Lopez-Berestein G, Bodey G P, Fainstein V, Keating M, Frankel L S, Zeluff B, Gentry L, Mehta K
Division of Medicine, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030.
Arch Intern Med. 1989 Nov;149(11):2533-6.
Forty-six patients with systemic fungal infections were treated with liposomal amphotericin B. Twenty-one patients had disseminated candidiasis, 19 had aspergillosis, and the rest had a variety of other fungal infections. Forty patients failed to respond to conventional amphotericin B therapy, and 6 patients were given liposomal amphotericin B because conventional amphotericin B caused severe side effects. Twenty-four patients had a complete response, and 22 patients failed to respond. No short- or long-term toxic reactions were observed. The acute side effects such as fever, chills, and potassium loss were infrequent and milder than those commonly observed with conventional amphotericin B. No chronic renal, hematologic, or central nervous system side effects were observed. Liposomal amphotericin B therapy was effective and less toxic than conventional amphotericin B therapy.
46例系统性真菌感染患者接受了脂质体两性霉素B治疗。21例患者患有播散性念珠菌病,19例患有曲霉病,其余患者患有各种其他真菌感染。40例患者对传统两性霉素B治疗无效,6例患者因传统两性霉素B引起严重副作用而接受脂质体两性霉素B治疗。24例患者完全缓解,22例患者治疗无效。未观察到短期或长期毒性反应。发热、寒战和钾流失等急性副作用很少见,且比传统两性霉素B常见的副作用轻。未观察到慢性肾脏、血液学或中枢神经系统副作用。脂质体两性霉素B治疗有效,且比传统两性霉素B治疗毒性小。