• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

RevManHAL:迈向系统评价中的自动文本生成

RevManHAL: towards automatic text generation in systematic reviews.

作者信息

Torres Torres Mercedes, Adams Clive E

机构信息

Computer Vision Lab, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Cochrane Schizophrenia Group, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 9;6(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0421-y.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-017-0421-y
PMID:28183340
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5301442/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Systematic reviews are a key part of healthcare evaluation. They involve important painstaking but repetitive work. A major producer of systematic reviews, the Cochrane Collaboration, employs Review Manager (RevMan) programme-a software which assists reviewers and produces XML-structured files. This paper describes an add-on programme (RevManHAL) which helps auto-generate the abstract, results and discussion sections of RevMan-generated reviews in multiple languages. The paper also describes future developments for RevManHAL.

METHODS

RevManHAL was created in Java using NetBeans by a programmer working full time for 2 months.

RESULTS

The resulting open-source programme uses editable phrase banks to envelop text/numbers from within the prepared RevMan file in formatted readable text of a chosen language. In this way, considerable parts of the review's 'abstract', 'results' and 'discussion' sections are created and a phrase added to 'acknowledgements'.

CONCLUSION

RevManHAL's output needs to be checked by reviewers, but already, from our experience within the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group (200 maintained reviews, 900 reviewers), RevManHAL has saved much time which is better employed thinking about the meaning of the data rather than restating them. Many more functions will become possible as review writing becomes increasingly automated.

摘要

背景

系统评价是医疗保健评估的关键部分。它们涉及重要但繁琐且重复的工作。系统评价的主要产出者Cochrane协作网使用Review Manager(RevMan)程序——一种协助评价者并生成XML结构文件的软件。本文描述了一个附加程序(RevManHAL),它有助于自动生成RevMan生成的多种语言评价的摘要、结果和讨论部分。本文还描述了RevManHAL的未来发展。

方法

RevManHAL由一名全职工作两个月的程序员使用NetBeans在Java中创建。

结果

生成的开源程序使用可编辑的短语库,将准备好的RevMan文件中的文本/数字包装成所选语言的格式化可读文本。通过这种方式,创建了评价的“摘要”、“结果”和“讨论”部分的相当一部分,并在“致谢”中添加了一个短语。

结论

RevManHAL的输出需要由评价者进行检查,但根据我们在Cochrane精神分裂症小组的经验(200篇持续评价,900名评价者),RevManHAL已经节省了大量时间,这些时间更好地用于思考数据的意义而不是重述数据。随着评价撰写越来越自动化,更多功能将成为可能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53d3/5301442/154b3fc99fa0/13643_2017_421_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53d3/5301442/01ed2f422d30/13643_2017_421_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53d3/5301442/154b3fc99fa0/13643_2017_421_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53d3/5301442/01ed2f422d30/13643_2017_421_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53d3/5301442/154b3fc99fa0/13643_2017_421_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
RevManHAL: towards automatic text generation in systematic reviews.RevManHAL:迈向系统评价中的自动文本生成
Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 9;6(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0421-y.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Introducing RAPTOR: RevMan Parsing Tool for Reviewers.介绍 RAPTOR:用于评审员的 RevMan 解析工具。
Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 26;8(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1070-0.
4
Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?系统评价中检索研究的方法学发展:过去、现在与未来?
Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 25;2:78. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-78.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Natural language processing was effective in assisting rapid title and abstract screening when updating systematic reviews.自然语言处理在更新系统评价时,有助于快速进行标题和摘要筛选。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 May;133:121-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.010. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
7
Doublet method for very fast autocoding.用于超快速自动编码的双重方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2004 Sep 15;4:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-4-16.
8
Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation.支持医疗保健系统评价标题和摘要筛选的软件工具:评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jan 13;20(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-0897-3.
9
Automatic reconstruction of a bacterial regulatory network using Natural Language Processing.使用自然语言处理自动重建细菌调控网络。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Aug 7;8:293. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-293.
10
Resources for comparing the speed and performance of medical autocoders.用于比较医学自动编码软件速度和性能的资源。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2004 Jun 15;4:8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-4-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence synthesis, digital scribes, and translational challenges for artificial intelligence in healthcare.医疗保健中人工智能的证据综合、数字记录员和转化挑战。
Cell Rep Med. 2022 Dec 20;3(12):100860. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100860. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
2
Claims of 'no difference' or 'no effect' in Cochrane and other systematic reviews.Cochrane 和其他系统评价中的“无差异”或“无效果”声称。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2021 Jun;26(3):118-120. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111257. Epub 2020 Jan 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Tweeting links to Cochrane Schizophrenia Group reviews: a randomised controlled trial.在推特上发布Cochrane精神分裂症小组综述的链接:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 8;6(3):e010509. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010509.
2
Wikipedia--challenges and new horizons in enhancing medical education.维基百科——医学教育提升中的挑战与新视野。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Mar 6;15:32. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0309-2.
3
Systematic review automation technologies.系统评价自动化技术。
Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 9;3:74. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-74.
4
The Cochrane collaboration at 20.Cochrane协作网成立20周年。
BMJ. 2013 Dec 18;347:f7383. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f7383.
5
Survey of the reporting characteristics of systematic reviews in rehabilitation.康复领域系统评价报告特征的调查。
Phys Ther. 2013 Nov;93(11):1456-66. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120382. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
6
Are systematic reviews up-to-date at the time of publication?发表时系统评价是否为最新?
Syst Rev. 2013 May 28;2:36. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-36.
7
Research questions and priorities for tuberculosis: a survey of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses.结核病研究问题和优先事项:对已发表系统评价和荟萃分析的调查。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e42479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042479. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
8
Survey of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in ophthalmology.眼科系统评价和荟萃分析研究综述。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jun;96(6):896-9. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-301589. Epub 2012 Mar 24.
9
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.GRADE 指南:1. 简介-GRADE 证据概况和发现摘要表。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
10
The Cochrane collaboration: preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care.考克兰协作网:编制、维护并传播关于卫生保健效果的系统评价。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Dec 31;703:156-63; discussion 163-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26345.x.