• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测性基因检测及其他:一种参与理论。

Predictive genetic testing and beyond: a theory of engagement.

机构信息

Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

J Health Psychol. 2002 Sep;7(5):491-508. doi: 10.1177/1359105302007005628.

DOI:10.1177/1359105302007005628
PMID:22113136
Abstract

This article presents a tentative grounded theory, which can provide some explanation of variation in behaviour around predictive genetic testing (PGT) for Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC), based on interviews with individuals (n = 55) from families with a clinical diagnosis of HNPCC, 12 of whom were followed through the PGT protocol. The theory is built around a core category of engagement, a newly constructed concept reflecting the degree of cognitive and emotional involvement with cancer risk in individuals from these families, and models the psychosocial process of engaging with cancer risk. The degree of engagement at the time of testing can explain variations in approaches and reactions to PGT. A series of social factors, many related to the experiences of family life, emerged as either facilitating or blocking the process of engaging with cancer risk; a series of psychological factors emerged as interacting in a recursive, dynamic manner with each other and with engagement status. The degree of engagement can change with the unfolding of time and events in family life. The theory of engagement (TE) provides an explanatory framework for understanding behaviour related to PGT for HNPCC, and can potentially be applied to research on risk perception in the social sciences more generally. In addition, the theory may have potential uses in the genetics clinic, in identifying individuals at risk of adverse reactions to PGT for cancer, thus enabling better targeting of genetic counselling resources.

摘要

本文提出了一个试探性的扎根理论,该理论基于对 55 名具有临床诊断的遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)家族的个体(n=55)的访谈,以及通过 PGT 协议随访的 12 名个体,为预测性遗传检测(PGT)在 HNPCC 周围行为变化提供了一些解释。该理论围绕着一个核心范畴“参与”构建,这是一个新构建的概念,反映了这些家庭中个体对癌症风险的认知和情感投入程度,并构建了与癌症风险接触的心理社会过程模型。测试时的参与程度可以解释对 PGT 的方法和反应的变化。一系列社会因素,许多与家庭生活的经历有关,被认为是促进或阻碍与癌症风险接触的过程;一系列心理因素以递归、动态的方式相互作用,并与参与状态相互作用。参与程度会随着家庭生活中时间和事件的展开而变化。参与理论(TE)为理解与 HNPCC 的 PGT 相关的行为提供了一个解释框架,并有可能更广泛地应用于社会科学中的风险感知研究。此外,该理论在遗传诊所可能具有潜在用途,用于识别对癌症 PGT 不良反应风险的个体,从而能够更好地针对遗传咨询资源。

相似文献

1
Predictive genetic testing and beyond: a theory of engagement.预测性基因检测及其他:一种参与理论。
J Health Psychol. 2002 Sep;7(5):491-508. doi: 10.1177/1359105302007005628.
2
Comparison of individuals opting for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC genetic susceptibility testing with regard to coping, illness perceptions, illness experiences, family system characteristics and hereditary cancer distress.选择进行BRCA1/2或遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)基因易感性检测的个体在应对方式、疾病认知、疾病经历、家庭系统特征和遗传性癌症困扰方面的比较。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Jan;65(1):58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.05.006. Epub 2006 Jul 26.
3
Personal theories of inheritance, coping strategies, risk perception and engagement in hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer families offered genetic testing.在遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌家族中,个人的遗传理论、应对策略、风险认知以及参与情况促使了基因检测的开展。
Clin Genet. 2003 Sep;64(3):179-89. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2003.00133.x.
4
How families communicate about HNPCC genetic testing: findings from a qualitative study.家庭如何就遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌基因检测进行沟通:一项定性研究的结果
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2003 May 15;119C(1):78-86. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.10010.
5
The use of genetic testing in hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: genetic testing in HNPCC, (A)FAP and MAP.遗传性结直肠癌综合征中基因检测的应用:遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)、(非典型)家族性腺瘤性息肉病((A)FAP)和微卫星高度不稳定型结直肠癌(MAP)中的基因检测
Clin Genet. 2007 Dec;72(6):562-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00912.x. Epub 2007 Oct 7.
6
Psychosocial outcome following genetic risk counselling for familial colorectal cancer. A comparison of affected patients and family members.家族性结直肠癌遗传风险咨询后的心理社会结局。患病患者与家庭成员的比较。
Clin Genet. 2008 Nov;74(5):414-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.01089.x.
7
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.预防性卵巢切除术:降低美国上皮性卵巢癌死亡率。一场持续的争论。
Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330.
8
Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: an update of the literature.癌症易感性基因检测的心理影响:文献综述更新
Psychooncology. 2005 Dec;14(12):1060-74. doi: 10.1002/pon.933.
9
[Prevention of colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer].[遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌家族中结直肠癌的预防]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 Jan 13;165(3):221-5.
10
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Secure Website to Facilitate Information Sharing in Families at High Risk of Bowel Cancer-The Familyweb Study.开发一个安全网站以促进高危肠癌家庭的信息共享——家庭网络研究
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 16;13(10):2404. doi: 10.3390/cancers13102404.
2
The Concept and Components of Engagement in Different Domains Applied to eHealth: A Systematic Scoping Review.应用于电子健康领域的不同维度参与的概念与组成部分:一项系统性综述。
Front Psychol. 2020 May 27;11:926. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00926. eCollection 2020.
3
How the "control-fate continuum" helps explain the genetic testing decision-making process: a grounded theory study.
“控制命运连续体”如何帮助解释基因检测决策过程:扎根理论研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Aug;28(8):1010-1019. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0602-3. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
4
Choosing not to know: accounts of non-engagement with pre-symptomatic testing for Machado-Joseph disease.选择不知道:Machado-Joseph 病的无症状前检测不参与的情况说明。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Mar;27(3):353-359. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0308-y. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
5
Discussions about predictive genetic testing for Lynch syndrome: the role of health professionals and families in decisions to decline.关于林奇综合征预测性基因检测的讨论:健康专业人员和家庭在拒绝检测决定中的作用。
Fam Cancer. 2018 Oct;17(4):547-555. doi: 10.1007/s10689-018-0078-2.
6
Choosing not to undergo predictive genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: expanding our understanding of decliners and declining.选择不接受遗传性结直肠癌综合征的预测性基因检测:拓展我们对拒绝者及拒绝行为的理解
J Behav Med. 2017 Aug;40(4):583-594. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9820-0. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
7
"Awakening to" a new meaning of being at-risk for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a grounded theory study.“觉醒于”致心律失常性右室心肌病风险的新含义:一项扎根理论研究
J Community Genet. 2015 Apr;6(2):167-75. doi: 10.1007/s12687-015-0212-x. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
8
Development and preliminary testing of the psychosocial adjustment to hereditary diseases scale.遗传性疾病心理社会适应量表的编制与初步测试。
BMC Psychol. 2013 Apr 30;1(1):7. doi: 10.1186/2050-7283-1-7. eCollection 2013.
9
Making the decision to participate in predictive genetic testing for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.决定参与致心律失常性右室心肌病的预测性基因检测。
J Genet Couns. 2014 Dec;23(6):1045-55. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9733-4. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
10
Crowdsourcing awareness: exploration of the ovarian cancer knowledge gap through Amazon Mechanical Turk.众包认知:通过亚马逊土耳其机器人平台探索卵巢癌知识差距
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e85508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085508. eCollection 2014.