• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2010 - 2014年在华盛顿州西雅图市对低收入糖尿病成年患者开展社区卫生工作者自我管理支持干预的随机对照试验

Randomized Controlled Trial of a Community Health Worker Self-Management Support Intervention Among Low-Income Adults With Diabetes, Seattle, Washington, 2010-2014.

作者信息

Nelson Karin, Taylor Leslie, Silverman Julie, Kiefer Meghan, Hebert Paul, Lessler Dan, Krieger James

机构信息

VA Health Services Research and Development, Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, Washington.

VA Puget Sound Health Care System, General Internal Medicine Service, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Feb 9;14:E15. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.160344.

DOI:10.5888/pcd14.160344
PMID:28182863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5303652/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Community health workers (CHWs) can improve diabetes outcomes; however, questions remain about translating research findings into practical low-intensity models for safety-net providers. We tested the effectiveness of a home-based low-intensity CHW intervention for improving health outcomes among low-income adults with diabetes.

METHODS

Low-income patients with glycated hemoglobin A (HbA) of 8.0% or higher in the 12 months before enrollment from 3 safety-net providers were randomized to a 12-month CHW-delivered diabetes self-management intervention or usual care. CHWs were based at a local health department. The primary outcome was change in HbA from baseline enrollment to 12 months; secondary outcomes included blood pressure and lipid levels, quality of life, and health care use.

RESULTS

The change in HbA in the intervention group (n = 145) (unadjusted mean of 9.09% to 8.58%, change of -0.51) compared with the control group (n = 142) (9.04% to 8.71%, change of -0.33) was not significant (P = .54). In an analysis of participants with poor glycemic control (HbA >10%), the intervention group had a 1.23-point greater decrease in HbA compared with controls (P = .046). For the entire study population, we found a decrease in reported physician visits (P < .001) and no improvement in health-related quality of life (P = .07) in the intervention group compared with the control group.

CONCLUSION

A low-intensity CHW-delivered intervention to support diabetes self-management did not significantly improve HbA relative to usual care. Among the subgroup of participants with poor glycemic control (HbA >10% at baseline), the intervention was effective.

摘要

引言

社区卫生工作者(CHW)能够改善糖尿病治疗效果;然而,对于如何将研究结果转化为安全网提供者可采用的实用低强度模式,仍存在疑问。我们测试了一项基于家庭的低强度CHW干预措施对改善低收入糖尿病成年人健康结局的有效性。

方法

来自3个安全网提供者的低收入患者,若在入组前12个月糖化血红蛋白A(HbA)≥8.0%,则被随机分为接受为期12个月的由CHW提供的糖尿病自我管理干预组或常规治疗组。CHW隶属于当地卫生部门。主要结局指标为从基线入组至12个月时HbA的变化;次要结局指标包括血压、血脂水平、生活质量和医疗保健利用情况。

结果

干预组(n = 145)HbA的变化(未调整均值从9.09%降至8.58%,变化值为 -0.51)与对照组(n = 142)(从9.04%降至8.71%,变化值为 -0.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd52/5303652/7438df318b24/PCD-14-E15s02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd52/5303652/111408fd0c2f/PCD-14-E15s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd52/5303652/7438df318b24/PCD-14-E15s02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd52/5303652/111408fd0c2f/PCD-14-E15s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd52/5303652/7438df318b24/PCD-14-E15s02.jpg

相似文献

1
Randomized Controlled Trial of a Community Health Worker Self-Management Support Intervention Among Low-Income Adults With Diabetes, Seattle, Washington, 2010-2014.2010 - 2014年在华盛顿州西雅图市对低收入糖尿病成年患者开展社区卫生工作者自我管理支持干预的随机对照试验
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Feb 9;14:E15. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.160344.
2
Community health worker home visits for adults with uncontrolled asthma: the HomeBASE Trial randomized clinical trial.社区卫生工作者对未控制的哮喘成人进行家庭访视:HomeBASE 试验随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jan;175(1):109-17. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6353.
3
Outcomes at 18 Months From a Community Health Worker and Peer Leader Diabetes Self-Management Program for Latino Adults.社区健康工作者和同伴领导的糖尿病自我管理计划对拉丁裔成年人的 18 个月结果。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jul;41(7):1414-1422. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0978. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
4
Improvements in physical activity and some dietary behaviors in a community health worker-led diabetes self-management intervention for adults with low incomes: results from a randomized controlled trial.社区卫生工作者主导的针对低收入成年人的糖尿病自我管理干预措施在提高身体活动和某些饮食行为方面的改善:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Dec 14;11(12):2144-2154. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab113.
5
Peer Support for Achieving Independence in Diabetes (Peer-AID): design, methods and baseline characteristics of a randomized controlled trial of community health worker assisted diabetes self-management support.同伴支持促进糖尿病患者实现独立(同伴援助):社区卫生工作者协助糖尿病自我管理支持的随机对照试验的设计、方法和基线特征
Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jul;38(2):361-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
6
Observational stepped-wedge analysis of a community health worker-led intervention for diabetes and hypertension in rural Mexico.观察性社区卫生工作者主导的糖尿病和高血压干预在墨西哥农村的递进式楔形分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 8;10(3):e034749. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034749.
7
Effect of a Community Health Worker-Led Multicomponent Intervention on Blood Pressure Control in Low-Income Patients in Argentina: A Randomized Clinical Trial.社区卫生工作者主导的多组分干预对阿根廷低收入患者血压控制的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2017 Sep 19;318(11):1016-1025. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11358.
8
Community Health Workers Supporting Clinical Pharmacists in Diabetes Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial.社区卫生工作者支持临床药师参与糖尿病管理:一项随机对照试验。
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Jan;38(1):58-68. doi: 10.1002/phar.2058. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
9
A Low-Intensity Mobile Health Intervention With and Without Health Counseling for Persons With Type 2 Diabetes, Part 1: Baseline and Short-Term Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial in the Norwegian Part of RENEWING HEALTH.一项针对 2 型糖尿病患者的低强度移动健康干预措施,联合和不联合健康咨询:RENEWING HEALTH 挪威部分的一项随机对照试验的基线和短期结果。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Dec 11;2(4):e52. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3535.
10
Implementation of a multi-level community-clinical linkage intervention to improve glycemic control among south Asian patients with uncontrolled diabetes: study protocol of the DREAM initiative.实施多层次社区-临床联动干预以改善控制不佳的南亚糖尿病患者的血糖控制:DREAM 计划研究方案。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2021 Nov 23;21(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12902-021-00885-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the effectiveness of community health worker interventions on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.评估社区卫生工作者干预措施对2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 15;15(7):e096651. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096651.
2
"Veteran to Veteran, There's Automatically a Trust": A Qualitative Study of Veterans' Experiences in a Peer Health-Coaching Program for Hypertension.“老兵与老兵之间,自然而然存在信任”:一项关于老兵参与高血压同伴健康指导项目经历的定性研究
AJPM Focus. 2024 Jul 3;3(6):100257. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100257. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of and Trends in Diabetes Among Adults in the United States, 1988-2012.美国成年人糖尿病患病率及趋势(1988 年至 2012 年)。
JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):1021-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10029.
2
Telephone Intervention to Improve Diabetes Control: A Randomized Trial in the New York City A1c Registry.电话干预改善糖尿病控制:纽约市糖化血红蛋白登记处的一项随机试验
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Dec;49(6):832-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.016. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
3
Community Health Worker Interventions to Improve Glycemic Control in People with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
A Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Effects of a Social Needs Navigation Intervention on Health Outcomes and Healthcare Utilization among Medicaid Members with Type 2 Diabetes.
一项随机对照试验,旨在测试社会需求导航干预对 2 型糖尿病 Medicaid 参保患者健康结果和医疗保健利用的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jul 18;21(7):936. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21070936.
4
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Unmet Social Needs and Clinical Outcomes Among Adults with Diabetes.一项改善成年糖尿病患者未满足的社会需求及临床结局的随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Oct;39(13):2415-2424. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08708-8. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
5
Effectiveness of self-management interventions for long-term conditions in people experiencing socio-economic deprivation in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高收入国家中社会经济贫困人群的长期疾病自我管理干预措施的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Nov 29;45(4):970-1041. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad145.
6
What is the volume, diversity and nature of recent, robust evidence for the use of peer support in health and social care? An evidence and gap map.近期关于在健康和社会护理中使用同伴支持的有力证据的数量、多样性和性质是什么?一份证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 26;18(3):e1264. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1264. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
Clinician practices, knowledge, and attitudes regarding primary human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: A mixed-methods study in Indiana.临床医生关于宫颈癌筛查中人类乳头瘤病毒初筛的实践、知识及态度:印第安纳州的一项混合方法研究
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Nov 30;31:102070. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102070. eCollection 2023 Feb.
8
Bridge to Health/Puente a la Salud: a pilot randomized trial to address diabetes self-management and social needs among high-risk patients.桥梁健康计划/ Puente a la Salud:一项针对高危患者糖尿病自我管理和社会需求的试点随机试验。
Transl Behav Med. 2022 Jul 18;12(7):783-792. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac016.
9
Digital Health-Enabled Community-Centered Care: Scalable Model to Empower Future Community Health Workers Using Human-in-the-Loop Artificial Intelligence.以数字健康为支撑的社区中心护理:利用“人工参与”人工智能赋能未来社区卫生工作者的可扩展模式。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 6;6(4):e29535. doi: 10.2196/29535.
10
Using path analysis to model the process of change in HbA1c among African Americans and Latinos in a community health worker diabetes intervention.在一项社区卫生工作者糖尿病干预措施中,运用路径分析对非裔美国人和拉丁裔人群糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的变化过程进行建模。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2166-2173. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.11.025. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
社区卫生工作者干预措施改善糖尿病患者血糖控制:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jul;30(7):1004-12. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3247-0. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
4
Peer Support for Achieving Independence in Diabetes (Peer-AID): design, methods and baseline characteristics of a randomized controlled trial of community health worker assisted diabetes self-management support.同伴支持促进糖尿病患者实现独立(同伴援助):社区卫生工作者协助糖尿病自我管理支持的随机对照试验的设计、方法和基线特征
Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jul;38(2):361-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
5
Impact of peer health coaching on glycemic control in low-income patients with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.同伴健康教练对糖尿病低收入患者血糖控制的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;11(2):137-44. doi: 10.1370/afm.1443.
6
The role of community health workers in diabetes: update on current literature.社区卫生工作者在糖尿病中的作用:当前文献综述。
Curr Diab Rep. 2013 Apr;13(2):163-71. doi: 10.1007/s11892-012-0359-3.
7
Fasting time and lipid levels in a community-based population: a cross-sectional study.社区人群的禁食时间与血脂水平:一项横断面研究
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Dec 10;172(22):1707-10. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3708.
8
Factors associated with poor glycemic control or wide glycemic variability among diabetes patients in Hawaii, 2006-2009.2006-2009 年夏威夷糖尿病患者血糖控制不佳或血糖波动较大的相关因素。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:120065. doi: 10.5888/pcd9.120065.
9
Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).2型糖尿病高血糖管理:以患者为中心的方法:美国糖尿病协会(ADA)和欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)的立场声明
Diabetes Care. 2012 Jun;35(6):1364-79. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0413. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
10
The Mexican-American Trial of Community Health workers (MATCH): design and baseline characteristics of a randomized controlled trial testing a culturally tailored community diabetes self-management intervention.美墨裔社区卫生工作者试验(MATCH):一项随机对照试验的设计和基线特征,该试验测试了一种文化适应的社区糖尿病自我管理干预措施。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Mar;33(2):369-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.10.013. Epub 2011 Nov 15.