Italian Network For Quality Assurance Of Tumor Biomarkers Inqat Group -
On behalf of the Italian Network for Quality Assessment of Tumor Biomarkers (INQAT) and with the col.
Int J Biol Markers. 2005 Jul-Sep;20(3):189-194. doi: 10.5301/JBM.2008.4178.
The clinical interest in HER-2/neu is related to trastuzumab, a drug used to treat patients with invasive breast carcinoma verexpressing the HER-2/neu protein. It is very important to correctly identify those patients who may benefit from trastuzumab by accurate ssessment of the HER-2/neu status. Of the various methods vailable, the Dako Herceptest for immunohistochemical assay is considered the most reliable to reach this goal. The aim of this study was to investigate within a group of Italian laboratories the reproducibility of the results of HER-2/neu assessment by means of the Dako scoring system on slides stained with the Herceptest kit. This study was also conceived as the continuation of one of our previous studies, which was similar in its aims but different in the classification criteria adopted. Our results show that, whereas the intra-observer reproducibility was generally satisfactory, the interobserver reproducibility was not. Moreover, our findings confirm that the two extreme classes (0 and 3+) are more easy to identify than the other two and that the Herceptest does not allow to discriminate optimally between scoring classes 2+ and 3+. These findings are relevant in clinical practice where the treatment choice is based on categories defined by this assay, suggesting the need of adopting educational programs and/or new reference materials to improve the assay performance. (Int J Biol Markers 2005; 20: 189-94).
对HER-2/neu的临床关注与曲妥珠单抗有关,该药物用于治疗过度表达HER-2/neu蛋白的浸润性乳腺癌患者。通过准确评估HER-2/neu状态来正确识别那些可能从曲妥珠单抗治疗中获益的患者非常重要。在可用的各种方法中,用于免疫组织化学检测的达科Herceptest被认为是实现这一目标最可靠的方法。本研究的目的是在一组意大利实验室中,调查使用达科评分系统对用Herceptest试剂盒染色的玻片进行HER-2/neu评估结果的可重复性。本研究也被视为我们之前一项研究的延续,两项研究目的相似,但采用的分类标准不同。我们的结果表明,尽管观察者内的可重复性总体上令人满意,但观察者间的可重复性却不尽人意。此外,我们的研究结果证实,两个极端类别(0和3+)比其他两个类别更容易识别,并且Herceptest无法在2+和3+评分类别之间进行最佳区分。这些发现在临床实践中具有重要意义,因为治疗选择基于该检测所定义的类别,这表明需要采用教育项目和/或新的参考材料来提高检测性能。(《国际生物标志物杂志》2005年;20:189 - 194)