Fatima Akeela, Bashir Gulnaz, Wani Tehmeena, Jan Abiroo, Kohli Amrish, Khan Mosin S
Department of Microbiology, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2017 Jan-Mar;60(1):61-65. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.200023.
Candida spp. is an emerging cause of bloodstream infections worldwide. Delay in speciation of Candida isolates by conventional methods and resistance to antifungal drugs in various Candida species are responsible for the increase in morbidity and mortality due to candidemia. Hence, the rapid identification of Candida isolates is very important for the proper management of patients with candidemia.
The aim was to re-evaluate the identification of various Candida spp. by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and to evaluate the accuracy, speed, and cost of phenotypic methodology versus PCR-RFLP.
Hospital-based cross-sectional study.
Ninety consecutive clinical isolates of seven Candida species, isolated from blood of neonates and identified by routine phenotypic methods, were re-evaluated using universal primers internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) and ITS4 for PCR amplification and Msp I restriction enzyme for RFLP.
Kappa test for agreement.
The results of PCR-RFLP were 100% in agreement with those obtained using conventional phenotypic methods. Identification could be achieved within 3 work days by both the methods. Our routine methods proved to be cost effective than PCR-RFLP.
We can continue with our routine phenotypic methods and PCR-RFLP can be used for periodic quality control or when conventional methods fail to identify a species.
念珠菌属是全球血流感染的一个新兴病因。通过传统方法对念珠菌分离株进行菌种鉴定的延迟以及各种念珠菌属对抗真菌药物的耐药性,是导致念珠菌血症发病率和死亡率上升的原因。因此,快速鉴定念珠菌分离株对于念珠菌血症患者的恰当管理非常重要。
目的是通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)-限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)重新评估各种念珠菌属的鉴定,并评估表型方法与PCR-RFLP相比的准确性、速度和成本。
基于医院的横断面研究。
从新生儿血液中分离出的90株连续临床分离株,属于7种念珠菌属,通过常规表型方法进行鉴定,使用通用引物内部转录间隔区1(ITS1)和ITS4进行PCR扩增,并用Msp I限制性内切酶进行RFLP分析,对其进行重新评估。
一致性检验的Kappa检验。
PCR-RFLP的结果与使用传统表型方法获得的结果100%一致。两种方法均可在3个工作日内完成鉴定。我们的常规方法被证明比PCR-RFLP更具成本效益。
我们可以继续使用常规表型方法,PCR-RFLP可用于定期质量控制或当传统方法无法鉴定菌种时使用。