• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早产儿动脉导管未闭:治疗还是不治疗?

Patent ductus arteriosus in premature infants: to treat or not to treat?

作者信息

Mohamed M A, El-Dib M, Alqahtani S, Alyami K, Ibrahim A N, Aly H

机构信息

Division of Newborn Services, The George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Department of Newborn Services, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Perinatol. 2017 Jun;37(6):652-657. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.4. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1038/jp.2017.4
PMID:28206995
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Closing patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is a widely accepted approach in the management of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. Our objective is to test the hypothesis that conservative management (no treatment) of PDA will not affect survival without chronic lung diseases (CLD).

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective study utilizes a prospectively collected database to compare two cohorts of VLBW infants. Infants in the first group (2001 to 2009) had their PDA treated with pharmacological and if necessary with surgical ligation. PDA in the second group (2010 to 2014) was not treated with medical or surgical intervention. The primary outcome was survival without oxygen requirement at 36 weeks. Pulmonary and non-pulmonary morbidities were also compared. Logistic regression analyses were performed to control for confounders.

RESULTS

This study included 643 VLBW infants, of them 415 infants in the Treat group and 228 in the No-Treat group. The rate of survival without CLD did not differ between Treat and No-Treat groups (78.4% vs 83.9%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.72, confidence interval (CI): 0.92 to 3.23, P=0.09). Mortality declined in No-Treat group (15.2% vs 10.5%, aOR=0.51, CI: 0.25 to 0.99, P=0.049), but the two groups did not differ in the incidence of CLD among survivors (5.8% vs 5.0%,=P0.47). Pulmonary complications and non-pulmonary morbidities did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Conservative management (no treatment) of PDA may not compromise survival without CLD and is not associated with increased morbidities in VLBW infants. Prospective physiological studies are needed to determine the sector of VLBW infants, if any, who could benefit from PDA treatment.

摘要

目的

闭合动脉导管未闭(PDA)是极低出生体重(VLBW)婴儿管理中一种广泛接受的方法。我们的目的是检验以下假设:对PDA进行保守治疗(不治疗)不会影响无慢性肺部疾病(CLD)的生存率。

研究设计

这项回顾性研究利用一个前瞻性收集的数据库来比较两组VLBW婴儿。第一组(2001年至2009年)的婴儿的PDA采用药物治疗,必要时进行手术结扎。第二组(2010年至2014年)的PDA未进行药物或手术干预。主要结局是36周时无需吸氧的生存率。还比较了肺部和非肺部疾病的发生率。进行逻辑回归分析以控制混杂因素。

结果

本研究纳入了643例VLBW婴儿,其中治疗组415例,未治疗组228例。治疗组和未治疗组无CLD的生存率无差异(分别为78.4%和83.9%;调整后的优势比(aOR)=1.72,置信区间(CI):0.92至3.23,P=0.09)。未治疗组的死亡率有所下降(15.2%对10.5%,aOR=0.51,CI:0.25至0.99,P=0.049),但两组幸存者中CLD的发生率无差异(5.8%对5.0%,P=0.47)。两组之间的肺部并发症和非肺部疾病无差异。

结论

对PDA进行保守治疗(不治疗)可能不会影响无CLD的生存率,且与VLBW婴儿发病率增加无关。需要进行前瞻性生理学研究,以确定哪些VLBW婴儿(如果有的话)可以从PDA治疗中获益。

相似文献

1
Patent ductus arteriosus in premature infants: to treat or not to treat?早产儿动脉导管未闭:治疗还是不治疗?
J Perinatol. 2017 Jun;37(6):652-657. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.4. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
2
What happens when the patent ductus arteriosus is treated less aggressively in very low birth weight infants?动脉导管未闭在极低出生体重儿中治疗不积极时会发生什么?
J Perinatol. 2012 May;32(5):344-8. doi: 10.1038/jp.2011.102. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
3
Treatment of Patent Ductus Arteriosus with Cyclo-oxygenase Inhibitors beyond 2 Weeks of Age in Very Low Birth Weight Infants.出生体重极低的婴儿2周龄后使用环氧化酶抑制剂治疗动脉导管未闭
Am J Perinatol. 2016 May;33(6):584-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1570340. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
4
Patent ductus arteriosus management and outcomes in Japan and Canada: comparison of proactive and selective approaches.日本和加拿大动脉导管未闭的管理与治疗结果:积极与选择性治疗方法的比较
Am J Perinatol. 2015 Sep;32(11):1087-94. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1548727. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
5
Association of Patent Ductus Arteriosus Ligation With Death or Neurodevelopmental Impairment Among Extremely Preterm Infants.动脉导管未闭结扎术与极早产儿死亡或神经发育障碍的关联
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 May 1;171(5):443-449. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.5143.
6
Lung function in very low birth weight infants after pharmacological and surgical treatment of patent ductus arteriosus - a retrospective analysis.动脉导管未闭药物及手术治疗后极低出生体重儿的肺功能——一项回顾性分析
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Jan 6;17(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0762-z.
7
Ibuprofen for the treatment of a patent ductus arteriosus in preterm and/or low birth weight infants.布洛芬用于治疗早产儿和/或低出生体重儿的动脉导管未闭。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(2):CD003481. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003481.
8
Failure of a repeat course of cyclooxygenase inhibitor to close a PDA is a risk factor for developing chronic lung disease in ELBW infants.重复使用环氧化酶抑制剂未能关闭动脉导管未闭(PDA)是极低出生体重儿(ELBW)发生慢性肺部疾病的危险因素。
BMC Pediatr. 2012 Jan 27;12:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-10.
9
Effects of practice change on outcomes of extremely preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus.实践改变对患有动脉导管未闭的极早产儿结局的影响。
Acta Paediatr. 2019 Jan;108(1):88-93. doi: 10.1111/apa.14423. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
10
Surgical versus medical treatment with cyclooxygenase inhibitors for symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants.环氧化酶抑制剂用于早产儿症状性动脉导管未闭的手术治疗与药物治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(3):CD003951. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003951.

引用本文的文献

1
Experience of patent ductus arteriosus ligation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment in newborns with severe respiratory failure due to persistent pulmonary hypertension: a single-center retrospective study.体外膜肺氧合治疗新生儿持续肺动脉高压致严重呼吸衰竭中动脉导管结扎术的经验:单中心回顾性研究。
Ital J Pediatr. 2024 Nov 22;50(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s13052-024-01821-8.
2
Treatment of patent ductus arteriosus and short-term outcomes among extremely preterm infants: a multicentre cohort study.极早产儿动脉导管未闭的治疗及短期预后:一项多中心队列研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Dec 2;67:102356. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102356. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants.早产儿动脉导管未闭
Pediatrics. 2016 Jan;137(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3730. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
2
Paracetamol (acetaminophen) for patent ductus arteriosus in preterm or low-birth-weight infants.对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)用于早产儿或低体重儿动脉导管未闭的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 11(3):CD010061. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010061.pub2.
3
Ibuprofen for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm or low birth weight (or both) infants.布洛芬用于治疗早产或低出生体重(或两者兼具)婴儿的动脉导管未闭。
[Interpretation of the key updates in the 2022 European guideline on the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome].
[2022年欧洲新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征管理指南关键更新解读]
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Aug 15;25(8):779-784. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2303046.
4
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Extremely Premature Infants: A Scoping Review for Identifying Risk Factors.极早早产儿支气管肺发育不良:一项识别风险因素的范围综述
Biomedicines. 2023 Feb 14;11(2):553. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11020553.
5
Effectiveness and safety of rectal dexibuprofen versus oral ibuprofen for closure of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants with gestational age<34 weeks: A pilot study.直肠给予右旋布洛芬与口服布洛芬治疗胎龄<34 周早产儿动脉导管未闭的有效性和安全性:一项初步研究。
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2023 Jan-Dec;37:3946320231152993. doi: 10.1177/03946320231152993.
6
Conservative Treatment Without Any Intervention Compared With Other Therapeutic Strategies for Symptomatic Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Korea.与其他治疗策略相比,对极早产儿有症状的动脉导管未闭不进行任何干预的保守治疗:韩国一项全国性队列研究
Front Pediatr. 2021 Oct 6;9:729329. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.729329. eCollection 2021.
7
Patent ductus arteriosus treatment trends and associated morbidities in neonates.动脉导管未闭的新生儿治疗趋势及相关并发症。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 21;11(1):10689. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89868-z.
8
Conservative Management of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Assessing Differences in Outcome Measures Between Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies.早产儿动脉导管未闭的保守治疗——一项系统评价和荟萃分析,评估随机对照试验和队列研究在结局指标上的差异
Front Pediatr. 2021 Feb 25;9:626261. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.626261. eCollection 2021.
9
Factors Associated With Benefit of Treatment of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.早产儿动脉导管未闭治疗获益的相关因素:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Pediatr. 2021 Feb 9;9:626262. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.626262. eCollection 2021.
10
Patent Ductus Arteriosus of the Preterm Infant.早产儿动脉导管未闭。
Pediatrics. 2020 Nov;146(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-1209.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 18(2):CD003481. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003481.pub6.
4
Causes and timing of death in extremely premature infants from 2000 through 2011.2000 年至 2011 年间,极早产儿的死亡原因和时间。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):331-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1403489.
5
Surgical versus medical treatment with cyclooxygenase inhibitors for symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants.环氧化酶抑制剂用于早产儿有症状动脉导管未闭的手术治疗与药物治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD003951. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003951.pub3.
6
Neurodevelopmental outcomes following two different treatment approaches (early ligation and selective ligation) for patent ductus arteriosus.两种不同治疗方法(早期结扎和选择性结扎)治疗动脉导管未闭的神经发育结局。
J Pediatr. 2012 Dec;161(6):1065-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.05.062. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
7
Early surgical ligation versus a conservative approach for management of patent ductus arteriosus that fails to close after indomethacin treatment.吲哚美辛治疗后未闭的动脉导管未闭的早期手术结扎与保守治疗方法的比较。
J Pediatr. 2010 Sep;157(3):381-7, 387.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.02.062.
8
Treatment of persistent patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: time to accept the null hypothesis?早产儿持续性动脉导管未闭的治疗:是时候接受零假设了吗?
J Perinatol. 2010 Apr;30(4):241-52. doi: 10.1038/jp.2010.3. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
9
Scoliosis in patients with aortic coarctation and patent ductus arteriosus: does standard posterolateral thoracotomy play a role in the development of the lateral curve of the spine?主动脉缩窄和动脉导管未闭患者的脊柱侧弯:标准后外侧开胸手术在脊柱侧凸发展中起作用吗?
Pediatr Cardiol. 2009 Oct;30(7):941-5. doi: 10.1007/s00246-009-9469-3. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
10
Should all newborns who undergo patent ductus arteriosus ligation be examined for vocal fold mobility?所有接受动脉导管未闭结扎术的新生儿都应该接受声带活动度检查吗?
Laryngoscope. 2009 Aug;119(8):1606-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.20148.