• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新的脓毒症和脓毒性休克定义共识:对治疗策略和药物研发的影响?

New Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock: Implications for Treatment Strategies and Drug Development?

机构信息

Imperial School of Anaesthesia, London, UK.

Adult ICU, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Drugs. 2017 Mar;77(4):353-361. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0698-0.

DOI:10.1007/s40265-017-0698-0
PMID:28188516
Abstract

Sepsis continues to escape a precise diagnostic definition. The most recent consensus definition, termed Sepsis-3, highlights the importance of the maladaptive and potentially life-threatening host response to infection. After briefly reviewing the history and epidemiology of sepsis, we go on to describe some of the challenges encountered when classifying such a heterogenous disease state. In the context of these new definitions for sepsis and septic shock, we explore current and potentially novel therapies, and conclude by mentioning some of the controversies of this most recent framework.

摘要

脓毒症仍然没有一个明确的诊断定义。最近的共识定义,即 Sepsis-3,强调了宿主对感染的适应性和潜在威胁生命的反应的重要性。在简要回顾脓毒症的历史和流行病学后,我们接着描述了在对这种异质性疾病进行分类时遇到的一些挑战。在这些脓毒症和感染性休克的新定义的背景下,我们探讨了当前和潜在的新疗法,并在最后提到了这个最新框架的一些争议。

相似文献

1
New Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock: Implications for Treatment Strategies and Drug Development?新的脓毒症和脓毒性休克定义共识:对治疗策略和药物研发的影响?
Drugs. 2017 Mar;77(4):353-361. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0698-0.
2
Comparison of International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference Versus Sepsis-3 Definitions for Children Presenting With Septic Shock to a Tertiary Care Center in India: A Retrospective Study.国际儿科脓毒症共识会议与脓毒症-3 定义在印度一家三级护理中心用于诊断感染性休克患儿的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;20(3):e122-e129. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001864.
3
An Emergency Department Validation of the SEP-3 Sepsis and Septic Shock Definitions and Comparison With 1992 Consensus Definitions.急诊科对SEP-3脓毒症和脓毒性休克定义的验证及与1992年共识定义的比较
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;70(4):544-552.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
4
Potential Impact of the 2016 Consensus Definitions of Sepsis and Septic Shock on Future Sepsis Research.2016年脓毒症及脓毒性休克共识定义对未来脓毒症研究的潜在影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;70(4):553-561.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.04.007.
5
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
6
[New Sepsis-3 definition : Do we have to treat sepsis before we can diagnose it from now on?].[新的脓毒症-3定义:从现在起,我们必须在诊断脓毒症之前就进行治疗吗?]
Anaesthesist. 2017 Aug;66(8):614-621. doi: 10.1007/s00101-017-0316-2.
7
Sepsis and septic shock: New definitions, new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.脓毒症和脓毒性休克:新定义、新诊断和新治疗方法。
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2017 Sep;10:204-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jul 22.
8
A new definition of sepsis (Sepsis-3) - aims, advantages, and controversies.脓毒症的新定义(脓毒症-3)——目标、优势及争议
Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2018 Spring;67(1):36-43.
9
Epidemiology of sepsis and septic shock.脓毒症和脓毒性休克的流行病学。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2021 Apr 1;34(2):71-76. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000958.
10
International Consensus Criteria for Pediatric Sepsis and Septic Shock.国际儿童脓毒症和脓毒性休克共识标准。
JAMA. 2024 Feb 27;331(8):665-674. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.0179.

引用本文的文献

1
Screening and Application of DNA Aptamers for Heparin-Binding Protein.肝素结合蛋白的DNA适配体筛选及应用
Molecules. 2024 Apr 10;29(8):1717. doi: 10.3390/molecules29081717.
2
Impact of different consensus definition criteria on sepsis diagnosis in a cohort of critically ill patients-Insights from a new mathematical probabilistic approach to mortality-based validation of sepsis criteria.不同共识定义标准对危重症患者脓毒症诊断的影响——基于新的数学概率方法对基于死亡率的脓毒症标准进行验证的见解。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 8;15(9):e0238548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238548. eCollection 2020.
3
Sepsis criteria versus clinical diagnosis of sepsis in burn patients: A validation of current sepsis scores.

本文引用的文献

1
Rationale and Design of an Adaptive Phase 2b/3 Clinical Trial of Selepressin for Adults in Septic Shock. Selepressin Evaluation Programme for Sepsis-induced Shock-Adaptive Clinical Trial.用于脓毒性休克成人的 Selepressin 适应性 2b/3 期临床试验的原理和设计。Selepressin 评价计划用于脓毒症诱导性休克适应性临床试验。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Feb;15(2):250-257. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201708-669SD.
2
Effect of Early Vasopressin vs Norepinephrine on Kidney Failure in Patients With Septic Shock: The VANISH Randomized Clinical Trial.血管加压素与去甲肾上腺素对感染性休克患者肾衰竭影响的随机临床试验:VANISH 研究。
JAMA. 2016 Aug 2;316(5):509-18. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.10485.
3
烧伤患者脓毒症标准与临床诊断的比较:现行脓毒症评分的验证。
Surgery. 2018 Dec;164(6):1241-1245. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.053. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
qSOFA does not replace SIRS in the definition of sepsis.
在脓毒症的定义中,快速序贯器官功能衰竭评分(qSOFA)并不能取代全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)。
Crit Care. 2016 Jul 17;20(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1389-z.
4
Designing phase 3 sepsis trials: application of learned experiences from critical care trials in acute heart failure.设计 3 期脓毒症试验:从急性心力衰竭的重症监护试验中吸取的经验教训的应用。
J Intensive Care. 2016 Mar 31;4:24. doi: 10.1186/s40560-016-0151-6. eCollection 2016.
5
Long-Term Quality of Life Among Survivors of Severe Sepsis: Analyses of Two International Trials.严重脓毒症幸存者的长期生活质量:两项国际试验的分析
Crit Care Med. 2016 Aug;44(8):1461-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001658.
6
New Sepsis Criteria: A Change We Should Not Make.新的脓毒症标准:一项我们不应做出的改变。
Chest. 2016 May;149(5):1117-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.02.653. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
7
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
8
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估:针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
9
A Framework for the Development and Interpretation of Different Sepsis Definitions and Clinical Criteria.不同脓毒症定义及临床标准的制定与解读框架
Crit Care Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):e113-21. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001730.
10
Vasopressors for hypotensive shock.用于低血压性休克的血管加压药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 15;2(2):CD003709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003709.pub4.