of follow-up and demonstrated healing on follow-up imaging.
Percutaneous instrumentation without arthrodesis represents a low-risk intermediate between conservative management and open instrumented fusion. This “internal bracing” can be used in osseous and ligamentous FDIs. Neurologically intact patients who do not require decompression and those that may not tolerate or fail conservative management may be candidates. The current level of evidence cannot provide official recommendations and future studies are required to investigate long-term safety and efficacy.
屈曲牵张性损伤(FDI)占创伤性胸腰椎骨折的5%至15%。治疗取决于韧带受累程度:骨损伤/Magerl B2型损伤可保守治疗,而韧带损伤/Magerl B1型损伤则需行融合内固定术。不进行融合的微创手术可取得与开放手术相似的效果。这已在爆裂骨折中得到研究;然而,其在FDI中的作用尚不清楚。
对有关不进行融合的微创手术器械治疗胸腰椎创伤性FDI的文献进行系统评价。
检索四个电子数据库,并根据PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南筛选文章,纳入采用经皮技术且不进行融合治疗胸腰椎创伤性FDI并进行术后随访的患者。
七项研究共44例患者符合纳入标准。其中骨损伤性FDI患者19例,韧带损伤性FDI患者25例。报告显示,39例患者术前及随访时神经功能均完整。骨损伤性FDI患者进行了2节段的内固定,而韧带损伤患者约为4节段。并发症发生率为2.3%。所有患者至少随访6个月,随访影像学显示愈合良好。
不进行融合的经皮内固定术是保守治疗和开放内固定融合术之间的低风险中间选择。这种“内部支撑”可用于骨损伤性和韧带损伤性FDI。神经功能完整、不需要减压且不能耐受或保守治疗失败的患者可能适合。目前的证据水平无法提供官方建议,需要进一步研究以探讨长期安全性和有效性。