Institute of Biological Chemistry, Biophysics, and Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, United Kingdom.
Department of Mathematics and the Maxwell Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Colin Maclaurin Building, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, United Kingdom.
Phys Rev E. 2017 Jan;95(1-1):012125. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.95.012125. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
Negative absolute temperatures were introduced into experimental physics by Purcell and Pound, who successfully applied this concept to nuclear spins; nevertheless, the concept has proved controversial: a recent article aroused considerable interest by its claim, based on a classical entropy formula (the "volume entropy") due to Gibbs, that negative temperatures violated basic principles of statistical thermodynamics. Here we give a thermodynamic analysis that confirms the negative-temperature interpretation of the Purcell-Pound experiments. We also examine the principal arguments that have been advanced against the negative temperature concept; we find that these arguments are not logically compelling, and moreover that the underlying "volume" entropy formula leads to predictions inconsistent with existing experimental results on nuclear spins. We conclude that, despite the counterarguments, negative absolute temperatures make good theoretical sense and did occur in the experiments designed to produce them.
负绝对温度是由珀塞尔和庞德引入实验物理学的,他们成功地将这一概念应用于核自旋;然而,这一概念一直存在争议:最近的一篇文章引起了相当大的兴趣,其根据吉布斯的一个经典熵公式(“体积熵”)声称,负温度违反了统计热力学的基本原理。在这里,我们进行了热力学分析,证实了珀塞尔-庞德实验的负温度解释。我们还研究了反对负温度概念的主要论点;我们发现这些论点在逻辑上没有说服力,而且基础的“体积”熵公式导致的预测与核自旋的现有实验结果不一致。我们的结论是,尽管存在相反的观点,但负绝对温度在理论上是有意义的,而且确实出现在了设计用来产生它们的实验中。