Suppr超能文献

国际儿科脓毒症共识会议与脓毒症-3 定义在印度一家三级护理中心用于诊断感染性休克患儿的比较:一项回顾性研究。

Comparison of International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference Versus Sepsis-3 Definitions for Children Presenting With Septic Shock to a Tertiary Care Center in India: A Retrospective Study.

机构信息

All authors: Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;20(3):e122-e129. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001864.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the proportion of children fulfilling "Sepsis-3" definition and International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference definition among children diagnosed to have septic shock and compare the mortality risk between the two groups.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

PICU of a tertiary care teaching hospital from 2014 to 2017.

PATIENTS

Children (≤ 17 yr old) with a diagnosis of septic shock at admission or during PICU stay.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We applied both International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference and the new "Sepsis-3" definition (sepsis with hypotension requiring vasopressors and a lactate value of ≥ 2 mmol/L) to identify cases of septic shock by these definitions. Key outcomes such as mortality, proportion attaining shock reversal at 24 hours and organ dysfunction were compared between those fulfilling "Sepsis-3" definitions ("Sepsis-3" group) and those fulfilling "International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference" definition ("International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference" group). A total of 216 patients fulfilled International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference definitions of septic shock. Of these, only 104 (48%; 95% CI, 42-55) fulfilled "Sepsis-3" definition. Children fulfilling "Sepsis-3 plus International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference definitions" ("Sepsis-3 and International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference" group) had lower proportion with shock resolution (61% vs 82%; relative risk, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62-0.88) and higher risk of multiple organ dysfunction (85% vs 68%; 1.24; 1.07-1.45) at 24 hours. The mortality was 48.5% in "Sepsis-3 and International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference" group as compared with 37.5% in the "International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference only" group (relative risk, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.94-1.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Less than half of children with septic shock identified by International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference definitions were observed to fulfill the criteria for shock as per "Sepsis-3" definitions. Lack of difference in the risk of mortality between children who fulfilled "Sepsis-3" definition and those who did not fulfill the definition raises questions on the appropriateness of using this definition for diagnosis of septic shock in children.

摘要

目的

评估符合儿童脓毒症 3 定义和国际儿科脓毒症共识会议定义的儿童比例,并比较两组的死亡率风险。

设计

回顾性图表审查。

地点

2014 年至 2017 年期间,三级教学医院的 PICU。

患者

入院时或 PICU 住院期间诊断为脓毒性休克的儿童(≤17 岁)。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

我们应用了国际儿科脓毒症共识会议和新的“脓毒症 3 定义(伴有低血压需要升压药和乳酸值≥2mmol/L 的败血症)”来确定符合这些定义的脓毒性休克病例。比较符合“脓毒症 3 定义”(“脓毒症 3 组”)和符合“国际儿科脓毒症共识会议”定义(“国际儿科脓毒症共识会议”组)的死亡率、24 小时休克逆转比例和器官功能障碍等关键结局。共有 216 例患者符合国际儿科脓毒症共识会议的脓毒性休克定义。其中,只有 104 例(48%;95%CI,42-55)符合“脓毒症 3”定义。符合“脓毒症 3 加国际儿科脓毒症共识会议定义”(“脓毒症 3 和国际儿科脓毒症共识会议”组)的儿童休克缓解比例较低(61%对 82%;相对风险,0.73;95%CI,0.62-0.88),24 小时多器官功能障碍风险较高(85%对 68%;1.24;1.07-1.45)。“脓毒症 3 和国际儿科脓毒症共识会议”组的死亡率为 48.5%,而“仅符合国际儿科脓毒症共识会议”组的死亡率为 37.5%(相对风险,1.3;95%CI,0.94-1.75)。

结论

根据“脓毒症 3”定义,通过国际儿科脓毒症共识会议定义确定的脓毒性休克患儿中,不到一半符合休克标准。符合“脓毒症 3”定义与不符合定义的患儿死亡率风险无差异,这引发了对该定义用于儿童脓毒性休克诊断的适宜性的质疑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验