Freebury D R
University of Toronto, Ontario.
Can J Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;34(8):772-4. doi: 10.1177/070674378903400805.
Psychoanalysis has long distinguished between the transference neurosis and that part of the communication between therapist and patient which depends upon a relatively intact part of the patient's ego. It has been proposed that it is this capacity of the patient that sustains the difficult work of dealing with communications which are the consequence of transference, and which often threaten the viability of the treatment. This quality has been referred to variously as the unobjectionable positive transference, rational transference, mature transference, therapeutic alliance and working alliance. The ever broadening scope of Psychoanalysis, along with our greater knowledge of early childhood development, has enhanced our understanding of the many influences affecting the treatment alliances. Newer views of the transference, which stress the significance of the therapists' contributions to the therapeutic dyad, make it clear that the therapeutic alliance can no longer be explained as some simple, reality based, conflict free, motivating force. It involves, rather, a complex interaction of several factors, to each of which one must add the therapists' reciprocal reactions. Psychotherapy outcome research will need to take all of these factors into consideration.
长期以来,精神分析一直区分移情神经症与治疗师和患者之间的那部分交流,后者依赖于患者自我中相对完整的部分。有人提出,正是患者的这种能力维持了处理因移情产生的交流的艰巨工作,而这些交流往往威胁到治疗的可行性。这种特质被不同地称为无可非议的正向移情、理性移情、成熟移情、治疗联盟和工作联盟。精神分析不断拓宽的范围,以及我们对幼儿发展的更多了解,加深了我们对影响治疗联盟的诸多因素的理解。对移情的新观点强调了治疗师对治疗二元组的贡献的重要性,这表明治疗联盟不能再被解释为某种简单的、基于现实的、无冲突的动力。相反,它涉及几个因素的复杂相互作用,对于每个因素,都必须加上治疗师的相互反应。心理治疗结果研究需要考虑所有这些因素。