Overholser J C
Department of Psychology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Can J Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;34(8):785-90. doi: 10.1177/070674378903400808.
A number of authors have questioned the rationale for subdividing the DSM-II schizoid diagnosis into three separate personality disorders in DSM-III, the schizoid, avoidant, and schizotypal. The present study was designed to explore differences between psychiatric patients with schizoid and avoidant personalities as compared to psychiatric controls with no personality disorder. Differences were examined on demographic data, self-report measures, and clinical information. A Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) revealed a significant overall effect for groups across MMPI subscales. However, subsequent univariate Analyses of Variance (ANOVA's) revealed that almost all differences were between the two personality disorder groups as compared to the psychiatric controls. Contrary to expectations, schizoid and avoidant personalities were found to display equivalent levels of anxiety, depression, and psychotic tendencies as compared to psychiatric control patients. No meaningful distinctions were found between the avoidant and the schizoid personalities. Results are discussed in terms of problems with the assessment methods and the diagnostic criteria.
许多作者对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第二版(DSM-II)中分裂样人格障碍诊断在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)中被细分为三种独立人格障碍(分裂样、回避型和分裂型)的基本原理提出了质疑。本研究旨在探讨患有分裂样人格和回避型人格的精神病患者与无人格障碍的精神病对照组之间的差异。对人口统计学数据、自我报告测量和临床信息方面的差异进行了检查。多变量方差分析(MANOVA)显示,在明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)各分量表上,各组之间存在显著的总体效应。然而,随后的单变量方差分析(ANOVA)显示,与精神病对照组相比,几乎所有差异都存在于两种人格障碍组之间。与预期相反,与精神病对照患者相比,发现分裂样人格和回避型人格表现出同等程度的焦虑、抑郁和精神病倾向。在回避型人格和分裂样人格之间未发现有意义的区别。从评估方法和诊断标准的问题方面对结果进行了讨论。