Suppr超能文献

对痴呆进行二分法分类:是否有其他方法?

Dichotomising dementia: is there another way?

作者信息

McParland Patricia, Kelly Fiona, Innes Anthea

机构信息

School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.

Division of Nursing, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Sociol Health Illn. 2017 Feb;39(2):258-269. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12438.

Abstract

This article discusses the reduction of the complex experience of dementia to a dichotomised 'tragedy' or 'living well' discourse in contemporary Western society. We explore both discourses, placing them in the context of a successful ageing paradigm, highlighting the complex nature of dementia and the risks associated with the emergence of these arguably competing discourses. Specifically, we explore this dichotomy in the context of societal understandings and responses to dementia. We argue for an acceptance of the fluid nature of the dementia experience, and the importance of an understanding that recognises the multiple realities of dementia necessary for social inclusion to occur. Such an acceptance requires that, rather than defend one position over another, the current discourse on dementia is challenged and problematised so that a more nuanced understanding of dementia may emerge; one that fully accepts the paradoxical nature of this complex condition.

摘要

本文探讨了在当代西方社会中,痴呆症这一复杂体验如何被简化为一种二元化的“悲剧”或“美好生活”话语。我们对这两种话语都进行了探讨,将它们置于成功老龄化范式的背景下,突出痴呆症的复杂本质以及这些可说是相互竞争的话语出现所带来的风险。具体而言,我们在社会对痴呆症的理解和应对背景下探究这种二元对立。我们主张接受痴呆症体验的流动性,以及认识到痴呆症的多重现实对于实现社会包容的重要性。这种接受要求,当前关于痴呆症的话语不应捍卫一种立场而非另一种立场,而是要受到挑战并被问题化,以便可能出现对痴呆症更细致入微的理解;一种能充分接受这种复杂状况的矛盾本质的理解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验