Rewell Sarah S J, Churilov Leonid, Sidon T Kate, Aleksoska Elena, Cox Susan F, Macleod Malcolm R, Howells David W
Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne Brain Centre, Austin Campus, Heidelberg, Australia.
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 9;12(2):e0171688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171688. eCollection 2017.
Key disparities between the timing and methods of assessment in animal stroke studies and clinical trial may be part of the reason for the failure to translate promising findings. This study investigates the development of ischemic damage after thread occlusion MCAo in the rat, using histological and behavioural outcomes. Using the adhesive removal test we investigate the longevity of behavioural deficit after ischemic stroke in rats, and examine the practicality of using such measures as the primary outcome for future studies. Ischemic stroke was induced in 132 Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats which were assessed for behavioural and histological deficits at 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 days, 12 and 24 weeks (n>11 per timepoint). The basic behavioural score confirmed induction of stroke, with deficits specific to stroke animals. Within 7 days, these deficits resolved in 50% of animals. The adhesive removal test revealed contralateral neglect for up to 6 months following stroke. Sample size calculations to facilitate the use of this test as the primary experimental outcome resulted in cohort sizes much larger than are the norm for experimental studies. Histological damage progressed from a necrotic infarct to a hypercellular area that cleared to leave a fluid filled cavity. Whilst absolute volume of damage changed over time, when corrected for changes in hemispheric volume, an equivalent area of damage was lost at all timepoints. Using behavioural measures at chronic timepoints presents significant challenges to the basic science community in terms of the large number of animals required and the practicalities associated with this. Multicentre preclinical randomised controlled trials as advocated by the MultiPART consortium may be the only practical way to deal with this issue.
动物中风研究与临床试验在评估时间和方法上的关键差异可能是未能将有前景的研究结果转化应用的部分原因。本研究利用组织学和行为学结果,调查大鼠大脑中动脉闭塞线栓法诱导缺血性损伤后的发展情况。我们使用黏附去除试验研究大鼠缺血性中风后行为缺陷的持续时间,并检验将此类指标用作未来研究主要结局指标的实用性。对132只自发性高血压大鼠进行大脑中动脉闭塞诱导缺血性中风,并在第1、3、7、14、21、28天、12周和24周评估其行为和组织学缺陷(每个时间点n>11)。基本行为评分证实中风已诱导成功,且中风动物存在特定缺陷。7天内,50%的动物这些缺陷消失。黏附去除试验显示中风后长达6个月存在对侧忽视。为便于将此试验用作主要实验结局而进行的样本量计算得出的队列规模远大于实验研究的常规规模。组织学损伤从坏死性梗死发展为细胞增多区域,然后清除形成充满液体的腔隙。虽然损伤的绝对体积随时间变化,但校正半球体积变化后,所有时间点损失的损伤面积相当。在慢性时间点使用行为学指标对基础科学界来说在所需动物数量以及与之相关的实际操作方面都面临重大挑战。由MultiPART联盟倡导的多中心临床前随机对照试验可能是解决这一问题的唯一可行方法。