Suppr超能文献

人格障碍分类中人际方法与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版方法的实证比较。

An empirical comparison of interpersonal and DSM-III approaches to classification of personality disorders.

作者信息

Morey L C

出版信息

Psychiatry. 1985 Nov;48(4):358-64. doi: 10.1080/00332747.1985.11024296.

Abstract

In recent years, a number of authors have attempted to map correspondences between interpersonal models and traditional psychiatric classification. Many of the proposed relationships are plausible from a theoretical standpoint, but at present little empirical evidence has been gathered in support of these speculations. This paper describes the results of a project that suggests that the convergence of these two approaches to personality taxonomy is not as high as might be expected. In particular, it seems that DSM-III personality disorders are not as differentiated with respect to affiliative needs as has been hypothesized.

摘要

近年来,许多作者试图描绘人际模型与传统精神疾病分类之间的对应关系。从理论角度来看,许多提出的关系似乎是合理的,但目前几乎没有收集到实证证据来支持这些推测。本文描述了一个项目的结果,该结果表明这两种人格分类方法的趋同性并不像预期的那么高。特别是,DSM-III人格障碍在归属需求方面的差异似乎并不像假设的那么大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验