Taylor Jeffrey B, Nguyen Anh-Dung, Paterno Mark V, Huang Bin, Ford Kevin R
Department of Physical Therapy, Congdon School of Health Sciences, High Point University, High Point, NC, 27268, USA.
Department of Athletic Training, Congdon School of Health Sciences, High Point University, High Point, NC, USA.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Feb 7;18(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1436-1.
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in female athletes lead to a variety of short- and long-term physical, financial, and psychosocial ramifications. While dedicated injury prevention training programs have shown promise, ACL injury rates remain high as implementation has not become widespread. Conventional prevention programs use a combination of resistance, plyometric, balance and agility training to improve high-risk biomechanics and reduce the risk of injury. While many of these programs focus on reducing knee abduction load and posture during dynamic activity, targeting hip extensor strength and utilization may be more efficacious, as it is theorized to be an underlying mechanism of injury in adolescent female athletes. Biofeedback training may complement traditional preventive training, but has not been widely studied in connection with ACL injuries. We hypothesize that biofeedback may be needed to maximize the effectiveness of neuromuscular prophylactic interventions, and that hip-focused biofeedback will improve lower extremity biomechanics to a larger extent than knee-focused biofeedback during dynamic sport-specific tasks and long-term movement strategies.
This is an assessor-blind, randomized control trial of 150 adolescent competitive female (9-19 years) soccer players. Each participant receives 3x/week neuromuscular preventive training and 1x/week biofeedback, the mode depending on their randomization to one of 3 biofeedback groups (hip-focused, knee-focused, sham). The primary aim is to assess the impact of biofeedback training on knee abduction moments (the primary biomechanical predictor of future ACL injury) during double-leg landings, single-leg landings, and unplanned cutting. Testing will occur immediately before the training intervention, immediately after the training intervention, and 6 months after the training intervention to assess the long-term retention of modified biomechanics. Secondary aims will assess performance changes, including hip and core strength, power, and agility, and the extent to which maturation effects biofeedback efficacy.
The results of the Real-time Optimized Biofeedback Utilizing Sport Techniques (ROBUST) trial will help complement current preventive training and may lead to clinician-friendly methods of biofeedback to incorporate into widespread training practices.
Date of publication in ClinicalTrials.gov: 20/04/2016. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02754700 .
女性运动员前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤会导致一系列短期和长期的身体、经济及心理社会影响。虽然专门的损伤预防训练项目已显示出前景,但由于尚未广泛实施,ACL损伤率仍然很高。传统的预防项目结合了阻力训练、增强式训练、平衡训练和敏捷性训练,以改善高风险生物力学并降低受伤风险。虽然这些项目中的许多都侧重于在动态活动期间降低膝关节外展负荷和姿势,但针对髋部伸肌力量及其利用情况可能更有效,因为从理论上讲,这是青少年女性运动员受伤的潜在机制。生物反馈训练可能会补充传统的预防性训练,但尚未针对ACL损伤进行广泛研究。我们假设可能需要生物反馈来最大化神经肌肉预防性干预的效果,并且在动态的特定运动任务和长期运动策略中,专注于髋部的生物反馈比专注于膝盖的生物反馈能在更大程度上改善下肢生物力学。
这是一项对150名青少年竞技女性(9 - 19岁)足球运动员进行的评估者盲法随机对照试验。每位参与者每周接受3次神经肌肉预防性训练和1次生物反馈训练,训练模式取决于她们被随机分配到3个生物反馈组(专注于髋部、专注于膝盖、假训练组)中的哪一组。主要目的是评估生物反馈训练对双腿落地、单腿落地和无计划变向时膝关节外展力矩(未来ACL损伤的主要生物力学预测指标)的影响。测试将在训练干预前、训练干预后立即进行,以及训练干预后6个月进行,以评估改良生物力学的长期保持情况。次要目的将评估性能变化,包括髋部和核心力量、功率和敏捷性,以及成熟度对生物反馈效果的影响程度。
利用运动技术进行实时优化生物反馈(ROBUST)试验的结果将有助于补充当前的预防性训练,并可能产生临床医生易于采用的生物反馈方法,以纳入广泛的训练实践中。
在ClinicalTrials.gov上发布的日期:2016年4月20日。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02754700 。