Suppr超能文献

2010 - 2014年在华盛顿州西雅图市对低收入糖尿病成年患者开展社区卫生工作者自我管理支持干预的随机对照试验

Randomized Controlled Trial of a Community Health Worker Self-Management Support Intervention Among Low-Income Adults With Diabetes, Seattle, Washington, 2010-2014.

作者信息

Nelson Karin, Taylor Leslie, Silverman Julie, Kiefer Meghan, Hebert Paul, Lessler Dan, Krieger James

机构信息

VA Health Services Research and Development, Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, Washington.

VA Puget Sound Health Care System, General Internal Medicine Service, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Feb 9;14:E15. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.160344.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Community health workers (CHWs) can improve diabetes outcomes; however, questions remain about translating research findings into practical low-intensity models for safety-net providers. We tested the effectiveness of a home-based low-intensity CHW intervention for improving health outcomes among low-income adults with diabetes.

METHODS

Low-income patients with glycated hemoglobin A (HbA) of 8.0% or higher in the 12 months before enrollment from 3 safety-net providers were randomized to a 12-month CHW-delivered diabetes self-management intervention or usual care. CHWs were based at a local health department. The primary outcome was change in HbA from baseline enrollment to 12 months; secondary outcomes included blood pressure and lipid levels, quality of life, and health care use.

RESULTS

The change in HbA in the intervention group (n = 145) (unadjusted mean of 9.09% to 8.58%, change of -0.51) compared with the control group (n = 142) (9.04% to 8.71%, change of -0.33) was not significant (P = .54). In an analysis of participants with poor glycemic control (HbA >10%), the intervention group had a 1.23-point greater decrease in HbA compared with controls (P = .046). For the entire study population, we found a decrease in reported physician visits (P < .001) and no improvement in health-related quality of life (P = .07) in the intervention group compared with the control group.

CONCLUSION

A low-intensity CHW-delivered intervention to support diabetes self-management did not significantly improve HbA relative to usual care. Among the subgroup of participants with poor glycemic control (HbA >10% at baseline), the intervention was effective.

摘要

引言

社区卫生工作者(CHW)能够改善糖尿病治疗效果;然而,对于如何将研究结果转化为安全网提供者可采用的实用低强度模式,仍存在疑问。我们测试了一项基于家庭的低强度CHW干预措施对改善低收入糖尿病成年人健康结局的有效性。

方法

来自3个安全网提供者的低收入患者,若在入组前12个月糖化血红蛋白A(HbA)≥8.0%,则被随机分为接受为期12个月的由CHW提供的糖尿病自我管理干预组或常规治疗组。CHW隶属于当地卫生部门。主要结局指标为从基线入组至12个月时HbA的变化;次要结局指标包括血压、血脂水平、生活质量和医疗保健利用情况。

结果

干预组(n = 145)HbA的变化(未调整均值从9.09%降至8.58%,变化值为 -0.51)与对照组(n = 142)(从9.04%降至8.71%,变化值为 -0.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd52/5303652/111408fd0c2f/PCD-14-E15s01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验