Murai Taro, Hattori Yukiko, Sugie Chikao, Iwata Hiromitsu, Iwabuchi Michio, Shibamoto Yuta
Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan.
J Radiat Res. 2017 Sep 1;58(5):693-700. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrw130.
Multileaf collimator (MLC) technology has been newly introduced with the Cyberknife system. This study investigated the advantages of this system compared with the conventional circular collimator (CC) system. Dosimetric comparisons of MLC and CC plans were carried out. First, to investigate suitable target sizes for the MLC mode, MLC and CC plans were generated using computed tomography (CT) images from 5 patients for 1, 3, 5 and 7 cm diameter targets. Second, MLC and CC plans were compared in 10 patients, each with liver and prostate targets. For brain targets, doses to the brain could be spared in MLC plans better than in CC plans (P ≤ 0.02). The MLC mode also achieved more uniform dose delivery to the targets. The conformity index in MLC plans was stable, irrespective of the target size (P = 0.5). For patients with liver tumors, the MLC mode achieved higher target coverage than the CC mode (P = 0.04). For prostate tumors, doses to the rectum and the conformity index were lowered in MLC plans compared with in CC plans (P ≤ 0.04). In all target plans, treatment times in MLC plans were shorter than those in CC plans (P < 0.001). The newly introduced MLC technology can reduce treatment time and provide favorable or comparable dose distribution for 1-7 cm targets. In particular, the MLC mode has dosimetric advantage for targets near organs at risk. Therefore, the MLC mode is recommended as the first option in stereotactic body radiotherapy.
射波刀系统新引入了多叶准直器(MLC)技术。本研究调查了该系统与传统圆形准直器(CC)系统相比的优势。对MLC和CC计划进行了剂量学比较。首先,为了研究MLC模式下合适的靶区大小,利用5例患者的计算机断层扫描(CT)图像生成了直径为1、3、5和7 cm靶区的MLC和CC计划。其次,对10例分别患有肝脏和前列腺靶区的患者的MLC和CC计划进行了比较。对于脑部靶区,MLC计划中对脑的剂量比CC计划能更好地 sparing(P≤0.02)。MLC模式还实现了对靶区更均匀的剂量分布。MLC计划中的适形指数稳定,与靶区大小无关(P = 0.5)。对于肝肿瘤患者,MLC模式比CC模式实现了更高的靶区覆盖(P = 0.04)。对于前列腺肿瘤,与CC计划相比,MLC计划中直肠的剂量和适形指数降低(P≤0.04)。在所有靶区计划中,MLC计划的治疗时间比CC计划短(P < 0.001)。新引入的MLC技术可缩短治疗时间,并为1 - 7 cm靶区提供良好或可比的剂量分布。特别是,MLC模式对于靠近危及器官的靶区具有剂量学优势。因此,在立体定向体部放射治疗中,MLC模式被推荐为首选方案。 (注:sparing此处可能是“ sparing effect”的省略,意为“ sparing效应(保护效应)”,但按要求未添加解释,直接保留英文)