Suppr超能文献

用于测量泌乳奶牛反刍、采食活动和空闲时间的行为监测项圈的验证及不同设备间的可靠性

Validation and interdevice reliability of a behavior monitoring collar to measure rumination, feeding activity, and idle time of lactating dairy cows.

作者信息

Lovatti J V R, Dijkinga K A, Aires J F, Garrido L F C, Costa J H C, Daros R R

机构信息

Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405.

Graduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, 80215-901, Brazil.

出版信息

JDS Commun. 2024 Mar 29;5(6):602-607. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2023-0467. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Interdevice precision and accuracy are not investigated for precision livestock farming (PLF) technologies, but are fundamental for the use of data in populational metrics and to compare cows' data. This study aimed to validate a behavior monitoring collar (BMC; CowMed, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil) and its interdevice reliability. First, we compared observations with the BMC, and second the interdevice precision and accuracy for rumination, feeding activity, and idle time of lactating dairy cows. Holstein cows (n = 23) were housed in a voluntary milk system freestall barn and fitted with 2 devices within the same cow. Observations were made over 2 periods of one day (0700 to 1100 h, 1400 to 1700 h); the 7 h per cow were summarized for each behavior to assess the agreement of observed behavior and BMC data. To assess the interdevice reliability, 26 d of BMC data were summarized by day per cow for both devices. Pearson correlation (r), coefficient of determination (R), Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (ρ), linear regression, and Bland-Altman plots (BAP) were calculated for each period of observation. For the validation, we found high correlations for feeding activity, very high for idle time, but low correlations for rumination. The BAP were deemed acceptable and without bias; BAP mean differences ± SD were 0.83 ± 4.01, -0.48 ± 4.15, and 7.17 ± 3.94 min/h for rumination, feeding activity, and idle time, respectively. The slope of the linear regression did not differ from 1 for any behaviors but idle. For interdevice comparison, we found moderate correlations for feeding activity and idle time, and a low correlation for rumination. The BAP was deemed acceptable and without bias; BAP mean differences were -0.36 ± 2.84, 0.45 ± 3.51, and -0.06 ± 2.81 min/h for rumination, feeding activity, and idle time, respectively. All slopes of the linear regressions differed from 1 except feeding time. Thus, the interdevice comparison did not meet the accuracy criteria. In summary, this study validated the precision of the BMC for recording feeding activity of lactating dairy cows.

摘要

精准畜牧养殖(PLF)技术尚未对设备间的精密度和准确性进行研究,但这对于在群体指标中使用数据以及比较奶牛数据至关重要。本研究旨在验证一种行为监测项圈(BMC;CowMed,巴西圣玛丽亚州)及其设备间的可靠性。首先,我们将观察结果与BMC进行比较,其次是比较设备间对于泌乳奶牛反刍、采食活动和空闲时间的精密度和准确性。23头荷斯坦奶牛被安置在一个自愿挤奶系统的自由栏舍中,并在同一头牛身上安装了2个设备。在两个为期一天的时间段(07:00至11:00时,14:00至17:00时)进行观察;对每头牛的7小时内的每种行为进行汇总,以评估观察到的行为与BMC数据的一致性。为了评估设备间的可靠性,对每头牛的两个设备的26天BMC数据按天进行汇总。对每个观察时间段计算皮尔逊相关系数(r)、决定系数(R)、林氏一致性相关系数(ρ)、线性回归和布兰德 - 奥特曼图(BAP)。在验证过程中,我们发现采食活动的相关性较高,空闲时间的相关性非常高,但反刍的相关性较低。BAP被认为是可接受的且无偏差;反刍、采食活动和空闲时间的BAP平均差异±标准差分别为0.83±4.01、-0.48±4.15和7.17±3.94分钟/小时。除空闲时间外,任何行为的线性回归斜率均与1无差异。对于设备间比较,我们发现采食活动和空闲时间的相关性中等,反刍的相关性较低。BAP被认为是可接受的且无偏差;反刍、采食活动和空闲时间的BAP平均差异分别为-0.36±2.84、0.45±3.51和-0.06±2.81分钟/小时。除采食时间外,所有线性回归的斜率均与1不同。因此,设备间比较未达到准确性标准。总之,本研究验证了BMC记录泌乳奶牛采食活动的精密度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92fe/11624420/0f745d19afa6/fx1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验