Suppr超能文献

附着方式会影响基于加速度计的犬类活动数据。

The method of attachment influences accelerometer-based activity data in dogs.

作者信息

Martin Kyle W, Olsen Anastasia M, Duncan Colleen G, Duerr Felix M

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, James L. Voss Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Colorado State University, 300 W Drake Road, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.

Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine, 625 Harrison Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.

出版信息

BMC Vet Res. 2017 Feb 10;13(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-0971-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accelerometer-based activity monitoring is a promising new tool in veterinary medicine used to objectively assess activity levels in dogs. To date, it is unknown how device orientation, attachment method, and attachment of a leash to the collar holding an accelerometer affect canine activity data. It was our goal to evaluate whether attachment methods of accelerometers affect activity counts. Eight healthy, client-owned dogs were fitted with two identical neck collars to which two identical activity monitors were attached using six different methods of attachment. These methods of attachment evaluated the use of a protective case, positioning of the activity monitor and the tightness of attachment of the accelerometer. Lastly, the effect of leash attachment to the collar was evaluated. For trials where the effect of leash attachment to the collar was not being studied, the leash was attached to a harness. Activity data obtained from separate monitors within a given experiment were compared using Pearson correlation coefficients and across all experiments using the Kruskal-Wallis Test.

RESULTS

There was excellent correlation and low variability between activity monitors on separate collars when the leash was attached to a harness, regardless of their relative positions. There was good correlation when activity monitors were placed on the same collar regardless of orientation. There were poor correlations between activity monitors in three experiments: when the leash was fastened to the collar that held an activity monitor, when one activity monitor was housed in the protective casing, and when one activity monitor was loosely zip-tied to the collar rather than threaded on using the provided metal loop. Follow-up, pair-wise comparisons identified the correlation associated with these three methods of attachment to be statistically different from the level of correlation when monitors were placed on separate collars.

CONCLUSIONS

While accelerometer-based activity monitors are useful tools to objectively assess physical activity in dogs, care must be taken when choosing a method to attach the device. The attachment of the activity monitor to the collar should utilize a second, dedicated collar that is not used for leash attachment and the attachment method should remain consistent throughout a study period.

摘要

背景

基于加速度计的活动监测是兽医学中一种很有前景的新工具,用于客观评估犬类的活动水平。迄今为止,尚不清楚设备的方向、附着方法以及将皮带系在装有加速度计的项圈上如何影响犬类活动数据。我们的目标是评估加速度计的附着方法是否会影响活动计数。八只健康的、客户拥有的犬只佩戴了两个相同的项圈,使用六种不同的附着方法将两个相同的活动监测器附着在项圈上。这些附着方法评估了保护壳的使用、活动监测器的位置以及加速度计的附着紧密度。最后,评估了将皮带系在项圈上的影响。对于不研究将皮带系在项圈上的影响的试验,将皮带系在背带上。使用Pearson相关系数比较给定实验中从单独监测器获得的活动数据,并使用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较所有实验中的数据。

结果

当皮带系在背带上时,无论其相对位置如何,单独项圈上的活动监测器之间都具有极好的相关性和低变异性。当活动监测器放置在同一项圈上时,无论方向如何,都具有良好的相关性。在三个实验中,活动监测器之间的相关性较差:当皮带系在装有活动监测器的项圈上时、当一个活动监测器装在保护壳中时、以及当一个活动监测器通过松散的拉链系在项圈上而不是使用提供的金属环穿在项圈上时。后续的成对比较确定,与这三种附着方法相关的相关性在统计学上与将监测器放置在单独项圈上时的相关性水平不同。

结论

虽然基于加速度计的活动监测器是客观评估犬类身体活动的有用工具,但在选择附着设备的方法时必须谨慎。活动监测器与项圈的附着应使用第二个专用项圈,且该项圈不用于系皮带,并且附着方法在整个研究期间应保持一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b55/5303220/b252dbde6716/12917_2017_971_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验