Prinsen Menk K, Hendriksen Coenraad F M, Krul Cyrille A M, Woutersen Ruud A
Triskelion B.V., P.O. Box 844, 3700 AJ Zeist, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University/Institute for Translational Vaccinology, P.O. Box 450, 3720 AL Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017 Apr;85:132-149. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
In 1944, Draize et al., published a paper entitled "Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes". The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development published their first guideline on eye irritation in 1981, using rabbits. In the early eighties the development of alternative non-animal tests to replace the Draize eye test started. The first attempts to validate alternative tests for eye irritation were considered to be relatively simple by comparing in vitro and in vivo irritation index scores. In the early nineteen-eighties, we introduced the use of isolated eyes as an alternative test for the Draize eye irritation test. What was expected to be a process of several years, however, turned out to be a decades spanning process still not fully completed. For a large part, this can be attributed to the nature of the in vivo test in rabbits, which is more complicated and compromised than originally believed. This paper describes, most chronologically, the development, performance, validation and application of the Isolated Eye Test and, in broader perspective, the international validation and acceptance of this alternative test by regulatory authorities and agencies.
1944年,德莱兹等人发表了一篇题为《研究局部应用于皮肤和黏膜的物质的刺激性和毒性的方法》的论文。经济合作与发展组织于1981年发布了其首份关于兔眼刺激试验的指南。20世纪80年代初,开始研发替代动物试验以取代德莱兹眼试验。通过比较体外和体内刺激指数评分,首次验证眼刺激替代试验的尝试被认为相对简单。20世纪80年代初,我们引入了离体眼作为德莱兹眼刺激试验的替代试验。然而,原本预计只需数年的过程,结果却变成了一个跨越数十年仍未完全完成的过程。在很大程度上,这可归因于兔体内试验的性质,它比最初认为的更为复杂且存在缺陷。本文按时间顺序描述了离体眼试验的发展、操作、验证及应用,并从更广泛的角度阐述了监管当局和机构对这种替代试验的国际验证及认可情况。