Suppr超能文献

以生态毒理学案例研究为例的不良结局途径开发与证据权重评估的实用方法

Practical approaches to adverse outcome pathway development and weight-of-evidence evaluation as illustrated by ecotoxicological case studies.

作者信息

Fay Kellie A, Villeneuve Daniel L, LaLone Carlie A, Song You, Tollefsen Knut Erik, Ankley Gerald T

机构信息

Mid- Continent Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.

University of Minnesota-Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2017 Jun;36(6):1429-1449. doi: 10.1002/etc.3770. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

Abstract

Adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) describe toxicant effects as a sequential chain of causally linked events beginning with a molecular perturbation and culminating in an adverse outcome at an individual or population level. Strategies for developing AOPs are still evolving and depend largely on the intended use or motivation for development and data availability. The present review describes 4 ecotoxicological AOP case studies, developed for different purposes. In each situation, creation of the AOP began in a manner determined by the initial motivation for its creation and expanded either to include additional components of the pathway or to address the domains of applicability in terms of chemical initiators, susceptible species, life stages, and so forth. Some general strategies can be gleaned from these case studies, which a developer may find to be useful for supporting an existing AOP or creating a new one. Several web-based tools that can aid in AOP assembly and evaluation of weight of evidence for scientific robustness of AOP components are highlighted. Environ Toxicol Chem 2017;36:1429-1449. © 2017 SETAC.

摘要

不良结局途径(AOPs)将毒物效应描述为一系列因果相关事件的连续链条,始于分子扰动,最终在个体或群体水平上导致不良结局。开发AOPs的策略仍在不断发展,很大程度上取决于开发的预期用途或动机以及数据的可用性。本综述描述了4个为不同目的而开发的生态毒理学AOP案例研究。在每种情况下,AOP的创建都以由其创建的初始动机决定的方式开始,并扩展到包括途径的其他组成部分,或在化学引发剂、易感物种、生命阶段等方面解决适用范围。可以从这些案例研究中收集一些通用策略,开发人员可能会发现这些策略有助于支持现有的AOP或创建新的AOP。文中强调了几种基于网络的工具,这些工具可以帮助进行AOP组装和评估AOP组件科学稳健性的证据权重。《环境毒理学与化学》2017年;36:1429 - 1449。© 2017 SETAC。

相似文献

3
Adverse outcome pathway networks II: Network analytics.不良结局途径网络 II:网络分析。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2018 Jun;37(6):1734-1748. doi: 10.1002/etc.4124. Epub 2018 May 7.
8
Adverse outcome pathway networks I: Development and applications.不良结局路径网络 I:开发与应用。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2018 Jun;37(6):1723-1733. doi: 10.1002/etc.4125. Epub 2018 May 7.

引用本文的文献

3
Adverse Outcome Pathways for Chronic Copper Toxicity to Fish and Amphibians.鱼类和两栖类慢性铜毒性的不良结局途径
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2022 Dec;41(12):2911-2927. doi: 10.1002/etc.5483. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
10
An ecotoxicological view on neurotoxicity assessment.神经毒性评估的生态毒理学视角
Environ Sci Eur. 2018;30(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12302-018-0173-x. Epub 2018 Dec 14.

本文引用的文献

7
A weight of evidence assessment approach for adverse outcome pathways.不良结局途径的证据权重评估方法。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016 Mar;75:46-57. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.12.014. Epub 2015 Dec 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验