Suppr超能文献

使用高达4500 s/mm2的b值评估不同数学模型和不同b值范围的扩散加权成像在外周带前列腺癌检测中的应用。

Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm2.

作者信息

Feng Zhaoyan, Min Xiangde, Margolis Daniel J A, Duan Caohui, Chen Yuping, Sah Vivek Kumar, Chaudhary Nabin, Li Basen, Ke Zan, Zhang Peipei, Wang Liang

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Feb 15;12(2):e0172127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172127. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in peripheral zone prostate cancer (PZ PCa) detection.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients with histologically proven PZ PCa who underwent DWI-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using 21 b-values (0-4500 s/mm2) were included. The mean signal intensities of the regions of interest (ROIs) placed in benign PZs and cancerous tissues on DWI images were fitted using mono-exponential, bi-exponential, stretched-exponential, and kurtosis models. The b-values were divided into four ranges: 0-1000, 0-2000, 0-3200, and 0-4500 s/mm2, grouped as A, B, C, and D, respectively. ADC, , D*, f, DDC, α, Dapp, and Kapp were estimated for each group. The adjusted coefficient of determination (R2) was calculated to measure goodness-of-fit. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the parameters.

RESULTS

All parameters except D* showed significant differences between cancerous tissues and benign PZs in each group. The area under the curve values (AUCs) of ADC were comparable in groups C and D (p = 0.980) and were significantly higher than those in groups A and B (p< 0.05 for all). The AUCs of ADC and Kapp in groups B and C were similar (p = 0.07 and p = 0.954), and were significantly higher than the other parameters (p< 0.001 for all). The AUCs of ADC in group D was slightly higher than Kapp (p = 0.002), and both were significantly higher than the other parameters (p< 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

ADC derived from conventional mono-exponential high b-value (3200 s/mm2) models is an optimal parameter for PZ PCa detection.

摘要

目的

评估不同数学模型及不同b值范围的扩散加权成像(DWI)在外周带前列腺癌(PZ PCa)检测中的诊断性能。

方法

纳入56例经组织学证实为PZ PCa且接受了使用21个b值(0 - 4500 s/mm²)的DWI磁共振成像(MRI)检查的患者。使用单指数、双指数、拉伸指数和峰度模型拟合DWI图像上置于良性外周带和癌组织的感兴趣区域(ROI)的平均信号强度。b值被分为四个范围:0 - 1000、0 - 2000、0 - 3200和0 - 4500 s/mm²,分别分组为A、B、C和D组。为每组估计表观扩散系数(ADC)、平均扩散系数()、扩散系数(D*)、灌注分数(f)、双扩散系数(DDC)、拉伸指数扩散系数(α)、表观扩散率(Dapp)和峰度(Kapp)。计算调整决定系数(R²)以衡量拟合优度。进行受试者操作特征曲线分析以评估参数的诊断性能。

结果

除D*外,每组癌组织与良性外周带之间所有参数均存在显著差异。C组和D组的ADC曲线下面积值(AUC)相当(p = 0.980),且显著高于A组和B组(所有p < 0.05)。B组和C组的ADC和Kapp的AUC相似(p = 0.07和p = 0.954),且显著高于其他参数(所有p < 0.001)。D组的ADC的AUC略高于Kapp(p = 0.002),且两者均显著高于其他参数(所有p < 0.001)。

结论

源自传统单指数高b值(3200 s/mm²)模型的ADC是PZ PCa检测的最佳参数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5f/5310778/61184e945899/pone.0172127.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验