Heussner Kirsten, Rauh Manfred, Cordasic Nada, Menendez-Castro Carlos, Huebner Hanna, Ruebner Matthias, Schmidt Marius, Hartner Andrea, Rascher Wolfgang, Fahlbusch Fabian B
Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Steroids. 2017 Apr;120:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) allows for the direct analysis of multiple hormones in a single probe with minimal sample volume. Rodent-based animal studies strongly rely on microsampling, such as the dry blood spot (DBS) method. However, DBS suffers the drawback of hematocrit-dependence (non-volumetric). Hence, novel volumetric microsampling techniques were introduced recently, allowing sampling of fixed accurate volumes. We compared these methods for steroid analysis in the rat to improve inter-system comparability.
We analyzed steroid levels in blood using the absorptive microsampling devices Whatman® 903 Protein Saver Cards, Noviplex™ Plasma Prep Cards and the Mitra™ Microsampling device and compared the obtained results to the respective EDTA plasma levels. Quantitative steroid analysis was performed via LC-MS/MS. For the determination of the plasma volume factor for each steroid, their levels in pooled blood samples from each human adults and rats (18weeks) were compared and the transferability of these factors was evaluated in a new set of juvenile (21days) and adult (18weeks) rats. Hematocrit was determined concomitantly.
Using these approaches, we were unable to apply one single volume factor for each steroid. Instead, plasma volume factors had to be adjusted for the recovery rate of each steroid and device individually. The tested microsampling systems did not allow the use of one single volume factor for adult and juvenile rats based on an unexpectedly strong hematocrit-dependency and other steroid specific (pre-analytic) factors.
Our study provides correction factors for LC-MS/MS steroid analysis of volumetric and non-volumetric microsampling systems in comparison to plasma. It argues for thorough analysis of chromatographic effects before the use of novel volumetric systems for steroid analysis.
液相色谱串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)能够在单个样本中以最少的样本量直接分析多种激素。基于啮齿动物的动物研究强烈依赖微量采样,如干血斑(DBS)法。然而,DBS存在依赖血细胞比容(非体积)的缺点。因此,最近引入了新型体积微量采样技术,允许采集固定准确体积的样本。我们比较了这些方法在大鼠体内进行类固醇分析的效果,以提高系统间的可比性。
我们使用吸收性微量采样装置Whatman® 903蛋白保存卡、Noviplex™血浆制备卡和Mitra™微量采样装置分析血液中的类固醇水平,并将所得结果与各自的乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)血浆水平进行比较。通过LC-MS/MS进行类固醇定量分析。为了确定每种类固醇的血浆体积因子,比较了来自每个成年人和大鼠(18周)的混合血样中它们的水平,并在一组新的幼年(21天)和成年(18周)大鼠中评估了这些因子的可转移性。同时测定血细胞比容。
使用这些方法,我们无法为每种类固醇应用单一的体积因子。相反,血浆体积因子必须根据每种类固醇和装置的回收率单独调整。由于出乎意料的强烈的血细胞比容依赖性和其他类固醇特异性(分析前)因素,所测试的微量采样系统不允许基于成年和幼年大鼠使用单一的体积因子。
我们的研究提供了与血浆相比,体积和非体积微量采样系统用于LC-MS/MS类固醇分析的校正因子。它主张在使用新型体积系统进行类固醇分析之前,对色谱效应进行全面分析。