Suppr超能文献

紫杉醇联合吉西他滨治疗转移性胰腺癌:MPACT试验西欧队列的亚组分析

-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a subgroup analysis of the Western European cohort of the MPACT trial.

作者信息

Tabernero Josep, Kunzmann Volker, Scheithauer Werner, Reni Michele, Shiansong Li Jack, Ferrara Stefano, Djazouli Kamel

机构信息

Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.

Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Onco Targets Ther. 2017 Feb 2;10:591-596. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S124097. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The global Phase III MPACT trial demonstrated superior efficacy of -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine over gemcitabine alone as first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer. Region was a randomization stratification factor in the MPACT trial. This subgroup analysis of MPACT examined efficacy and safety of patients treated in Western Europe.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine or gemcitabine alone as first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer as previously described. A total of 76 patients were included in this analysis (n=38 for each arm).

RESULTS

Differences between the overall Western European cohort and the intention-to-treat population included lower percentages of male patients (46% and 58%, respectively) and patients with biliary stents (8% and 17%), and higher percentages of patients with Karnofsky performance status of 90-100 (78% and 60%) and primary tumors in the body of the pancreas (48% and 31%). The median overall survival was 10.7 months with -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs 6.9 months with gemcitabine alone (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-1.40]; =0.471). Median progression-free survival was 5.3 vs 3.7 months, respectively (HR: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.37-1.33]; =0.277). The independently assessed overall response rate was 18% vs 5% (response rate ratio, 3.50 [95% CI: 0.78-15.78]; =0.076). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events with -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and gemcitabine alone were neutropenia (46% vs 33%, respectively), leukopenia (35% vs 19%), anemia (22% vs 0%), asthenia (21% vs 6%), thrombocytopenia (14% vs 3%), and peripheral neuropathy (13% vs 3%).

CONCLUSION

Although a statistically significant difference between the treatment arms was not reached for efficacy endpoints, this study does report treatment benefit and a manageable safety profile associated with -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients treated in Western Europe with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

摘要

目的

全球III期MPACT试验表明,对于转移性胰腺癌的一线治疗,白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合吉西他滨的疗效优于单用吉西他滨。地区是MPACT试验中的一个随机分层因素。这项MPACT试验的亚组分析研究了在西欧接受治疗的患者的疗效和安全性。

患者与方法

患者如前所述接受白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合吉西他滨或单用吉西他滨作为转移性胰腺癌的一线治疗。本分析共纳入76例患者(每组n = 38)。

结果

西欧总体队列与意向性治疗人群之间的差异包括男性患者比例较低(分别为46%和58%)、有胆管支架的患者比例较低(8%和17%),以及卡氏功能状态为90 - 100的患者比例较高(78%和60%)和胰腺体部原发性肿瘤患者比例较高(48%和31%)。白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合吉西他滨组的中位总生存期为10.7个月,而单用吉西他滨组为6.9个月(风险比[HR]:0.82[95%置信区间(CI):0.48 - 1.40];P = 0.471)。中位无进展生存期分别为5.3个月和3.7个月(HR:0.70[95%CI:0.37 - 1.33];P = 0.277)。独立评估的总体缓解率分别为18%和5%(缓解率比,3.50[95%CI:0.78 - 15.78];P = 0.076)。白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合吉西他滨组和单用吉西他滨组最常见的≥3级不良事件分别为中性粒细胞减少(分别为46%和33%)、白细胞减少(35%和19%)、贫血(22%和0%)、乏力(21%和6%)、血小板减少(14%和3%)以及周围神经病变(13%和3%)。

结论

尽管在疗效终点方面未达到治疗组之间的统计学显著差异,但本研究确实报告了在西欧接受治疗的转移性胰腺癌患者中,白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合吉西他滨具有治疗益处且安全性可控。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b4f/5295788/8adf63f6522a/ott-10-591Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验