• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CTA与数字减影血管造影在破裂动脉瘤诊断中的比较

Comparison Between CTA and Digital Subtraction Angiography in the Diagnosis of Ruptured Aneurysms.

作者信息

Philipp Lucas R, McCracken D Jay, McCracken Courtney E, Halani Sameer H, Lovasik Brendan P, Salehani Arsalaan A, Boulter Jason H, Cawley C Michael, Grossberg Jonathan A, Barrow Daniel L, Pradilla Gustavo

机构信息

Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Department of Neu-rosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2017 May 1;80(5):769-777. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw113.

DOI:10.1093/neuros/nyw113
PMID:28201559
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Computerized tomography angiography (CTA) is commonly used to diagnose ruptured cerebral aneurysms with sensitivities reported as high as 97% to 100%. Studies validating CTA accuracy in the setting of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) are scarce and limited by small sample sizes.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CTA in detecting intracranial aneurysms in the setting of SAH.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective cohort of 643 patients was reviewed. A total of 401 patients were identified whose diagnostic workup included both CTA and confirmatory digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Aneurysms missed by CTA but diagnosed by DSA were further stratified by size and location.

RESULTS

Three hundred and thirty aneurysms were detected by CTA while DSA detected a total of 431 aneurysms. False positive CTA results were seen for 24 aneurysms. DSA identified 125 aneurysms that were missed by CTA and 83.2% of those were <5 mm in diameter. The sensitivity of CTA was 57.6% for aneurysms smaller than 5 mm in size, and 45% for aneurysms originating from the internal carotid artery. The overall sensitivity of CTA in the setting of SAH was 70.7%.

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of CTA in the diagnosis of ruptured intracranial aneurysm may be lower than previously reported. CTA has a low sensitivity for aneurysms less than 5 mm in size, in locations adjacent to bony structures, and for those arising from small caliber parent vessels. It is our recommendation that CTA should be used with caution when used alone in the diagnosis of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

摘要

背景

计算机断层血管造影(CTA)常用于诊断破裂性脑动脉瘤,其敏感性报告高达97%至100%。在蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)情况下验证CTA准确性的研究很少,且受样本量小的限制。

目的

评估CTA在SAH情况下检测颅内动脉瘤的诊断准确性。

方法

回顾了一个单中心的643例患者的回顾性队列。共确定了401例患者,其诊断检查包括CTA和确定性数字减影血管造影(DSA)。CTA漏诊但DSA诊断出的动脉瘤按大小和位置进一步分层。

结果

CTA检测到330个动脉瘤,而DSA共检测到431个动脉瘤。CTA出现24例假阳性结果。DSA识别出125个CTA漏诊的动脉瘤,其中83.2%直径小于5mm。对于直径小于5mm的动脉瘤,CTA的敏感性为57.6%,对于起源于颈内动脉的动脉瘤,敏感性为45%。CTA在SAH情况下的总体敏感性为70.7%。

结论

CTA在诊断破裂性颅内动脉瘤方面的准确性可能低于先前报道。CTA对直径小于5mm、位于骨结构附近以及起源于小口径供血血管的动脉瘤敏感性较低。我们建议,单独使用CTA诊断破裂性颅内动脉瘤时应谨慎。

相似文献

1
Comparison Between CTA and Digital Subtraction Angiography in the Diagnosis of Ruptured Aneurysms.CTA与数字减影血管造影在破裂动脉瘤诊断中的比较
Neurosurgery. 2017 May 1;80(5):769-777. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw113.
2
Computed tomographic angiography versus digital subtraction angiography for the diagnosis and early treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.计算机断层血管造影术与数字减影血管造影术在颅内破裂动脉瘤诊断及早期治疗中的应用比较
Neurosurgery. 1999 Dec;45(6):1315-20; discussion 1320-2. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199912000-00008.
3
CT angiography in non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage: the importance of arterial attenuation for the detection of intracranial aneurysms.非创伤性蛛网膜下腔出血的CT血管造影:动脉衰减对颅内动脉瘤检测的重要性。
Acta Radiol. 2015 Oct;56(10):1248-55. doi: 10.1177/0284185114551976. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
4
A Multicenter Analysis of Computed Tomography Angiography Alone Versus Digital Subtraction Angiography for the Surgical Treatment of Poor-Grade Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.单纯计算机断层扫描血管造影术与数字减影血管造影术用于治疗低级别动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的多中心分析
World Neurosurg. 2016 Jul;91:106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.03.099. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
5
Multislice CT angiography in the selection of patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms suitable for clipping or coiling.多层螺旋CT血管造影在选择适合夹闭或栓塞治疗的颅内破裂动脉瘤患者中的应用。
Neuroradiology. 2007 Dec;49(12):997-1007. doi: 10.1007/s00234-007-0293-2. Epub 2007 Sep 22.
6
Accuracy of computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms.计算机断层血管造影术在颅内动脉瘤诊断中的准确性。
World Neurosurg. 2013 Dec;80(6):845-52. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.12.001. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
7
Dual-energy CT angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: image quality, radiation dose, and comparison with 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography.双能量 CT 血管造影在颅内动脉瘤评估中的应用:图像质量、辐射剂量,以及与三维旋转数字减影血管造影的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jan;194(1):23-30. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2290.
8
Treatment decision in ruptured intracranial aneurysms: comparison between multi-detector row CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography.破裂颅内动脉瘤的治疗决策:多层螺旋CT血管造影与数字减影血管造影的比较
J Neuroradiol. 2007 Oct;34(4):243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2007.07.006. Epub 2007 Aug 29.
9
Experience with computed tomographic angiography for the detection of intracranial aneurysms in the setting of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage.计算机断层血管造影术在急性蛛网膜下腔出血情况下检测颅内动脉瘤的经验。
Neurosurgery. 1997 Sep;41(3):522-7; discussion 527-8. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199709000-00003.
10
Therapeutic decision and management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage based on computed tomographic angiography.基于计算机断层血管造影术的动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的治疗决策与管理
Br J Neurosurg. 2003 Feb;17(1):46-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Usefulness of Direct Auricular Artery Injection as Refinement of the Well-Established Rabbit Blood Shunt Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Model.直接耳动脉注射作为完善成熟兔血液分流蛛网膜下腔出血模型的效用
Brain Sci. 2025 Jul 31;15(8):826. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15080826.
2
Development of a deep-learning algorithm for etiological classification of subarachnoid hemorrhage using non-contrast CT scans.利用非增强CT扫描开发用于蛛网膜下腔出血病因分类的深度学习算法。
Eur Radiol. 2025 May 17. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11666-2.
3
CTA image segmentation method for intracranial aneurysms based on MGLIA net.
基于MGLIA网络的颅内动脉瘤CTA图像分割方法
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 27;15(1):10593. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95143-2.
4
Evaluating a clinically available artificial intelligence model for intracranial aneurysm detection: a multi-reader study and algorithmic audit.评估一种用于颅内动脉瘤检测的临床可用人工智能模型:一项多读者研究及算法审核
Neuroradiology. 2025 Apr;67(4):855-864. doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03536-3. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
5
Clinical-Radiomics Nomogram Model Based on CT Angiography for Prediction of Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture: A Multicenter Study.基于CT血管造影的临床-影像组学列线图模型预测颅内动脉瘤破裂:一项多中心研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Dec 10;17:5917-5926. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S491697. eCollection 2024.
6
Optimizing clinical decision-making for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: Current applications and future directions of computed tomography angiography.优化颅内破裂动脉瘤的临床决策:计算机断层血管造影的当前应用及未来方向
World J Radiol. 2024 Nov 28;16(11):700-702. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i11.700.
7
Integrated Deep Learning Model for the Detection, Segmentation, and Morphologic Analysis of Intracranial Aneurysms Using CT Angiography.使用CT血管造影术进行颅内动脉瘤检测、分割和形态学分析的集成深度学习模型
Radiol Artif Intell. 2025 Jan;7(1):e240017. doi: 10.1148/ryai.240017.
8
A simple and effective machine learning model for predicting the stability of intracranial aneurysms using CT angiography.一种使用CT血管造影术预测颅内动脉瘤稳定性的简单有效的机器学习模型。
Front Neurol. 2024 Jun 19;15:1398225. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1398225. eCollection 2024.
9
Assessing the Impact of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model for Intracranial Aneurysm Detection in CT Angiography on Patient Diagnosis and Outcomes (IDEAL Study)-a protocol for a multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlled trial.评估基于人工智能的 CT 血管造影颅内动脉瘤检测模型对患者诊断和结局的影响(IDEAL 研究)-一项多中心、双盲随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2024 Jun 4;25(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08184-9.
10
The novel imaging methods in diagnosis and assessment of cerebrovascular diseases: an overview.脑血管疾病诊断与评估中的新型成像方法:综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 10;11:1269742. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1269742. eCollection 2024.