Suppr超能文献

视觉单词识别中的首字母位置效应:空间注意力的作用。

The first letter position effect in visual word recognition: The role of spatial attention.

作者信息

Aschenbrenner Andrew J, Balota David A, Weigand Alexandra J, Scaltritti Michele, Besner Derek

机构信息

Psychological and Brain Sciences.

Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, LPC.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Apr;43(4):700-718. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000342. Epub 2017 Feb 9.

Abstract

A prominent question in visual word recognition is whether letters within a word are processed in parallel or in a left to right sequence. Although most contemporary models posit parallel processing, this notion seems at odds with well-established serial position effects in word identification that indicate preferential processing for the initial letter. The present study reports 4 experiments designed to further probe the locus of the first position processing advantage. The paradigm involved masked target words presented for short durations and required participants to subsequently select from 2 alternatives, 1 which was identical to the target and 1 that differed by a single letter. Experiment 1 manipulated the case between the target and the alternatives to ensure that previous evidence for a first position effect was not due to simple perceptual matching. The results continued to yield a robust first position advantage. Experiment 2 attempted to eliminate postperceptual decision processes as the explanatory mechanism by presenting single letters as targets and requiring participants to select an entire word that contained the target letter at different positions. Here the first position advantage was eliminated, suggesting postperceptual decision processes do not underlie the effect. The final 2 experiments presented masked stimuli either all vertically (Experiment 3) or randomly intermixed vertical and horizontal orientation (Experiment 4). In both cases, a robust first position advantage was still obtained. The authors consider alternative interpretations of this effect and suggest that these results are consistent with a rapid deployment of spatial attention to the beginning of a target string which occurs poststimulus onset. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

在视觉单词识别中一个突出的问题是,单词中的字母是并行处理还是从左到右按顺序处理。尽管大多数当代模型假定是并行处理,但这一概念似乎与单词识别中已确立的序列位置效应相矛盾,该效应表明对首字母存在优先处理。本研究报告了4个实验,旨在进一步探究首字母位置处理优势的根源。实验范式包括呈现持续时间较短的掩蔽目标单词,并要求参与者随后从两个选项中进行选择,一个与目标相同,另一个与目标相差一个字母。实验1对目标和选项之间的大小写进行了操控,以确保先前关于首字母位置效应的证据并非源于简单的感知匹配。结果仍然产生了强大的首字母位置优势。实验2试图通过将单个字母作为目标呈现,并要求参与者选择包含目标字母在不同位置的完整单词,来消除感知后决策过程作为解释机制。在这里,首字母位置优势被消除了,这表明感知后决策过程并非该效应的基础。最后两个实验要么全部垂直呈现掩蔽刺激(实验3),要么随机混合垂直和水平方向呈现(实验4)。在这两种情况下,仍然获得了强大的首字母位置优势。作者考虑了对这一效应的其他解释,并表明这些结果与刺激开始后迅速将空间注意力部署到目标字符串开头的情况一致。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》 )

相似文献

1
The first letter position effect in visual word recognition: The role of spatial attention.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Apr;43(4):700-718. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000342. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
2
Are all letters really processed equally and in parallel? Further evidence of a robust first letter advantage.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Oct;144(2):397-410. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.018. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
3
Assessing the influence of letter position in reading normal and transposed texts using a letter detection task.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2012 Dec;66(4):227-38. doi: 10.1037/a0028494. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
4
Parafoveal letter-position coding in reading.
Mem Cognit. 2018 May;46(4):589-599. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0786-0.
5
Can letter position encoding be modified by visual perceptual elements?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Jun;72(6):1344-1353. doi: 10.1177/1747021818789876. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
6
Implied reading direction and prioritization of letter encoding.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Oct;146(10):1420-1437. doi: 10.1037/xge0000357. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
7
Stimulus orientation and the first-letter advantage.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Feb;183:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.12.009. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
8
Conflict resolved: On the role of spatial attention in reading and color naming tasks.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1709-16. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0830-7.
9
Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Feb;33(1):209-29. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.209.
10
Task-dependent modulation of neglect dyslexia? Novel evidence from the viewing position effect.
Brain Res. 2008 Jan 16;1189:166-78. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.069. Epub 2007 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The sequence effect: Character position processing in Chinese words.
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 5;13:877627. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877627. eCollection 2022.
2
Some further clarifications on age-related differences in the Stroop task: New evidence from the two-to-one Stroop paradigm.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Apr;29(2):492-500. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02011-x. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
3
Letter and word identification in the fovea and parafovea.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Jul;83(5):2071-2082. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02273-6. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
4
Developmental Differences in the Relationship Between Visual Attention Span and Chinese Reading Fluency.
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 6;10:2450. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02450. eCollection 2019.
5
Deepening understanding of language through synaesthesia: a call to reform and expand.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Dec 9;374(1787):20180350. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0350. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
6
Effects of adult aging on letter position coding in reading: Evidence from eye movements.
Psychol Aging. 2019 Jun;34(4):598-612. doi: 10.1037/pag0000342. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
7
Orthographic and phonological priming effects in the same-different task.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Nov;44(11):1661-1671. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000548. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
9
Stimulus orientation and the first-letter advantage.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Feb;183:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.12.009. Epub 2018 Jan 3.

本文引用的文献

1
A developmental investigation of the first-letter advantage.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Dec;152:161-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.07.016. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
2
A Vision of Reading.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Mar;20(3):171-179. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.12.008. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
3
Automaticity revisited: when print doesn't activate semantics.
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 10;6:117. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00117. eCollection 2015.
4
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
5
Are all letters really processed equally and in parallel? Further evidence of a robust first letter advantage.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Oct;144(2):397-410. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.018. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
6
The importance of the first and last letter in words during sentence reading.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Nov;141(3):336-51. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.09.013. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
7
Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits, symbols, and shapes in peripheral vision.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Oct;141(2):149-58. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 8.
8
A causal link between visual spatial attention and reading acquisition.
Curr Biol. 2012 May 8;22(9):814-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.013. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
9
Letters in time and retinotopic space.
Psychol Rev. 2011 Oct;118(4):570-82. doi: 10.1037/a0024811.
10
Letters in words are read simultaneously, not in left-to-right sequence.
Psychol Sci. 2010 Dec;21(12):1799-801. doi: 10.1177/0956797610387442. Epub 2010 Oct 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验