All authors: Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;20(3):e122-e129. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001864.
To evaluate the proportion of children fulfilling "Sepsis-3" definition and International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference definition among children diagnosed to have septic shock and compare the mortality risk between the two groups.
Retrospective chart review.
PICU of a tertiary care teaching hospital from 2014 to 2017.
Children (≤ 17 yr old) with a diagnosis of septic shock at admission or during PICU stay.
None.
We applied both International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference and the new "Sepsis-3" definition (sepsis with hypotension requiring vasopressors and a lactate value of ≥ 2 mmol/L) to identify cases of septic shock by these definitions. Key outcomes such as mortality, proportion attaining shock reversal at 24 hours and organ dysfunction were compared between those fulfilling "Sepsis-3" definitions ("Sepsis-3" group) and those fulfilling "International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference" definition ("International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference" group). A total of 216 patients fulfilled International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference definitions of septic shock. Of these, only 104 (48%; 95% CI, 42-55) fulfilled "Sepsis-3" definition. Children fulfilling "Sepsis-3 plus International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference definitions" ("Sepsis-3 and International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference" group) had lower proportion with shock resolution (61% vs 82%; relative risk, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62-0.88) and higher risk of multiple organ dysfunction (85% vs 68%; 1.24; 1.07-1.45) at 24 hours. The mortality was 48.5% in "Sepsis-3 and International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference" group as compared with 37.5% in the "International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference only" group (relative risk, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.94-1.75).
Less than half of children with septic shock identified by International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference definitions were observed to fulfill the criteria for shock as per "Sepsis-3" definitions. Lack of difference in the risk of mortality between children who fulfilled "Sepsis-3" definition and those who did not fulfill the definition raises questions on the appropriateness of using this definition for diagnosis of septic shock in children.
评估符合儿童脓毒症 3 定义和国际儿科脓毒症共识会议定义的儿童比例,并比较两组的死亡率风险。
回顾性图表审查。
2014 年至 2017 年期间,三级教学医院的 PICU。
入院时或 PICU 住院期间诊断为脓毒性休克的儿童(≤17 岁)。
无。
我们应用了国际儿科脓毒症共识会议和新的“脓毒症 3 定义(伴有低血压需要升压药和乳酸值≥2mmol/L 的败血症)”来确定符合这些定义的脓毒性休克病例。比较符合“脓毒症 3 定义”(“脓毒症 3 组”)和符合“国际儿科脓毒症共识会议”定义(“国际儿科脓毒症共识会议”组)的死亡率、24 小时休克逆转比例和器官功能障碍等关键结局。共有 216 例患者符合国际儿科脓毒症共识会议的脓毒性休克定义。其中,只有 104 例(48%;95%CI,42-55)符合“脓毒症 3”定义。符合“脓毒症 3 加国际儿科脓毒症共识会议定义”(“脓毒症 3 和国际儿科脓毒症共识会议”组)的儿童休克缓解比例较低(61%对 82%;相对风险,0.73;95%CI,0.62-0.88),24 小时多器官功能障碍风险较高(85%对 68%;1.24;1.07-1.45)。“脓毒症 3 和国际儿科脓毒症共识会议”组的死亡率为 48.5%,而“仅符合国际儿科脓毒症共识会议”组的死亡率为 37.5%(相对风险,1.3;95%CI,0.94-1.75)。
根据“脓毒症 3”定义,通过国际儿科脓毒症共识会议定义确定的脓毒性休克患儿中,不到一半符合休克标准。符合“脓毒症 3”定义与不符合定义的患儿死亡率风险无差异,这引发了对该定义用于儿童脓毒性休克诊断的适宜性的质疑。