Simmons Sandra F, Hollingsworth Emily K, Long Emily A, Liu Xulei, Shotwell Matthew S, Keeler Emmett, An Ruopeng, Silver Heidi J
Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Center for Quality Aging, Nashville, Tennessee.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Feb;65(2):313-322. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14488. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
To determine the effect and cost-effectiveness of training nonnursing staff to provide feeding assistance for nutritionally at-risk nursing home (NH) residents.
Randomized, controlled trial.
Five community NHs.
Long-stay NH residents with an order for caloric supplementation (N = 122).
Research staff provided an 8-hour training curriculum to nonnursing staff. Trained staff were assigned to between-meal supplement or snack delivery for the intervention group; the control group received usual care.
Research staff used standardized observations and weighed-intake methods to measure frequency of between-meal delivery, staff assistance time, and resident caloric intake.
Fifty staff (mean 10 per site) completed training. The intervention had a significant effect on between-meal caloric intake (F = 56.29, P < .001), with the intervention group consuming, on average, 163.33 (95% CI = 120.19-206.47) calories per person per day more than the usual care control group. The intervention costs were $1.27 per person per day higher than usual care (P < .001). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the intervention was 134 kcal per dollar. The increase in cost was due to the higher frequency and number of snack items given per person per day and the associated staff time to provide assistance.
It is cost effective to train nonnursing staff to provide caloric supplementation, and this practice has a positive effect on residents' between-meal intake.
确定培训非护理人员为营养风险较高的养老院居民提供喂食协助的效果及成本效益。
随机对照试验。
五家社区养老院。
有热量补充医嘱的长期居住养老院居民(N = 122)。
研究人员为非护理人员提供了8小时的培训课程。将经过培训的人员分配到干预组,为居民提供餐间补充食物或零食;对照组接受常规护理。
研究人员采用标准化观察和称重摄入法来测量餐间送餐频率、工作人员协助时间以及居民热量摄入。
50名工作人员(每个地点平均10名)完成了培训。干预措施对餐间热量摄入有显著影响(F = 56.29,P < .001),干预组平均每人每天比常规护理对照组多摄入163.33(95%可信区间 = 120.19 - 206.47)卡路里。干预成本比常规护理每天每人高1.27美元(P < .001)。干预措施的增量成本效益比为每美元134千卡。成本增加是由于每人每天提供的零食频率和数量增加以及相关的工作人员协助时间。
培训非护理人员提供热量补充具有成本效益,并且这种做法对居民的餐间摄入量有积极影响。