Suppr超能文献

一项比较镇咳药对慢性咳嗽患者呼吸中枢输出影响的随机临床试验。

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the Effects of Antitussive Agents on Respiratory Center Output in Patients With Chronic Cough.

作者信息

Mannini Claudia, Lavorini Federico, Zanasi Alessandro, Saibene Federico, Lanata Luigi, Fontana Giovanni

机构信息

Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Pneumology Unit, University of Bologna, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Chest. 2017 Jun;151(6):1288-1294. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Feb 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cough is produced by the same neuronal pool implicated in respiratory rhythm generation, and antitussive drugs acting at the central level, such as opioids, may depress ventilation. Levodropropizine is classified as a nonopioid peripherally acting antitussive drug that acts at the level of airway sensory nerves. However, the lack of a central action by levodropropizine remains to be fully established. We set out to compare the effects of levodropropizine and the opioid antitussive agent dihydrocodeine on the respiratory responses to a conventional CO rebreathing test in patients with chronic cough of any origin.

METHODS

Twenty-four outpatients (aged 39-70 years) with chronic cough were studied. On separate runs, each patient was randomly administered 60 mg levodropropizine, 15 mg dihydrocodeine, or a matching placebo. Subsequently, patients breathed a mixture of 93% oxygen and 7% CO for 5 min. Fractional end-tidal CO (Fetco) and inspiratory minute ventilation (V˙i) were continuously monitored. Changes in breathing pattern variables were also assessed.

RESULTS

At variance with dihydrocodeine, levodropropizine and placebo did not affect respiratory responses to hypercapnia (P < .01). The ventilatory increases by hypercapnia were mainly accounted for by a rise in the volume components of the breathing pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

The results are consistent with a peripheral action by levodropropizine; the assessment of ventilatory responses to CO may represent a useful tool to investigate the central respiratory effects of antitussive agents.

TRIAL REGISTRY

European Union Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT No.: 2013-004735-68); URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/.

摘要

背景

咳嗽由参与呼吸节律产生的同一神经元池产生,作用于中枢水平的镇咳药,如阿片类药物,可能会抑制通气。左羟丙哌嗪被归类为一种非阿片类外周作用镇咳药,作用于气道感觉神经水平。然而,左羟丙哌嗪缺乏中枢作用仍有待充分证实。我们着手比较左羟丙哌嗪和阿片类镇咳药二氢可待因对任何病因引起的慢性咳嗽患者对传统二氧化碳重复呼吸试验的呼吸反应的影响。

方法

研究了24名年龄在39至70岁之间的慢性咳嗽门诊患者。在不同的时间段,每位患者被随机给予60毫克左羟丙哌嗪、15毫克二氢可待因或匹配的安慰剂。随后,患者吸入含93%氧气和7%二氧化碳的混合气体5分钟。持续监测呼气末二氧化碳分数(Fetco)和吸气分钟通气量(V˙i)。还评估了呼吸模式变量的变化。

结果

与二氢可待因不同,左羟丙哌嗪和安慰剂不影响对高碳酸血症的呼吸反应(P <.01)。高碳酸血症引起的通气增加主要是由呼吸模式的容积成分增加所致。

结论

结果与左羟丙哌嗪的外周作用一致;评估对二氧化碳的通气反应可能是研究镇咳药中枢呼吸作用的有用工具。

试验注册

欧盟临床试验注册库(EudraCT编号:2013-004735-68);网址:https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验