ORISE Research Participant at the US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Atlantic Coastal Environmental Sciences Division, Narragansett, Rhode Island.
US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Atlantic Coastal Environmental Sciences Division, Narragansett, Rhode Island.
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2020 Aug;39(8):1472-1484. doi: 10.1002/etc.4757. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
As contaminant exposures in aquatic ecosystems continue to increase, the need for streamlining research efforts in environmental toxicology using predictive frameworks also grows. One such framework is the adverse outcome pathway (AOP). An AOP framework organizes and utilizes toxicological information to connect measurable molecular endpoints to an adverse outcome of regulatory relevance via a series of events at different levels of biological organization. Molecular endpoints or biomarkers are essential to develop AOPs and are valuable early warning signs of the toxicity of pollutants, including contaminants of emerging concern. Ecological risk-assessment approaches using tools such as biomarkers and AOPs benefit from identification of molecular targets conserved across species. Bivalve models are useful in such approaches and integral to our understanding of ecological and human health risks associated with contaminant exposures. We discuss the value of using biomarker approaches in bivalve models to meet the demands of twenty-first-century toxicology. Environ Toxicol Chem 2020;39:1472-1484. © 2020 SETAC.
随着水生生态系统中污染物暴露的不断增加,利用预测框架简化环境毒理学研究工作的需求也在增加。其中一个框架是不良结局途径 (AOP)。AOP 框架通过一系列在不同生物组织层次上的事件,将可测量的分子终点与具有监管相关性的不良结局联系起来,从而组织和利用毒理学信息。分子终点或生物标志物对于开发 AOP 至关重要,并且是污染物(包括新出现的关注污染物)毒性的有价值的早期预警信号。使用生物标志物和 AOP 等工具的生态风险评估方法受益于识别跨物种保守的分子靶标。双壳贝类模型在这些方法中很有用,并且是我们理解与污染物暴露相关的生态和人类健康风险的关键。我们讨论了在双壳贝类模型中使用生物标志物方法的价值,以满足 21 世纪毒理学的需求。Environ Toxicol Chem 2020;39:1472-1484. © 2020 SETAC.