Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
Dig Endosc. 2017 Sep;29(6):712-717. doi: 10.1111/den.12837. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
The clinical impact of catheter-based radiofrequency ablation (RFA) under endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) guidance has recently been reported; however, severe adverse events have also been noted. If tumor is not present in the biliary tract, severe adverse events such as perforation or bleeding as a result of vessel injury around the biliary tract may occur. In addition, the effectiveness of RFA may not be sufficient based solely on radiographic guidance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the actual feasibility of intraductal RFA by peroral cholangioscope (POCS) evaluation before/after RFA.
In this retrospective study carried out between July and September 2016, consecutive patients who underwent RFA for malignant biliary stricture and POCS evaluation before/after RFA were enrolled. Primary endpoint of this study was technical feasibility of RFA, which was evaluated by POCS. Secondary endpoints were rates and types of adverse event.
A total of 12 consecutive patients were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Stent placement using uncovered metal stents had been previously done in six patients before RFA. Tumor was seen in the biliary tract in all patients. RFA was technically successful in all patients, and clinical success was confirmed in all patients by POCS imaging. Adverse events were seen in only one patient. Median stent patency was 154 days.
RFA for malignant biliary stricture may be safe. To confirm the feasibility and efficacy of RFA, additional cases, prospective studies, and a comparison study between with and without endobiliary RFA are needed.
内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)引导下经皮射频消融(RFA)的临床影响最近已有报道;然而,也有严重的不良事件发生。如果胆管内没有肿瘤,可能会发生胆管周围血管损伤导致的穿孔或出血等严重不良事件。此外,单纯依靠影像学引导,RFA 的效果可能不够充分。本研究旨在通过经口胆道镜(POCS)评估 RFA 前后,评估经胆管内 RFA 的实际可行性。
本回顾性研究于 2016 年 7 月至 9 月进行,连续纳入因恶性胆管狭窄而行 RFA 并在 RFA 前后进行 POCS 评估的患者。本研究的主要终点是通过 POCS 评估 RFA 的技术可行性。次要终点是不良事件的发生率和类型。
本研究共回顾性纳入 12 例连续患者。在 RFA 之前,有 6 例患者已先行使用未覆膜金属支架置入术。所有患者的胆管内均可见肿瘤。所有患者的 RFA 均技术成功,所有患者均通过 POCS 影像学确认临床成功。仅 1 例患者出现不良事件。中位支架通畅时间为 154 天。
RFA 治疗恶性胆管狭窄可能是安全的。为了确认 RFA 的可行性和疗效,需要更多的病例、前瞻性研究以及有和无胆管内 RFA 的比较研究。