Aschenbrenner Andrew J, Balota David A, Weigand Alexandra J, Scaltritti Michele, Besner Derek
Psychological and Brain Sciences.
Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, LPC.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Apr;43(4):700-718. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000342. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
A prominent question in visual word recognition is whether letters within a word are processed in parallel or in a left to right sequence. Although most contemporary models posit parallel processing, this notion seems at odds with well-established serial position effects in word identification that indicate preferential processing for the initial letter. The present study reports 4 experiments designed to further probe the locus of the first position processing advantage. The paradigm involved masked target words presented for short durations and required participants to subsequently select from 2 alternatives, 1 which was identical to the target and 1 that differed by a single letter. Experiment 1 manipulated the case between the target and the alternatives to ensure that previous evidence for a first position effect was not due to simple perceptual matching. The results continued to yield a robust first position advantage. Experiment 2 attempted to eliminate postperceptual decision processes as the explanatory mechanism by presenting single letters as targets and requiring participants to select an entire word that contained the target letter at different positions. Here the first position advantage was eliminated, suggesting postperceptual decision processes do not underlie the effect. The final 2 experiments presented masked stimuli either all vertically (Experiment 3) or randomly intermixed vertical and horizontal orientation (Experiment 4). In both cases, a robust first position advantage was still obtained. The authors consider alternative interpretations of this effect and suggest that these results are consistent with a rapid deployment of spatial attention to the beginning of a target string which occurs poststimulus onset. (PsycINFO Database Record
在视觉单词识别中一个突出的问题是,单词中的字母是并行处理还是从左到右按顺序处理。尽管大多数当代模型假定是并行处理,但这一概念似乎与单词识别中已确立的序列位置效应相矛盾,该效应表明对首字母存在优先处理。本研究报告了4个实验,旨在进一步探究首字母位置处理优势的根源。实验范式包括呈现持续时间较短的掩蔽目标单词,并要求参与者随后从两个选项中进行选择,一个与目标相同,另一个与目标相差一个字母。实验1对目标和选项之间的大小写进行了操控,以确保先前关于首字母位置效应的证据并非源于简单的感知匹配。结果仍然产生了强大的首字母位置优势。实验2试图通过将单个字母作为目标呈现,并要求参与者选择包含目标字母在不同位置的完整单词,来消除感知后决策过程作为解释机制。在这里,首字母位置优势被消除了,这表明感知后决策过程并非该效应的基础。最后两个实验要么全部垂直呈现掩蔽刺激(实验3),要么随机混合垂直和水平方向呈现(实验4)。在这两种情况下,仍然获得了强大的首字母位置优势。作者考虑了对这一效应的其他解释,并表明这些结果与刺激开始后迅速将空间注意力部署到目标字符串开头的情况一致。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》 )