Davidson Karina W, Shaffer Jonathan, Ye Siqin, Falzon Louise, Emeruwa Iheanacho O, Sundquist Kevin, Inneh Ifeoma A, Mascitelli Susan L, Manzano Wilhelmina M, Vawdrey David K, Ting Henry H
Department of Medicine, Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Value Institute, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Jul;26(7):596-606. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004758. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
Many hospital systems seek to improve patient satisfaction as assessed by the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) surveys. A systematic review of the current experimental evidence could inform these efforts and does not yet exist.
We conducted a systematic review of the literature by searching electronic databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, the six databases of the Cochrane Library and grey literature databases. We included studies involving hospital patients with interventions targeting at least 1 of the 11 HCAHPS domains, and that met our quality filter score on the 27-item Downs and Black coding scale. We calculated post hoc power when appropriate.
A total of 59 studies met inclusion criteria, out of these 44 did not meet the quality filter of 50% (average quality rating 27.8%±10.9%). Of the 15 studies that met the quality filter (average quality rating 67.3%±10.7%), 8 targeted the Communication with Doctors HCAHPS domain, 6 targeted Overall Hospital Rating, 5 targeted Communication with Nurses, 5 targeted Pain Management, 5 targeted Communication about Medicines, 5 targeted Recommend the Hospital, 3 targeted Quietness of the Hospital Environment, 3 targeted Cleanliness of the Hospital Environment and 3 targeted Discharge Information. Significant HCAHPS improvements were reported by eight interventions, but their generalisability may be limited by narrowly focused patient populations, heterogeneity of approach and other methodological concerns.
Although there are a few studies that show some improvement in HCAHPS score through various interventions, we conclude that more rigorous research is needed to identify effective and generalisable interventions to improve patient satisfaction.
许多医院系统都试图通过医疗服务提供者与系统消费者评估(HCAHPS)调查来提高患者满意度。目前尚未有对现有实验证据的系统评价可为这些努力提供参考。
我们通过检索电子数据库进行文献系统评价,包括MEDLINE和EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆的六个数据库以及灰色文献数据库。我们纳入了针对至少11个HCAHPS领域中1个领域进行干预的医院患者研究,且这些研究在27项唐斯和布莱克编码量表上达到我们的质量筛选分数。我们在适当的时候计算事后检验效能。
共有59项研究符合纳入标准,其中44项未达到50%的质量筛选标准(平均质量评分27.8%±10.9%)。在符合质量筛选标准的15项研究中(平均质量评分67.3%±10.7%),8项针对“与医生沟通”HCAHPS领域,6项针对“医院总体评价”,5项针对“与护士沟通”,5项针对“疼痛管理”,5项针对“药物沟通”,5项针对“推荐医院”,3项针对“医院环境安静程度”,3项针对“医院环境清洁程度”,3项针对“出院信息”。八项干预措施报告了HCAHPS的显著改善,但由于患者群体狭窄、方法异质性和其他方法学问题,其普遍性可能受到限制。
尽管有一些研究表明通过各种干预措施HCAHPS评分有所提高,但我们得出结论,需要更严格的研究来确定有效且可推广的干预措施以提高患者满意度。