Kanayama Masahiro, Hashimoto Tomoyuki, Shigenobu Keiichi, Oha Fumihiro, Iwata Akira, Tanaka Masaru
*Spine Center, Hakodate Central General Hospital †Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan.
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Mar;30(2):E99-E103. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182aa4c72.
A retrospective study.
The aim of the study was to review the treatment of deep wound infection after posterior instrumented lumbar fusion, and thereby to optimize the decision-making process of implant removal or retention on the basis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment.
Biofilm formed on the surface of the spinal implant prevents infiltration of antibiotics and makes the infection treatment more complicated. The decision of implant removal, if necessary, should be made appropriately, but the problem is a lack of consensus for implant removal or retention.
A total of 1445 consecutive patients who underwent posterior instrumented lumbar fusion were reviewed retrospectively. There were 23 deep wound infections (1.6%) requiring surgical treatment. MR images were used to evaluate the presence or absence of osteomyelitis of the instrumented vertebra and intervertebral abscess.
Six patients in the negative MRI group (n=7) were successfully treated by a single salvage surgery without implant removal; fusion occurred in 86% of the patients. However, in the positive MRI group (n=13), 4 patients required implant removal at the initial surgery and 5 patients eventually warranted implant removal after an average of 2.4 additional operations. Notably, 3 of the 4 patients who kept the implants ended up with a loss of fixation stability attributed to screw loosening with a progressive destruction of the instrumented vertebra. Therefore, the fusion rate was only 23% for the MRI-positive patients. Furthermore, making a wrong decision regarding implant removal increased the number of salvage surgeries and frequently resulted in progressive bone destruction and pseudarthrosis.
Once vertebral osteomyelitis and/or intervertebral abscess were evident in MR images, all the hardware should be removed. Failure to adhere to this recommendation resulted in multiple additional failed operations, and ultimately pseudarthrosis with further bony destruction.
一项回顾性研究。
本研究旨在回顾腰椎后路器械融合术后深部伤口感染的治疗情况,从而基于磁共振成像(MRI)评估优化植入物取出或保留的决策过程。
脊柱植入物表面形成的生物膜会阻碍抗生素的渗透,使感染治疗更加复杂。如有必要,应适当做出植入物取出的决定,但问题在于对于植入物取出或保留缺乏共识。
对1445例连续接受腰椎后路器械融合术的患者进行回顾性研究。其中有23例深部伤口感染(1.6%)需要手术治疗。利用磁共振图像评估植入椎骨骨髓炎和椎间隙脓肿的有无。
MRI阴性组(n = 7)的6例患者通过单次挽救性手术成功治疗,未取出植入物;86%的患者实现了融合。然而,在MRI阳性组(n = 13)中,4例患者在初次手术时需要取出植入物,5例患者最终在平均额外进行2.4次手术后也需要取出植入物。值得注意的是,4例保留植入物的患者中有3例最终因螺钉松动导致固定稳定性丧失,伴有植入椎骨的进行性破坏。因此,MRI阳性患者的融合率仅为23%。此外,关于植入物取出的错误决定增加了挽救性手术的次数,并经常导致进行性骨破坏和假关节形成。
一旦MRI图像中显示有椎体骨髓炎和/或椎间隙脓肿,应取出所有内固定物。不遵循这一建议会导致多次额外的手术失败,并最终导致假关节形成及进一步的骨质破坏。