• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统评价自动化技术。

Systematic review automation technologies.

作者信息

Tsafnat Guy, Glasziou Paul, Choong Miew Keen, Dunn Adam, Galgani Filippo, Coiera Enrico

机构信息

Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 9;3:74. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-74.

DOI:10.1186/2046-4053-3-74
PMID:25005128
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4100748/
Abstract

Systematic reviews, a cornerstone of evidence-based medicine, are not produced quickly enough to support clinical practice. The cost of production, availability of the requisite expertise and timeliness are often quoted as major contributors for the delay. This detailed survey of the state of the art of information systems designed to support or automate individual tasks in the systematic review, and in particular systematic reviews of randomized controlled clinical trials, reveals trends that see the convergence of several parallel research projects.We surveyed literature describing informatics systems that support or automate the processes of systematic review or each of the tasks of the systematic review. Several projects focus on automating, simplifying and/or streamlining specific tasks of the systematic review. Some tasks are already fully automated while others are still largely manual. In this review, we describe each task and the effect that its automation would have on the entire systematic review process, summarize the existing information system support for each task, and highlight where further research is needed for realizing automation for the task. Integration of the systems that automate systematic review tasks may lead to a revised systematic review workflow. We envisage the optimized workflow will lead to system in which each systematic review is described as a computer program that automatically retrieves relevant trials, appraises them, extracts and synthesizes data, evaluates the risk of bias, performs meta-analysis calculations, and produces a report in real time.

摘要

系统评价作为循证医学的基石,其产出速度不足以支持临床实践。制作成本、所需专业知识的可得性和及时性常被认为是造成延迟的主要因素。本次针对旨在支持或自动化系统评价中各项任务(尤其是随机对照临床试验的系统评价)的信息系统现状的详细调查,揭示了多个并行研究项目趋于融合的趋势。我们对描述支持或自动化系统评价过程或系统评价各项任务的信息学系统的文献进行了调查。多个项目致力于自动化、简化和/或精简系统评价的特定任务。有些任务已完全自动化,而其他任务仍主要依靠人工操作。在本综述中,我们描述了每项任务及其自动化对整个系统评价过程的影响,总结了现有信息系统对每项任务的支持,并强调了实现任务自动化还需要进一步研究的方向。自动化系统评价任务的系统整合可能会带来经过修订的系统评价工作流程。我们设想,优化后的工作流程将催生这样一种系统,即每个系统评价都被描述为一个计算机程序,它能自动检索相关试验、评估试验、提取和综合数据、评估偏倚风险、进行荟萃分析计算并实时生成报告。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eff/4100748/9b868b118f5f/2046-4053-3-74-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eff/4100748/c1d790c89624/2046-4053-3-74-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eff/4100748/9b868b118f5f/2046-4053-3-74-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eff/4100748/c1d790c89624/2046-4053-3-74-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eff/4100748/9b868b118f5f/2046-4053-3-74-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic review automation technologies.系统评价自动化技术。
Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 9;3:74. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-74.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review.系统评价中数据提取的自动化:一项系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 15;4:78. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0066-7.
5
(Semi)automated approaches to data extraction for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in social sciences: A living review.(半)自动化方法在社会科学系统评价和荟萃分析中的数据提取:一项正在进行的综述。
F1000Res. 2024 Sep 26;13:664. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.151493.1. eCollection 2024.
6
An Automated Literature Review Tool (LiteRev) for Streamlining and Accelerating Research Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning: Descriptive Performance Evaluation Study.一种使用自然语言处理和机器学习简化和加速研究的自动化文献综述工具(LiteRev):描述性性能评估研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 15;25:e39736. doi: 10.2196/39736.
7
How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously?如何更高效地进行系统评价?
Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 12;4:160. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0147-7.
8
[Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in laboratory medicine: principles and methods].[检验医学中的系统评价与Meta分析:原理与方法]
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2004 Nov-Dec;62(6):611-27.
9
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.基于证据的医学、系统评价以及介入性疼痛管理指南:第6部分。观察性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50.
10
Automated gene data integration with Databio.通过Databio实现基因数据的自动化整合。
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Apr 1;13(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05038-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence and Automation in Evidence Synthesis: An Investigation of Methods Employed in Cochrane, Campbell Collaboration, and Environmental Evidence Reviews.循证综合中的人工智能与自动化:对Cochrane、坎贝尔协作组织及环境证据综述所采用方法的调查
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2025 Aug 28;3(5):e70046. doi: 10.1002/cesm.70046. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Accuracy of artificial intelligence in meta-analysis: A comparative study of ChatGPT 4.0 and traditional methods in data synthesis.人工智能在Meta分析中的准确性:ChatGPT 4.0与传统数据合成方法的比较研究
World J Methodol. 2025 Dec 20;15(4):102290. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i4.102290.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas.证据与差距图:促进循证政策和战略研究议程的工具。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;79:120-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
2
Applications of text mining within systematic reviews.文本挖掘在系统评价中的应用。
Res Synth Methods. 2011 Mar;2(1):1-14. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.27. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
3
Design and implementation of Metta, a metasearch engine for biomedical literature retrieval intended for systematic reviewers.
ReviewGenie: a novel automated system for systematic reviews-an exploratory study in speech and language disorders.
ReviewGenie:一种用于系统评价的新型自动化系统——言语和语言障碍的探索性研究
Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 18;14(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02895-z.
4
Artificial intelligence across the cancer care continuum.贯穿癌症护理全过程的人工智能
Cancer. 2025 Aug 15;131(16):e70050. doi: 10.1002/cncr.70050.
5
Automating updates for scoping reviews on the environmental drivers of human and animal diseases: a comparative analysis of AI methods.自动更新关于人类和动物疾病环境驱动因素的综述:人工智能方法的比较分析
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Jun 10;8:1526820. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1526820. eCollection 2025.
6
Machine learning for accelerating screening in evidence reviews.用于加速循证综述筛查的机器学习。
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2023 Jul 20;1(5):e12021. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12021. eCollection 2023 Jul.
7
High-precision information retrieval for rapid clinical guideline updates.用于快速更新临床指南的高精度信息检索。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Apr 27;8(1):227. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01648-5.
8
Open challenges for the automatic synthesis of clinical trials.临床试验自动合成面临的开放性挑战。
BMC Res Notes. 2025 Feb 2;18(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07121-6.
9
AI-pocalypse now: Automating the systematic literature review with SPARK (Systematic processing and automated review Kit) - gathering, organising, filtering, and scaffolding.当下的人工智能大灾难:使用SPARK(系统处理与自动综述工具包)实现系统文献综述的自动化——收集、整理、筛选及搭建框架。
MethodsX. 2024 Dec 21;14:103129. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.103129. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
Accelerating Evidence Synthesis in Observational Studies: Development of a Living Natural Language Processing-Assisted Intelligent Systematic Literature Review System.加速观察性研究中的证据综合:开发一个基于自然语言处理的智能化实时文献综述系统。
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Oct 23;12:e54653. doi: 10.2196/54653.
元搜索引擎 Metta 的设计与实现,旨在为系统评价者检索生物医学文献。
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2014 Jan 10;2:1. doi: 10.1186/2047-2501-2-1. eCollection 2014.
4
Incorrect inclusion of individual studies and methodological flaws in systematic review and meta-analysis.系统评价和荟萃分析中对个别研究的错误纳入及方法学缺陷。
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 May;64(622):221-2. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X679615.
5
Citation networks of related trials are often disconnected: implications for bidirectional citation searches.相关试验的引文网络往往是不连通的:对双向引文检索的影响。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jul;67(7):793-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.015. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
6
Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap.实时系统评价:缩小证据-实践差距的新契机。
PLoS Med. 2014 Feb 18;11(2):e1001603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001603. eCollection 2014 Feb.
7
Rule-based deduplication of article records from bibliographic databases.基于规则对书目数据库中的文章记录进行重复数据删除。
Database (Oxford). 2014 Jan 16;2014:bat086. doi: 10.1093/database/bat086. Print 2014.
8
A multicomponent decision tool for prioritising the updating of systematic reviews.一种用于确定系统评价更新优先级的多成分决策工具。
BMJ. 2013 Dec 13;347:f7191. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f7191.
9
Systematic reviews: work that needs to be done and not to be done.系统评价:需要做和不需要做的工作。
J Evid Based Med. 2013 Nov;6(4):232-5. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12072.
10
The Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe): an informatics foundation for the science of clinical research.临床研究本体论(OCRe):临床研究科学的信息学基础。
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Dec;52:78-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Nov 13.