Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR 97227, USA.
Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA.
Transl Behav Med. 2022 Jul 18;12(7):783-792. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac016.
Social needs contribute to persistent diabetes disparities; thus, it is imperative to address social needs to optimize diabetes management. The purpose of this study was to determine determine the feasibility and acceptability of health system-based social care versus social care + behavioral intervention to address social needs and improve diabetes self-management among patients with type 2 diabetes. Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, and low-income White patients with recent hemoglobin A1C (A1C) ≥ 8%, and ≥1 social need were recruited from an integrated health system. Patients were randomized to one-of-two 6-month interventions: (a) navigation to resources (NAV) facilitated by a Patient Navigator; or (b) NAV + evidence-based nine-session diabetes self-management support (DSMS) program facilitated by a community health worker (CHW). A1C was extracted from the electronic health record. We successfully recruited 110 eligible patients (54 NAV; 56 NAV + DSMS). During the trial, 78% NAV and 80% NAV + DSMS participants successfully connected to a navigator; 84% NAV + DSMS connected to a CHW. At 6-month follow-up, 33% of NAV and 34% of NAV + DSMS participants had an A1C < 8%. Mean reduction in A1C was clinically significant in NAV (-0.65%) and NAV + DSMS (-0.72%). By follow-up, 89% of NAV and 87% of NAV + DSMS were successfully connected to resources to address at least one need. Findings suggest that it is feasible to implement a health system-based social care intervention, separately or in combination, with a behavioral intervention to improve diabetes management among a high-risk, socially complex patient population. A larger, pragmatic trial is needed to test the comparative effectiveness of each approach on diabetes-related outcomes.
社会需求导致糖尿病持续存在差异;因此,解决社会需求以优化糖尿病管理至关重要。本研究旨在确定基于卫生系统的社会关怀与社会关怀+行为干预相结合,以满足社会需求并改善 2 型糖尿病患者的自我管理的可行性和可接受性。从一个综合卫生系统中招募了近期糖化血红蛋白(A1C)≥8%且存在≥1 项社会需求的黑/非裔美国、西班牙裔/拉丁裔和低收入白人患者。患者随机分为两种 6 个月干预措施之一:(a)由患者导航员提供的导航资源(NAV);或(b)由社区卫生工作者(CHW)提供的 NAV+基于证据的九节糖尿病自我管理支持(DSMS)计划。A1C 从电子健康记录中提取。我们成功招募了 110 名符合条件的患者(NAV 组 54 名;NAV+DSMS 组 56 名)。在试验期间,78%的 NAV 和 80%的 NAV+DSMS 参与者成功与导航员联系;84%的 NAV+DSMS 与 CHW 联系。在 6 个月的随访中,33%的 NAV 和 34%的 NAV+DSMS 参与者的 A1C<8%。NAV(-0.65%)和 NAV+DSMS(-0.72%)的 A1C 平均降低具有临床意义。随访时,89%的 NAV 和 87%的 NAV+DSMS 成功联系资源以满足至少一项需求。研究结果表明,实施基于卫生系统的社会关怀干预措施,单独或联合实施行为干预措施,以改善高风险、社会复杂患者群体的糖尿病管理是可行的。需要进行更大规模的实用试验,以测试每种方法在糖尿病相关结局方面的比较效果。